So it makes me a little pissed that my supporter bonus of bank increase is gone now. Where is the restitution for Market turns used in the past and the bank size lost from this update from supporter status. If anything people that lost bank size should be repaid for this crap. Essentially every time I have used a MT to increase bank space or have bought USS or SS in the past are now losing a big part of their bonus. This needs to be returned with AT or UU or Naq. Not to mention the loss of Alliance naq used to increase overall bank size. Some alliances have used 100s of Tril to build their bank sizes for all their members to larger personal capacity.
I personally think this needs to be reset back to way it was. If anything Max out the Covert bonus to banks space at a relative lvl like lvl 37 or something that way it still requires miners to increase vault capacity.
Bank sizes updated
-
Eisen Feuer
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:49 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Australia
- MaxSterling
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:32 pm
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium
- ID: 83707
- Alternate name(s): Naq Daddy, The guy that just stole your naq.
- Location: In ur bank... stealin ur nakz.
Re: Bank sizes updated
Iƒrit wrote:RoKeT wrote:MaxSterling wrote:RoKeT wrote:Eärendil wrote:Iƒrit wrote:Eärendil wrote:SuperSaiyan wrote:Admin, might I suggest a ppt to prevent abusive farming until this is fixed?
Its apparently a farming frenzy
*coughs* or roll back 6/7 hrs (or when you changed it)
yep this would make some sense.... aparently lots of naq has been farmed due to bug.
Mhm. While giving a ppt/days worth of income to many, I bet many more lost a lot more than they lost.
off one person alone i've farmed over 13 Trill naq, so i'm sure they won't be happy xD
Hope your account gets banned. Back in the day if people took advantage of an exploit/bug, they'd get banned if they didn't send the goods to admin's account. The fact that you're in this thread and taking advantage of it only verifies that you are knowingly taking advantage of a bug.
and your knowingly jealous shuddup troll, you'd be doing it to, if Admin keeps this it's not exploiting a bug, and if he doesn't keep it then there is no harm as it will be rolled back, you'd be dumb to not hit someone for 6.5Trill naq and you know it![]()
Their is a huge difference... you know their is a bug and you are knowingly using it to your advantage. As are several people in TL chat at the moment, I am not going to come off PPT and exploit a bug that admin knows about and apparently lacks the common sense to do something about. No offense, but serious jason you need to do something here....
Thank you Ifrit. RoKeT... everytime I think you can't look more stupid, you out do yourself. Why would I be jealous of someone exploiting a bug knowingly and stupid enough to post it in the thread?
My concern is obviously with the people in DDE's shoutbox holding alliance funds with their previous bank sizes... and have now leaked out due to admin's nearsightedness in testing this out before implementing it... or at the very least protecting everyone from his stupid update by putting them on PPT first.
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Bank sizes updated
arggh... i see it. also see where /why ... fixing...
nothing is ever easy
nothing is ever easy
Z E R O wrote:Still missing 1/3 of my original bank...
Not impressed..
Don't make me use this!!!
- Enter|Shikari
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:45 am
- Alliance: HVE - CV
- Race: Kraken
- ID: 85384
Re: Bank sizes updated
Forum wrote:arggh... i see it. also see where /why ... fixing...
nothing is ever easy
Z E R O wrote:Still missing 1/3 of my original bank...
Not impressed..
the word Beta comes to mind
Spoiler
M4gic_H4nds wrote:Thel and I rock the Gimp.
[BoT] Jason wrote:But I'm not leet...
-
Empy
- Derper
- Posts: 7215
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:02 pm
- Race: Eldar
- Location: The other side of the fence
Re: Bank sizes updated
The intended effect is (for clarification for those who don't want to actually read and understand)
If your total bank capacity was above the cost of your next covert level; no change.
If your total bank capacity was below the cost of your next covert level; it's raised to the cost of your next covert level.
If your total bank capacity is below 1tril, and so is the cost of your next level; your bank space is raised to 1tril.
THAT is what is supposed to happen, last time I checked there is still a bug, and banks are BELOW what they should be. I assume Admin is working to fix this.
If your total bank capacity was above the cost of your next covert level; no change.
If your total bank capacity was below the cost of your next covert level; it's raised to the cost of your next covert level.
If your total bank capacity is below 1tril, and so is the cost of your next level; your bank space is raised to 1tril.
THAT is what is supposed to happen, last time I checked there is still a bug, and banks are BELOW what they should be. I assume Admin is working to fix this.
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Bank sizes updated
problem with rollback: it would be at least 18hours rollback.
i backed up just the table -not the whole database - before update (did not forsee these issues).
so its a bit of a big deal. and affects EVERYONE. And can go horribly wrong once started.
I use this as a last resort only.
Those that benefitted beyond reasonable can email in their benefitted naq amount, and we can remove it... or give it to the admin account (id 1).
thank you.
i backed up just the table -not the whole database - before update (did not forsee these issues).
so its a bit of a big deal. and affects EVERYONE. And can go horribly wrong once started.
I use this as a last resort only.
Those that benefitted beyond reasonable can email in their benefitted naq amount, and we can remove it... or give it to the admin account (id 1).
thank you.
Don't make me use this!!!
-
Tekki
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:37 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Bank sizes updated
Forum wrote:arggh... i see it. also see where /why ... fixing...
nothing is ever easy
Z E R O wrote:Still missing 1/3 of my original bank...
Not impressed..
Admin, not to poke fun, but if you put everyone on PPT before making drastic changes - and leaking banks IS a drastic change - then no one would be having issues.
Spoiler
Initial masser on Field Marshal's 120t defence and on Rodwolf's 177t defence.
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
A sentiment I can agree with, except some of them have never done a good job. For further details, PM me INGAME Id 9095.Jedi~Tank wrote:@ADMINS- ALL ADMINS, this is the absolute worst game forum I have ever seen (this sentiment is shared by many) It is amazing how ya;ll can go from good job to complete garbage in no time at all.
Jedi~Tank
---


