Why are cov/AC so underpowered compared to attack and defense (and to a lesser extent MS)
Alliance rank is meant to be an overall addition of each members power, and each members power is meant to be an addition of ALL of their stats... not just their att/def.
Attack and defense are easy to build up, whereas cov/AC actually take skill as you need a good cov/AC lvl and lots of units (from good UP).
Right now my stats are pretty average, but they sure as hell aren't even.
Offense 921,493,323,459 Ranked: 39
Defense 46,410 billion Ranked: 37
Covert 29,590,124,693 Ranked: 27
Anti-Covert 18,714,438,167 Ranked 19
MotherShip Action 9,064 billion
(39,800,000,000 + 59,800,000,000) Ranked: 30
MS needs to be about 4-5 times more powerful and cov/AC needs to be about.... 600-1000x more powerful...
Either way, at the end of a wave, the top attack should probably be about 50-100% of the power of top defense (e.g. top def = 1,000 - top att should = 500-1000). Top MS should also be 50-100% of top defense. And cov/AC (with half top army trained as spies and half as assassins) should be 80-100% of top defense.
This would make alliance rankings a damn lot fairer.
Unbalanced stats...
- HippyFool
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:13 am
Unbalanced stats...
MSN = paddy_pan@hotmail.com
Naq sold to date: 6168tril
Trade Feedback- http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 8&t=105680
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:06 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Unbalanced stats...
I agree completely though i'd rather see attack / defense 1000 x weaker than covert 1000 time stronger, same result, numbers that are more manageable. I can't be the only one who hates tallying how many 0s are in a number before I can do anything.
Indu and proud of it!!