Deleting some inactives

What do you want to see in the game? what can be improved? any suggestions welcome here...
User avatar
Enter|Shikari
Forum Regular
Posts: 563
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:45 am
Alliance: HVE - CV
Race: Kraken
ID: 85384

Re: Deleting some inactives

Another good point on this(in my opinion) is that it will make GnR slightly harder to get :smt047
Spoiler
M4gic_H4nds wrote:Thel and I rock the Gimp.
[BoT] Jason wrote:But I'm not leet...
User avatar
Juliette
Verified
The Queen
Posts: 31802
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
Race: Royalty
ID: 4323
Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
Location: Ultima Thule

Re: Deleting some inactives

1 year is a good limit.
Image
User avatar
MEZZANINE
Forum Addict
Posts: 4453
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:39 am
Alliance: Forgotten Serenity
Race: System Lord
ID: 81691
Location: CARDIFF

Re: Deleting some inactives

SuperSaiyan wrote:
MEZZANINE wrote:IMO all accounts not logged into after 3 months should auto-vacation, and after 1 year on vacation should be deleted regardless of size, age or having bought SS at some point in the past.

This will drastically reduce the raider/traders and raider/multi/feeder accounts since raiding will actually require effort instead of just making a inactive war list to hit 5mins daily.

And a 5mil unascended noob is supposed to grow.... how?
You need the dead accounts for growth of everyone, especially small accounts.


There would still be raid targets, they would just require effort to find each day instead of long 'war' lists of inactives. Id bet the the small players would make the effort to find fresh targets, whereas the owners of multi/feeder accounts would not have the time, and for raider/traders it would not be worth making the effort.

Jedi~Tank wrote:what about farms? we would have to look elsewhere for naq, and elsewhere is in the big alliances/empires and we all know what thats gonna mean..not that I mind at all, but still. :-D


Exactly, all alliances farming each other and more scraps over the farming, all good IMO


Cole wrote:
MEZZANINE wrote:IMO all accounts not logged into after 3 months should auto-vacation, and after 1 year on vacation should be deleted regardless of size, age or having bought SS at some point in the past.

This will drastically reduce the raider/traders and raider/multi/feeder accounts since raiding will actually require effort instead of just making a inactive war list to hit 5mins daily.

That's too drastic, also it's unfair for accounts with SS (we never know why player is away for such a while, quite the bad thing to come back to see your account was deleted). Not to mention that naq not farmable there would be farmed in the active, regardless of their size/activity/...


TBH very few people return after a year away, anyone with an account of value can find time in a year to log in once to prevent deletion, and after a year most inactive accounts lose all their value anyway. On farming as I said to JT above, farming actives is all good.
Image

Image

Image
Spoiler
Attack Mercs Killed (30) 459,329,001
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 2,918,478,517
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 12,677,958
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 226,236,488
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 490,627,262
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 4,131,482,551
Spies Killed(50) 4,256,505,842
Spy Killers Killed(50) 651,022,448
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 35,583,034
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 39,498,511
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 2,413,254
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 358,539
Planets Taken(5000) 411
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 2,355,738,435,154,805
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 5,943,886,456
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 74,293,522,376,607
Attack Turns Used(1) 1,731,971
Kikaz
For the Lulz
Posts: 6607
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:54 pm
Alliance: Jötunheim
Race: Lulz
ID: 3471
Alternate name(s): Misery
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: Deleting some inactives

Read the first post guys...

I specified 500,000 army size and smaller, a year of inactivity, unascended.

You can throw in less than 20,000 RAW UP and no Supporter Status if you like..

I mean I can go to page 1,000 and find an account with a 13,000 ID and 3 UP and 80k army.

That's a 6 year old account never been logged into a part from first day it was created, accounts like that should go.

You say this will hurt raiding? I say it will help it, theres probably 1,000 pages of accounts that meet this criteria deleting them will just leave to bigger accounts and will make raiding a lot faster to find targets.

