ربهالنوع wrote:Because, dear Jimmy, no one in their right mind would fight the changes in progress.
So NWO-conspiracy yappers have adopted Paul as "their candidate".
Did Ron Paul ever speak out against the NWO? Does Ron Paul say "OMG THAT NWO IS TEH BAD BURN IT!"? You know the answer.
Well,
Ron Paul spoke against "the System", which is blamed by some to be the cause why the Economy is in bad shape, and his points happen to meet the "anti-NWO" points of what would be a better system than current system. As people know NWO isn't a party (I was just making a joke about it, I know it's not a party), so obviously he will not speak against the "NWO" because the entity nominated so, doesn't have a commonly-accepted denomination. But, his program appears to fight the bureacratic-lobbyist establishment-corporate system that is named "NWO" by the anti-NWO people, but said name cannot be considered as the generally accepted name. Thus, politicians who might fight this "system", wouldn't necessarily call it "NWO" among reasons being that they would be branded as conspiracy theorists if they did call it so. Which they'd prefer to avoid if they want wide-recognizing and more support in the elections. However, it doesn't seem to be sufficient in Ron Paul's case to gather Republican voters to support him.
My explanation as to why I called him the "anti NWO" candidate.