Field Marshall wrote:Dexter Morgan™ wrote:Benifit of doubt stops when its across countries anonomously from a comp screen.
Scam once shame on you, scam twice, shame on gw community...should be common sense i would think to not ever trust sumone who is a known liar and thief...but that is just me..
So if Daku borrowed 100t went Inactive for 6 months, came back, paid you with interest and apologised...you wouldn't trust him?
Thats kinda different, where as a few scammers have been active and never reply back to the person they scammed or a scammer who says they will pay it back but always goes offline as soon as the other person comes online.
I am not talking like I know everything.Eärendil wrote:I love how people who have had no involvement with ak are talking like they know everything, pretty enjoyable really.
Correct, AK is just an example.SuperSaiyan wrote:This thread isn't about AK.
I think rudy was just using it as an example.
I believe the topic is whether or not someone (anyone) should be considered a scammer, after they make reparations.
In the linked thread, I had posted that AK has scammed in the past and letting the seller be warned of anything that might cause the sell to go bad.
FM says his friend scammed but not no more, Ear says AK scammed, but paid back. But Almost38 scammed Borek out of his account which later was given back, but everyone or seems like everyone(mainly from FS) is quick to call him a scammer and what not.
Even though Almost gave back what he took and AK did the same thing(in way), but yet 1 is called a scammer while the other is not. Though both did give back.









![[081.gif] :smt081](./images/smilies/081.gif)















<3 ya
it will come back and bite you sooner or later



![[078.gif] :smt078](./images/smilies/078.gif)