No ones growing off of an 80k army, 3 UP account, and lets face it there are a ton. ;)
Image
Quotes
Meanwhile in MaYHeM
Duderanch wrote:And so it would come to pass, in December of 2012 the war between the ponies and the pandas broke out..it lasted 21 days, the result? Armagedon.
Noobert wrote:Kikaz scares me at times, and he's in my own alliance.
Dr. House wrote:I HAVE THE POWER! The power to warn, and I will **Filtered** use it too.
Kateaclysmic wrote: I thought you loved me, Kikaz. I'm getting an abortion.
Sarevok wrote:
Kikaz wrote:Ridiculous.
Congrats on the most constructive post ever...
Affirmation wrote: And Speaking of bad boys (the baddest)... Kikaz is right, Q is a family, and Affy is the love child of Kikaz and Kateaclysmic!! That is right... I am NOT AN ABORTION... but she never nursed me and Kikaz stopped being a terrible father figure to Affy years ago... Family - HA... Affy's old arse...[-X

Where is the love Kikaz??? WHERE IS THE LOVE (Dad... :smt047 ) ??? [-(
I creep though shadows
I rise up at night
I live just inside you
And give you a terrible fright
I walk through the darkness
I lurk under your bed
I live in your wardrobe
I creep up in the shed.
I tiptoe through the corridor
I follow you anywhere
I rip your braveness apart
And never ever care
I am fear so don't come near..
2007 Quantum Player of the Year Runner-up - 2011 Villian of the Year - 2012 Hall of Fame - 2012 Quantum Player of the Year Runner-up - Leader and Co-founder of the 2014 Alliance of the Year
User avatar
GeneralChaos
Forum Addict
Posts: 3421
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:56 pm
Alliance: Omega
ID: 59627

Re: Deleting some inactives

You need those inactive accounts for the new / small players to kick start them,

The GnR should just be capped at rank 500 and below, remember its GLORY and REPUTATION
Deep within Noob Cave, you find a strange pool filled with a glowing blue liquid. You think back to what your mother told you about unfamiliar liquids found in caves.

You're pretty sure she said "Drink it! What's the worst that can happen?"
User avatar
[BoT] Jason
Forum History
Posts: 10120
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:37 am
Alliance: TA
Race: DIEDAYDIEDAY
ID: 13003152
Alternate name(s): Pimp,Slenderman
Location: Right behind you

Re: Deleting some inactives

Decrease lag by deleting all of them and just increase resources gained by newbies

Problems solved
Pimping

Feb 06, 06:16 Field Marshall Attack defended 15 88,977,968 0 x,x62,635,278,400 900,114 details

| | Hero of the Year | |

Winner: BMMJ13
User avatar
Cole
Forum History
Posts: 10000
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:45 am
Alliance: Generations
Race: System Lord
ID: 7889
Alternate name(s): Legendary Apophis, Apophis The Great, Legendary

Re: Deleting some inactives

No, in fact I think, as I said already many times, the following should be removed and only those who meet all of those requirements (admin already removed them several times by the way):

    -Below 500k army size
    -UP below 100
    -No SS/USS ever bought
    -Inactive for more than six months
    -Unascended

That's true inactive accounts, who never bothered to play, and are totally unlikely to come back. By removing these, we would get rid of at least 10k accounts.
Kikaz
For the Lulz
Posts: 6607
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:54 pm
Alliance: Jötunheim
Race: Lulz
ID: 3471
Alternate name(s): Misery
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: Deleting some inactives

GeneralChaos wrote:You need those inactive accounts for the new / small players to kick start them,

The GnR should just be capped at rank 500 and below, remember its GLORY and REPUTATION

Accounts that make 80 UU and 1 bill NAQ per month, no one needs those... :?
Image
Quotes
Meanwhile in MaYHeM
Duderanch wrote:And so it would come to pass, in December of 2012 the war between the ponies and the pandas broke out..it lasted 21 days, the result? Armagedon.
Noobert wrote:Kikaz scares me at times, and he's in my own alliance.
Dr. House wrote:I HAVE THE POWER! The power to warn, and I will **Filtered** use it too.
Kateaclysmic wrote: I thought you loved me, Kikaz. I'm getting an abortion.
Sarevok wrote:
Kikaz wrote:Ridiculous.
Congrats on the most constructive post ever...
Affirmation wrote: And Speaking of bad boys (the baddest)... Kikaz is right, Q is a family, and Affy is the love child of Kikaz and Kateaclysmic!! That is right... I am NOT AN ABORTION... but she never nursed me and Kikaz stopped being a terrible father figure to Affy years ago... Family - HA... Affy's old arse...[-X

