attacking not worth it.

Locked
User avatar
Psi Kiya Trist
The Timeless One
Posts: 7416
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:56 pm
ID: 4266
Location: Searching for my life in the real world
Contact:
Contact Psi Kiya Trist

Honours and Awards

~Phoenix~ wrote:Want to make attacking worth it?

Easy to do. Make it so if you have 5x the attack of the enemy's defense. You dont get any losses. Like it is when you have 5x the defense of the attacker.

That way. People will increase their strikes. Attacking wil become ever more popular. And people may actualy get their attack's much much higher then defences.


as much as this would help. it would also encourage farming people way lower than your strike. which means, non-active players.

what i think needs to happen, is if it's a fairly CLOSE battle, the odds slip in favor of the attacker. the logic being, that the troops are excited for fighting a good opponent of their skill level. and thus push themselves farther. in addition to the reduced attack costs.

~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~
Image
Image
Image
buck wrote:well psi, upkeeping order in the universe does play its tricks on your mind...
Top
SGC_Sam Fisher
Forum Spammer
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:14 pm
ID: 0
Location: In a ventilation shaft about to infiltrate a terrorist hideout. In other words, a pretty normal day.

Bump.
Image
The forces of SGC_Sam Fisher subdued those of JUAN.
The armies of JUAN were forced out of the realm of SGC_Sam Fisher in a none to glorious fashion! The defending forces were simply too much for them. It is sure that SGC_Sam Fisher will be considering a return visit to JUAN!

Aaaaaawwwwwww Yeeeeaaahhhhh!
Top
Reaver
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:03 pm
ID: 0
Location: Eating you in a canablistic rage

Psi Kiya Trist wrote:what i think needs to happen, is if it's a fairly CLOSE battle, the odds slip in favor of the attacker. the logic being, that the troops are excited for fighting a good opponent of their skill level. and thus push themselves farther. in addition to the reduced attack costs.

~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~


I don't think your idea's bad at all. But just to play the Devil's advocate, couldn't you say that in a close battle the odds should slip in favor of the defenders since they are in a life and death battle to protect their home? Wouldn't that make you even more determined to fight an invading enemy all the more?
Retired from SGW.
Top
urogard
Forum Elder
Posts: 2146
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:05 am
ID: 0
Location: Slovensko

Reaver wrote:
Psi Kiya Trist wrote:what i think needs to happen, is if it's a fairly CLOSE battle, the odds slip in favor of the attacker. the logic being, that the troops are excited for fighting a good opponent of their skill level. and thus push themselves farther. in addition to the reduced attack costs.

~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~


I don't think your idea's bad at all. But just to play the Devil's advocate, couldn't you say that in a close battle the odds should slip in favor of the defenders since they are in a life and death battle to protect their home? Wouldn't that make you even more determined to fight an invading enemy all the more?

1:0 for reaver.
But basically you're both right. Although reaver probably more.
And yet, you just don't know how much you can motivate soldiers to fight and invade foreign countries.....
Top
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”