Spoiler


-
Tekki
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:37 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Bank sizes updated
Forum wrote:problem with rollback: it would be at least 18hours rollback.
i backed up just the table -not the whole database - before update (did not forsee these issues).
so its a bit of a big deal. and affects EVERYONE. And can go horribly wrong once started.
I use this as a last resort only.
Those that benefitted beyond reasonable can email in their benefitted naq amount, and we can remove it... or give it to the admin account (id 1).
thank you.
So those that didn’t get the chance to benefit can also email asking for a contribution?
Do you really think people will give up the benefits? I doubt it.
Spoiler
Initial masser on Field Marshal's 120t defence and on Rodwolf's 177t defence.
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
A sentiment I can agree with, except some of them have never done a good job. For further details, PM me INGAME Id 9095.Jedi~Tank wrote:@ADMINS- ALL ADMINS, this is the absolute worst game forum I have ever seen (this sentiment is shared by many) It is amazing how ya;ll can go from good job to complete garbage in no time at all.
Jedi~Tank
---


Spoiler


-
Empy
- Derper
- Posts: 7215
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:02 pm
- Race: Eldar
- Location: The other side of the fence
Re: Bank sizes updated
I would except the people bragging about it here in this topic would ... *cough* RoKeT *cough*Tekki wrote:Forum wrote:problem with rollback: it would be at least 18hours rollback.
i backed up just the table -not the whole database - before update (did not forsee these issues).
so its a bit of a big deal. and affects EVERYONE. And can go horribly wrong once started.
I use this as a last resort only.
Those that benefitted beyond reasonable can email in their benefitted naq amount, and we can remove it... or give it to the admin account (id 1).
thank you.
So those that didn’t get the chance to benefit can also email asking for a contribution?
Do you really think people will give up the benefits? I doubt it.
-
Baxter
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:12 am
- Alliance: ~Sand Village~
- Race: Australian
- ID: 1961730
- Location: Australia
Re: Bank sizes updated
i lost 30T space ![[089.gif] :smt089](./images/smilies/089.gif)
though 70T is free
![[089.gif] :smt089](./images/smilies/089.gif)
though 70T is free
Prior - Prophet - Messiah - Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG- AGL - IAG - TAG - PTAG - LTAG - QTAG - KTAG - GAG - TOE - TUS - TUN - TUK


