^_^
- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6112
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
^_^
^_^
Last edited by Field Marshall on Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:16 am, edited 3 times in total.
Sol wrote:Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
-
~LordRse~
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2612
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:45 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Prophet
- ID: 79075
- Alternate name(s): "Bringer of Rain"
- Location: The Netherlands!
- Drought
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:52 am
- ID: 0
- Location: dde
- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6112
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
Re: What is wrong with the game.
Duck Dodgers wrote:I would add account trading to that list.
So would I...
Sol wrote:Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: What is wrong with the game.
I disagree with few points (fifth mainly), but overall, it's a well thought analysis about why this game isn't going the right way.
$$$ ingame market is not really the problem considering prices are "high" there compared to players' selling prices. Problem would be the naq that came from cheating/bug exploit/script use which caused devaluation.
$$$ ingame market is not really the problem considering prices are "high" there compared to players' selling prices. Problem would be the naq that came from cheating/bug exploit/script use which caused devaluation.
Last edited by Legendary Apophis on Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
- Aisar Saqib
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:26 pm
- Alliance: TF HC
- Race: TF
- ID: 1912374
- Alternate name(s): ASJ, messenger of death,deadily knight,lord cyrus..
- Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Re: What is wrong with the game.
kudos to FM for this post

Most Slaughters: 70 by ASJ
Trade feedback:
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=191582
SGW awards and past sigs:
Spoiler







- EbilCC
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:19 pm
- ID: 0
Re: What is wrong with the game.
things need a cap level
eg MS needs capped covert levels need capped to 39 each something realistic for most players to attain
eg MS needs capped covert levels need capped to 39 each something realistic for most players to attain
- Drought
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:52 am
- ID: 0
- Location: dde
Re: What is wrong with the game.
CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:things need a cap level
eg MS needs capped covert levels need capped to 39 each something realistic for most players to attain
Bann account trading, and likely far less accounts would have even gone that high with their levels ...
The idea they can make a quick buck back form their investment makes it an easier choice to do.

a very bad hairdo

- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6112
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
Re: What is wrong with the game.
Duck Dodgers wrote:CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:things need a cap level
eg MS needs capped covert levels need capped to 39 each something realistic for most players to attain
Bann account trading, and likely far less accounts would have even gone that high with their levels ...
The idea they can make a quick buck back form their investment makes it an easier choice to do.
I think that capping would have worked a year ago, however, the game was made that if you made significant investment, you would be far stronger than the next account. To go back on that, would kill off another 10% of the active players. I don't know what the answer is or if capping would work. The way it is at the moment, it is a complete barrier to entry.
I agree with DD. Account trading, swapping and sharing is prohibited in many games. Should never have been allowed in the first place.
Sol wrote:Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
- EbilCC
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:19 pm
- ID: 0
Re: What is wrong with the game.
well in fairness there would be more players quitting who cant compete at all with those levels. people dont even mass me anymore i have for eg built one trillion defences in my current war they try to mass give up and sab it away with high covert levels
high covert levels encourages people to build less defence if u dont have them to compete
high covert levels encourages people to build less defence if u dont have them to compete
-
RepliMagni
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
- Alliance: Loner :P
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1908448
Re: What is wrong with the game.
Duck Dodgers wrote:CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:things need a cap level
eg MS needs capped covert levels need capped to 39 each something realistic for most players to attain
Bann account trading, and likely far less accounts would have even gone that high with their levels ...
The idea they can make a quick buck back form their investment makes it an easier choice to do.
Hardly. Accounts never go for the same amount as the component naq which went into them. If you ban account trading, people would just sell more resources. Ban resources selling and people will take it to msn.
Cap? What goals will people have? They will just use excess naq to either 1) sell or 2) mass.
Perhaps something like reducing the advantage gained. So covert lvls don't increase by as much with each purchase. Reduces the distance between c.38 and c.41.
Perhaps making growing/investing a double-edged blade. Thus for each covert lvl you have, your UP is reduced. Or there is a power differential when attacking other accounts.

