Separate Anti-Covert from Attack

Should Anti-Covert be separate to Attack?

Yes - Completely separate
15
39%
Yes - Should have the choice to send anti-covert (or not) when attacking
17
45%
No - It is fine as it is.
6
16%
 
Total votes: 38
User avatar
Londo Mollari
Lawnmower
Posts: 5466
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:15 am
Alliance: Serenity
Race: Jinchuriki
Location: Wherever Wally is
Contact:

yeah i am with Wolf on this 1, i really h8 anti-covert! cos now i need to spend twice as much on spy levels, i think that instead, when u spy on some 1, if u r succesfull then a set amount of spies are kept in the enemies realm and give u random reports and do random sabotages etc!
and sorry if this off topic lol
Mordack wrote: I'd probably go gay for Benjamin Linus. He's everything I want to be.
Speaking as a Mod
User avatar
fredrabbit
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:58 pm
Alliance: HVE
Race: ?
ID: 20938
Alternate name(s): *TheBetterIdiot
Location: If there is a bright spot to the univers the place farest from it.

How often do you mass peoples covert away...cause unless i want to destroy someones covert i do not see a reason to have anticovert agents trained at all. They do not protect your from other peoples anti caovert all they do is kill other peoples spies. So there is no reason to have them trained up at all. And if you say i have them trained for rank well unless your anti covert is the same or higher than your covert they are not as good as spies. So what if it cost you extra naq to mass someone's covert away it should you are pretty muck killing there account for a while, it should be something that takes a cost on your side.
Image
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”