Spoiler
Byrnes wrote:Triangle Allegiance is accepting applications now
Juliette wrote:To recommend Chrome is to say "Here, have this grenade. I'll pull the plug. Now you hold on to that grenade and run like hell."
IE beats Chrome. Hell, EVERYTHING beats Chrome. ICQ **Filtered** beats Chrome. A telex beats Chrome. And even.. BP beats Chrome.
-
RoKeT
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:03 am
- Race: The King Jaffa
- Location: New York
Re: Bank sizes updated
Honestly J going back 18 hours would prob be better then letting what you are letting go... I have a feeling some people are going to quit because of this and we deff dont need that...
Ex Mod
Looking for an Account?
21 Accounts sold to Date
Looking for an Account?
Spoiler
I can find you one...
Spoiler
Very trusted Trader
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Bank sizes updated
if i only lived backwards, i'd have perfect foresight...
if i only learned from past mistakes, i'd not be an idiot...
if i only ...
shouldacouldawoulda....
honestly - this is unfortunate but recoverable...
in even the medium term, its not a huge impact...
that said, will see if there is anything else (outside of rollback) that makes sense.
till then, individuals can email.
and 'i did not benefit' is not a good reason. those that did are expected to return ; those that got lost can ask to be reviewed; those that did nothing and were not affected, are not affected.
if i only learned from past mistakes, i'd not be an idiot...
if i only ...
shouldacouldawoulda....

honestly - this is unfortunate but recoverable...
in even the medium term, its not a huge impact...
that said, will see if there is anything else (outside of rollback) that makes sense.
till then, individuals can email.
and 'i did not benefit' is not a good reason. those that did are expected to return ; those that got lost can ask to be reviewed; those that did nothing and were not affected, are not affected.
Don't make me use this!!!
- MaxSterling
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:32 pm
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium
- ID: 83707
- Alternate name(s): Naq Daddy, The guy that just stole your naq.
- Location: In ur bank... stealin ur nakz.
Re: Bank sizes updated
Oh... and Jason, I know of at least one person that wasted their Market Turns on bank capacity upgrades because of your screw up. Are you going to reimburse them with their Market Turns since they used them to keep their naq from leaking out, when before this update... they had the space?
-
~Dä Vinci~
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:14 am
- Alliance: TÅÅE
- Race: I Love Lampey!
- ID: 1992329
- Alternate name(s): ~Tom~, Andy, Field marshall, ETL, Huxley, rudy, borek, rocky, C2, bruno, harsasnails, robe, R8, couzens, Lord Katsumoto, Da reno, The Queen of england, and a pineapple but only on sundays.
- Location: In Side Daku While playing on multis and useing my scripts
Re: Bank sizes updated
few people sitting with 15t naq out 1 guy has 280t naq out when his ppt drops hes screwed..
Matt: I like men, especially when they are bent over in the shower.
Trade Feedback
-
Reschef
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2430
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:15 am
- Alliance: ~Ricos Warlords~ (retired)
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 37648
- Location: Germany / Berlin
Re: Bank sizes updated
RoKeT wrote:Honestly J going back 18 hours would prob be better then letting what you are letting go... I have a feeling some people are going to quit because of this and we deff dont need that...
agreed. a roll back is definatelly needed. and as I stated before, if you plan on updating something that has direct influence on peoples rescources ... put the game on maintenance mode or put all players on PPT while changing stuff and bugfixing.
Spoiler
Borek wrote: No one ever died from playing SGW, although i think some of the whiners may come close to drowning in their own tears![]()











[/url]



