Rocky wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:Rocky wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:Rocky wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:Rocky wrote:what about those other two guys who hit for less than half as much as i did lol, ur an idiot, i blocked you cause you blocked me, your own fault.
also too bad you had like 8 better planets from which i could choose one back. another fail.
I don't accept this vendetta cause you have nothing. That was the last fail.
i took a mini planet to call your atention
I think he was being kool about it so...is that a fail?
taking a planet from me is not being cool about it.
He called you on a vendy for a reason and I think its a good reason, a valid reason, and a reason you must answer too.
i must, must I?
no.
Thats your choice..clearly your actions are provoking something..if you want all out war just say so..no need for games..otherwise play the vendetta.
i don't want that, but it seems robert does, this is his 4th vendetta in a row with TL members, go figure
Its for a reason Rocko..and if you are blind to it I will enlighten you...not so long a go a DDE member was farming an alliance regular..when that alliance was at war this player stopped out of respect for that alliance...now I am aware that our DRA allows for hits according to the ratio..and out of respect and doing our part to change the culture in the game as best we can..instead of taking these kind of things to an alliance vs alliance level we keep it on the individual level...now is there a pat on the head needed? No. Its no great thing here..but nevertheless if the same old same is ever going to change then some things can and should be kept on an individual level. Rob3rt feels as do I that your farming tactics are not in the spirit of good or even decent relations between DDE and TL..we ventured into this DRA type thing for the first time ever..we wasnt forced too and dam sure didnt need it despite all of the idiocy that went on in this forum last summer..but in the spirit of respect and the interest of improving GW as whole we did so with conditions..one of them being vendetta's to settle some issues that arise.
If issues between alliances that arise by individual members cannot be settled by individuals then we can do nothing but the status quo (did I spell that right?). Are you with me? is my post understandable? I know I am not the most eloquent poster..but I do try.
Edit..Rob3rt is not an attention seeking kind of guy, he is seeking a vendetta against you for a reason.























![[048.gif] :smt048](./images/smilies/048.gif)
![[064.gif] :smt064](./images/smilies/064.gif)
![[050.gif] :smt050](./images/smilies/050.gif)