Where is the love Kikaz??? WHERE IS THE LOVE (Dad... :smt047 ) ??? [-(
I creep though shadows
I rise up at night
I live just inside you
And give you a terrible fright
I walk through the darkness
I lurk under your bed
I live in your wardrobe
I creep up in the shed.
I tiptoe through the corridor
I follow you anywhere
I rip your braveness apart
And never ever care
I am fear so don't come near..
2007 Quantum Player of the Year Runner-up - 2011 Villian of the Year - 2012 Hall of Fame - 2012 Quantum Player of the Year Runner-up - Leader and Co-founder of the 2014 Alliance of the Year
User avatar
Enter|Shikari
Forum Regular
Posts: 563
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:45 am
Alliance: HVE - CV
Race: Kraken
ID: 85384

Re: Deleting some inactives

There are a lot of accounts that have around 1,800 army size, meaning the have 1 UP and the 1,000 or so units you start off with.
They can all be deleted surely, and any ones that have planets, maybe the planets should be set into space?
Spoiler
M4gic_H4nds wrote:Thel and I rock the Gimp.
[BoT] Jason wrote:But I'm not leet...
User avatar
Kesl
Forum Grunt
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:15 am
Race: Anceint Goa'uld
ID: 1968958
Location: Secret hide out

Re: Deleting some inactives

Cole wrote:
Kikaz wrote:Not saying deleting every inactive account.

But the ones 5 years old unascended with 3 UP and 80k army I think should be deleted or placed on vac mode until they log in again.

So requirements to delete, 1 year inactivity, unascended, less than 500k army?

Doing this could clean upserver and help identify multies because honestly who farms past page 1,000 and the next 1,600 pages after that?

Or could just send them to perg...

I agree. Also, no SS/USS bought.



I agree with you mate, before I start playing this game (about few days ago) I wasn't using my account for a long time.
User avatar
Adonex
Forum Newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:08 pm
ID: 0

Re: Deleting some inactives

Yeah but there is about 80k accounts for maybe 2000 players, maybe bring it down to 10x the number of active players? Which will still be a huge amount of accounts to farm from
Image
DDE special medals
ImageImageImage
War medals
Image
Experience medals and ribbons
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
The Camps medals
ImageImageImage

ImageImageImage
Kikaz
For the Lulz
Posts: 6607
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:54 pm
Alliance: Jötunheim
Race: Lulz
ID: 3471
Alternate name(s): Misery
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: Deleting some inactives

Kesl wrote:
Cole wrote:
Kikaz wrote:Not saying deleting every inactive account.

But the ones 5 years old unascended with 3 UP and 80k army I think should be deleted or placed on vac mode until they log in again.

So requirements to delete, 1 year inactivity, unascended, less than 500k army?

Doing this could clean upserver and help identify multies because honestly who farms past page 1,000 and the next 1,600 pages after that?

Or could just send them to perg...

I agree. Also, no SS/USS bought.



I agree with you mate, before I start playing this game (about few days ago) I wasn't using my account for a long time.

But even so I bet you had more than an unacended with 3 UP and 80k army I'm suggesting deleting the 30k accounts that were made and never even played..

Doing this would also make it easier to find people's multis..
Image
Quotes
Meanwhile in MaYHeM
Duderanch wrote:And so it would come to pass, in December of 2012 the war between the ponies and the pandas broke out..it lasted 21 days, the result? Armagedon.
Noobert wrote:Kikaz scares me at times, and he's in my own alliance.
Dr. House wrote:I HAVE THE POWER! The power to warn, and I will **Filtered** use it too.
Kateaclysmic wrote: I thought you loved me, Kikaz. I'm getting an abortion.
Sarevok wrote:
Kikaz wrote:Ridiculous.
Congrats on the most constructive post ever...
Affirmation wrote: And Speaking of bad boys (the baddest)... Kikaz is right, Q is a family, and Affy is the love child of Kikaz and Kateaclysmic!! That is right... I am NOT AN ABORTION... but she never nursed me and Kikaz stopped being a terrible father figure to Affy years ago... Family - HA... Affy's old arse...[-X

