Nox/Critical

[Juliette]

Would be good if the Critical was cancelled at the same time, and might be a good idea to increase the G&R cost of Nox or add a G&R cost to alert levels to make this happen faster and make people who have finished ascending compete to stay in G&R ranks or prevent them staying permanently on Crit/Nox when off PPT.

It'd be good if it'd happen.

I strongly disagree?

How is anyone who doesn't want to have massive stats, meant to effectively defend themselves, when they dont' get G&R.
And you're aware that, you don't get ANY when Nox is on. So simply staying in G&R won't work, since you'd need to keep re-activating it whenever you got back to 0 G&R. 1 hour off, 5 hours on.

Anyone who relies on the Nox to keep their defences up has made the conscious choice not to participate in the defence arms race. Hey, no judgment here. But I have to agree, if you cannot pay the rent, you are kicked out of your house. Same thing should apply for the Nox.

[Sarevok]

So because you choose not to have a massive attack force so you can farm/raid, not to have an AC force, since you don't kill spies, and haven't spent 100s of trillions on your MS, you shouldn't be protected?

Pretty sure the nox never charged for their services.

And aren't you "paying rent" anyway? Since you loose 10% of your income?

The deduction of G&R was never designed as a payment, more of a limitation of those whom wanted to be in G&R range, but wanted to be protected also.

[Dubby_CompGamerGeek2]

This suggestion by Lord Katsumoto gets the Dubby Common Sense Award.

[Mr Nice Guy]

Just an idea,

If an account is inactive for a certain period of time. Say 30 days for example, if they have nox/critical on, that gets removed. Nox/critical is to protect an account, if the account is no longer active, no need for nox/critical. I don't if this is the case already of if it has already been proposed...but thought it would be a good idea.

Stop wanting to be lazy and take the time to raid someone who has plenty of uu out with nox/crit on.

You are just wanting a way to get uu faster without taking the time to get it. If you dont want to take the time, find someone else to do it and pay them for there time and service.

I don't know who you are, but I don't raid uu, I farm. Laziness has nothing to do with it. Be a jackass in another thread.

Katsumoto be nice to him, he is an omegan dude who s biggest fight in TAF OE war been at forum for last 4 months!

And yes its a great idea, to be honest to raid nox becomes waste of time that at this point of the game shouldnt be just something to waste time.


About Nox removed for G&R dont even care!

[Juliette]

So because you choose not to have a massive attack force so you can farm/raid, not to have an AC force, since you don't kill spies, and haven't spent 100s of trillions on your MS, you shouldn't be protected?

You misread the original premise; Nox is cancelled for inactives.
Inactives are not people who log in and have no stats. Inactives are people who do not log in for 30 days or more.

The GnR debate is a wholly different issue, and should be in another thread if it is to be discussed at all.

[Legendary Apophis]

Said it before and will say it again, accounts inactive for more than a few months should be auto-vacationed, on vacation for over a year should be deleted.

I don't see a single reasion why they should be deleted if they were auto-vacationed. I disagree with you. I would say 6 to 12 months before aut-vacation and never auto delete. That's pure nonsense to autodelete. Or if you prefer, that's an "efficient" way to prevent people who might want to return to the game who did vacate their account to do so. In short, it's a very bad idea.

[Mr Nice Guy]

Vacation and deleting doesnt help at all the new members. Just the Nox part is ok!

[Sarevok]

So because you choose not to have a massive attack force so you can farm/raid, not to have an AC force, since you don't kill spies, and haven't spent 100s of trillions on your MS, you shouldn't be protected?

You misread the original premise; Nox is cancelled for inactives.
Inactives are not people who log in and have no stats. Inactives are people who do not log in for 30 days or more.

The GnR debate is a wholly different issue, and should be in another thread if it is to be discussed at all.

Sure, though if you look, I wasn't quoting the start post, only the additional idea of it being cancelled when no G&R available. Which I said I strongly disagreed with. You then commented on my disagreement and it went from there.

PS: On the idea of it being cancelled on inactives. I think I'm leaning towards No. It takes time to do, and so larger accounts search for better returns. Leaving as is, would mean that there are accounts which new players can raid, and would be more willing to wait the time delay, since the yield is a much larger % of their army size.