Defense Additions

Locked

This is a good idea

NOOOO, u r an idiot, leave it as it is
13
72%
Yessss! I like it
5
28%
 
Total votes: 18
User avatar
Londo Mollari
Lawnmower
Posts: 5466
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:15 am
Alliance: Serenity
Race: Jinchuriki
Location: Wherever Wally is
Contact:

Defense Additions

Ok, here we go!
I think that a cool addition 2 the game would be a slight change in the defense of ur realm. It would mean that after a certain number of attacks on ur realm u recieve a bonus to your defense. This could be put down to the fact that your troops are setting traps, are more alert and have strengthened their defenses, here is what i suggest:

no of attacks on ur realm: Increase in defense stats (%)
8 5
12 10
16 15
20 20
>24 25
This means that u would get an added defensive bonus and means that u stand a greater chance of retaining your naq, however it will not effect farming peope with 0 defense, as 125% of 0 = 0!!! :twisted:
hope u like it!!!!
Mordack wrote: I'd probably go gay for Benjamin Linus. He's everything I want to be.
Speaking as a Mod
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

So, essentially you're saying that you get a bonus for doing nothing except for BEING attacked.

Don't think this is on to a winner.

Additionally - this would benefit Asgard the most (who already have the highest defence) - and everyone would have the same bonus after 25 atatcks anyway - so what is the point?
Last edited by Wolf359 on Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
User avatar
Cole
Forum History
Posts: 10000
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:45 am
Alliance: Generations
Race: System Lord
ID: 7889
Alternate name(s): Legendary Apophis, Apophis The Great, Legendary

lol i'll note vote bcause I am neutral and think what you say only available for active players (like the unability to trade with unactive accounts): ok for actives, not ok for unactives :-) :)
cinder__393
Forum Grunt
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:39 am

so your saying when some one is massed and say the 10th attack on them they get bonus defence to defend with (it would be hard enof massing some of those 10 bill defences let alone the 30 bill) and the makeing it harder... :(
leave it as it is ... Because other wise some one could argue that attacking some one should give a bonus for the same reason "because they are more prepared then the enemy" they know there gonna attack
Image
ANTI CHEATER ...
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

cinder__393 wrote:so your saying when some one is massed and say the 10th attack on them they get bonus defence to defend with (it would be hard enof massing some of those 10 bill defences let alone the 30 bill) and the makeing it harder... :(
leave it as it is ... Because other wise some one could argue that attacking some one should give a bonus for the same reason "because they are more prepared then the enemy" they know there gonna attack


Very good point!
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
User avatar
Londo Mollari
Lawnmower
Posts: 5466
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:15 am
Alliance: Serenity
Race: Jinchuriki
Location: Wherever Wally is
Contact:

true, but maybe gain an extra bonus for attack, ie.
No of attacks Attack bonus (%)
8 10
16 20
32 30
This could be put down to attack tactics being developed or troop teamwork increasing?
Mordack wrote: I'd probably go gay for Benjamin Linus. He's everything I want to be.
Speaking as a Mod
Loksorr

I'll wote for that, and an equal bonus, for attack, but based on the attacked player. If you attack a stronger player you get "Attack points" you defend from a stronger player (farmer) you get defence points.
But you lose both attacking a weaker player.

It all makes sense in real life.
lord telchac
Forum Grunt
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:58 pm

No
liam óg
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:12 pm

If someones been attacked alot there defence would be tired therefore they should have a lower defence
Image
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

liam óg wrote:If someones been attacked alot there defence would be tired therefore they should have a lower defence


Again, a very good point.
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
User avatar
Mango
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 769
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:15 pm
ID: 0
Location: Brisbane, Australia

we dont need any more bonus to defence and if we did the traos etc would be set up before the first attack not after the 10th attack.

think about it, your military arnt going to think 'i cant wait for them to attack us 5 times then we can apply to get some claymore mines'
BL1P wrote:Im sorry for your fiend and the toilet paper accident...
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”