Where is the love Kikaz??? WHERE IS THE LOVE (Dad... :smt047 ) ??? [-(
I creep though shadows
I rise up at night
I live just inside you
And give you a terrible fright
I walk through the darkness
I lurk under your bed
I live in your wardrobe
I creep up in the shed.
I tiptoe through the corridor
I follow you anywhere
I rip your braveness apart
And never ever care
I am fear so don't come near..
2007 Quantum Player of the Year Runner-up - 2011 Villian of the Year - 2012 Hall of Fame - 2012 Quantum Player of the Year Runner-up - Leader and Co-founder of the 2014 Alliance of the Year
WoofyBear
Forum Irregular
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:26 am
Alliance: Ω TITAN
Race: BEAR
ID: 8008

Re: Deleting some inactives

Here is a suggestion... The accounts on vac more than 6 months are put back into the main server. BUT, and here is the kicker, the planets on "vac'ed" accounts should not be takeable. If/when the owner logs in again, all war relations to it are set to neutral (because he WILL be farmed during the time he is on vac). He will want his account intact when he starts to play it again so when he logs into it again, it should be reset to the state it was in when he set vac. This will increase the farming out there, it will keep the G&R range accessible to the newer players and make raiding/farming better for us all. All unascended accounts left inactive for a year should be deleted. PEROID. If the vac'ed accounts are put back into play, this will give the nooblets something to farm as well as the rest of us and it will be profitable for everyone without deleting accounts of some of the legends that played the game who might one day rejoin us.

The amount of time before an account is 'vac'ed' is negotiable... hell, it can be done the same day because there is no ill affect to the account that is vac'ed for the player because it is reset to original state when he logs in again. This means better farming for everyone.. especially the new players just starting out and they we dont have to worry about pages and pages of worthless accounts on the server OR the G&R range dramatically changing when the crap accounts are deleted.
Image

"...Although I have made a career out of remodeling the truth into convenient shapes while taking possession of commodities legally belonging to others. I would dispute the fact that what I've done has been wrong. Legally yes, but you should know that the universe is not by nature an equitable distributor of good health and good fortune."

FeedBack
Spoiler
Spoiler
Everyone else has nice little quotes about them in their sig.. I thought this one would be snazzy...
AeonKnight wrote: You know you single Handedly made nearly all of them inacitve. well done.
Spoiler
Cobolt wrote:
Another important thing regarding such things are that I also feel that my "shadow" shouldn´t be "everywhere" in the alliance. A legacy is in my opinion a good thing as long as it is on a foundation level, values and such. But if it seeps to much into things it is very hard for current leadership to make own policy as ppl tend to referr to "old ways" wich rarely are up to date.... As I have said to other leaders, it was never my intention to try to keep the alliance as a static entity - infact quite the opposite, I was adamant to keep evolving the alliance according to how the game developed, only thing I felt needed to be solid is the sprit, heart and foundation of Titans that in my opinion could be described with a few words - "good guys". :)
[/quote]
Spoiler
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:DDE SUCK...that is all!!!
Bring it on TAF. ;)
TAF posted that?!?!...I thought ~DP~did!!!
Osiris™ wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:DDE SUCK...that is all!!!

If there is anything you do suck on then its my back vagina ;)
You sir must like men doesn't mean I do and if I did KJ would be my type I don't go after bottom feeders :smt078
ZERO
Spoiler
On 1/14/14, at 5:12 PM, Dean Bailey Z E R O 1907332 HVE Canadia wrote:
> glad his return overshadowed our betrayal.
WoofyBear
Forum Irregular
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:26 am
Alliance: Ω TITAN
Race: BEAR
ID: 8008

Re: Deleting some inactives

SuperSaiyan wrote:why should vacationed accounts come off vacation mode? :?


It would allow us to get the crap accounts deleted from the server without affecting G&R range and still ensure that there is enough naq out there for the noobs that are just joining the game...
Image

"...Although I have made a career out of remodeling the truth into convenient shapes while taking possession of commodities legally belonging to others. I would dispute the fact that what I've done has been wrong. Legally yes, but you should know that the universe is not by nature an equitable distributor of good health and good fortune."

