xXxsephirothxXx wrote:Rudy Pena wrote:xXxsephirothxXx wrote:Rudy Pena wrote:Subject: Loaning naq with %HellSinG wrote:I loan you 100 tril/or more,
you give me back 120/more in exactly 1 month 
thats 20% feed, like the government has in real world xD
I think its all legit,
if you do not return, you're marked as scamer and well
we all know what happens to scammers
All the trades and stuff will be posted here publicly!
Post if anyone interested,
~H~
This was the thread made by Hell. As you can see, he says exactly 1 month. Then he will post, though since he did it 10 days later.....20 days short of the deal/contract. Fen had to right to repay him back as Hell was breaking the deal first.
Ummm no... He says if you don't pay it back you will be marked as a scammer...? With the evidence against Fenrir, is there no just reason to conclude that he was not going to pay it back?
Never was it mentioned that IF he didn't pay back
in a month he would be labeled a scammer... nor was it mentioned that he would do it via a thread...? Read between the lines...
He said specifically,
if you DONT pay it back....
And read the bolded and underlined i just made.
Hell did say people would be called a scammer if people didnt pay in 1 month. Marked and called is the same thing.
Read carefully. I know its hard for you. But maybe you should get that text to speech thingy on your laptop to help you out.

Try using that logic in a legal document... maybe that's why apple lost against microsoft in the legal battle all that time ago
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
AT&T uses a similar logic.

You get a contract with them, but if you break it you have to pay more.
But in this case, Hell broke it. which means Fen doesnt have to pay
I would love to see someone break there contract with AT&T and win the fight of not paying the fine for breaking the contract, but have At&T paying it.