FeedBack
Spoiler
Spoiler
Everyone else has nice little quotes about them in their sig.. I thought this one would be snazzy...
AeonKnight wrote: You know you single Handedly made nearly all of them inacitve. well done.
Spoiler
Cobolt wrote:
Another important thing regarding such things are that I also feel that my "shadow" shouldn´t be "everywhere" in the alliance. A legacy is in my opinion a good thing as long as it is on a foundation level, values and such. But if it seeps to much into things it is very hard for current leadership to make own policy as ppl tend to referr to "old ways" wich rarely are up to date.... As I have said to other leaders, it was never my intention to try to keep the alliance as a static entity - infact quite the opposite, I was adamant to keep evolving the alliance according to how the game developed, only thing I felt needed to be solid is the sprit, heart and foundation of Titans that in my opinion could be described with a few words - "good guys". :)
[/quote]
Spoiler
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:DDE SUCK...that is all!!!
Bring it on TAF. ;)
TAF posted that?!?!...I thought ~DP~did!!!
Osiris™ wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:DDE SUCK...that is all!!!

If there is anything you do suck on then its my back vagina ;)
You sir must like men doesn't mean I do and if I did KJ would be my type I don't go after bottom feeders :smt078
ZERO
Spoiler
On 1/14/14, at 5:12 PM, Dean Bailey Z E R O 1907332 HVE Canadia wrote:
> glad his return overshadowed our betrayal.
WoofyBear
Forum Irregular
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:26 am
Alliance: Ω TITAN
Race: BEAR
ID: 8008

Re: Deleting some inactives

SuperSaiyan wrote:
WoofyBear wrote:
SuperSaiyan wrote:why should vacationed accounts come off vacation mode? :?


It would allow us to get the crap accounts deleted from the server without affecting G&R range and still ensure that there is enough naq out there for the noobs that are just joining the game...

and what about the people that vacationed under the pretense it was permanent (incase they wanted to come back), left stats and other things on their accounts?

I hardly think that is fair to them :?


you didnt read the post completely? When they log back in, the account is put back into the exact state it was in when they set vac.... no planets are taken, all uu and naq are still there.... exactly the same.. only people can mass or farm the "ghost".. when they log back in, the ghost disappears and the original account is reset to its previous state (like vac is now). Planets on "ghosts" are not takeable... UU and naq are farmable but there is no record on the account of this when they log in to come back off vac....

EDIT: the admins could go so far as to reset the stats on the "ghosts" every market reset to ensure that current rankings didnt change too much.... or not... They could even put in the recon report that it is a 'ghost' when you recon it...
Image

"...Although I have made a career out of remodeling the truth into convenient shapes while taking possession of commodities legally belonging to others. I would dispute the fact that what I've done has been wrong. Legally yes, but you should know that the universe is not by nature an equitable distributor of good health and good fortune."

FeedBack
Spoiler
Spoiler
Everyone else has nice little quotes about them in their sig.. I thought this one would be snazzy...
AeonKnight wrote: You know you single Handedly made nearly all of them inacitve. well done.
Spoiler
Cobolt wrote:
Another important thing regarding such things are that I also feel that my "shadow" shouldn´t be "everywhere" in the alliance. A legacy is in my opinion a good thing as long as it is on a foundation level, values and such. But if it seeps to much into things it is very hard for current leadership to make own policy as ppl tend to referr to "old ways" wich rarely are up to date.... As I have said to other leaders, it was never my intention to try to keep the alliance as a static entity - infact quite the opposite, I was adamant to keep evolving the alliance according to how the game developed, only thing I felt needed to be solid is the sprit, heart and foundation of Titans that in my opinion could be described with a few words - "good guys". :)
[/quote]
Spoiler
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:DDE SUCK...that is all!!!
Bring it on TAF. ;)
TAF posted that?!?!...I thought ~DP~did!!!
Osiris™ wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:DDE SUCK...that is all!!!

If there is anything you do suck on then its my back vagina ;)
You sir must like men doesn't mean I do and if I did KJ would be my type I don't go after bottom feeders :smt078
ZERO
Spoiler
On 1/14/14, at 5:12 PM, Dean Bailey Z E R O 1907332 HVE Canadia wrote:
> glad his return overshadowed our betrayal.
Post Reply

Return to “Game Suggestions”