- Field Marshall
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6112
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
Re: What is wrong with the game.
RepliMagni wrote:Duck Dodgers wrote:CCexyDCapedCrusader wrote:things need a cap level
eg MS needs capped covert levels need capped to 39 each something realistic for most players to attain
Bann account trading, and likely far less accounts would have even gone that high with their levels ...
The idea they can make a quick buck back form their investment makes it an easier choice to do.
Hardly. Accounts never go for the same amount as the component naq which went into them. If you ban account trading, people would just sell more resources. Ban resources selling and people will take it to msn.
Cap? What goals will people have? They will just use excess naq to either 1) sell or 2) mass.
Perhaps something like reducing the advantage gained. So covert lvls don't increase by as much with each purchase. Reduces the distance between c.38 and c.41.
Perhaps making growing/investing a double-edged blade. Thus for each covert lvl you have, your UP is reduced. Or there is a power differential when attacking other accounts.
With everything Repli, enough policing would be able to control this. Other games can cope with it. This game picks up a lot more revenue per person than most. IP checks are relatively straight forward. Conditions can be put in place.
After 6 years, I still have not reached my maximum. Capping at this level is hardly saying that there are no goals for me. Try the same as ascended achievements, DDE have an excellent scheme "rookie central". Sorry Repli, but there are other options that continuing to move the goalposts for new players.
Double edged sword? Most people fail to understand the complexities of the game as it is, you want to introduce another complex change of abilities? Seriously recommend against that. However, I must admit, it is an alternative to capping..
Sol wrote:Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.my first sigging. I sigged you too. <3
High Empty wrote:however people shouldn't have lvl 33 and 200mil spies and try to be in the top 10, it's unhealthy.
-
Gandy 181
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:58 pm
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 44650
- Location: Round the corner
Re: What is wrong with the game.
Fm I have to say gd post although I have do e when I needed to get where my account is and fm u knw how I did it
But I agree with more a less all of it, as the reason why new players **Filtered** off so quick is that it will take them two yrs to even try get a decent account and that's after they been massed and ridiculed
But I agree with more a less all of it, as the reason why new players **Filtered** off so quick is that it will take them two yrs to even try get a decent account and that's after they been massed and ridiculed


-
RepliMagni
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:29 am
- Alliance: Loner :P
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1908448
Re: What is wrong with the game.
What do you cap at then? People have already gone to c41? 2mil raw UP? What n00b can catch that or compete with that player in the next couple of years?
Cap at something more realistic? 39/39, 1mil raw up, etc. But what do these players do with excess naq/uu? I'm genuinely curious - because if they have no place to invest it, the only other option is conspicuous consumption, which in this game involves either selling it or warring - both of which fuel the problem of player retention.
I see no problem with continuously progressing the frontier - but the frontier should never be so far distant that the game becomes uncompetitive for newer players. I'm personally against creating ceilings - just not convinced there is then an incentive for long-term players to keep evolving their accounts...
Cap at something more realistic? 39/39, 1mil raw up, etc. But what do these players do with excess naq/uu? I'm genuinely curious - because if they have no place to invest it, the only other option is conspicuous consumption, which in this game involves either selling it or warring - both of which fuel the problem of player retention.
I see no problem with continuously progressing the frontier - but the frontier should never be so far distant that the game becomes uncompetitive for newer players. I'm personally against creating ceilings - just not convinced there is then an incentive for long-term players to keep evolving their accounts...

-
Gandy 181
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:58 pm
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 44650
- Location: Round the corner
Re: What is wrong with the game.
Honestly repli what I see happening is one person buys say 41 then anouther does just cause the other has it ad then a few more do it's a man thing honestly I am better than u loool
Now to solve that would be a really gd fact as I can actually see someone buying 42 soon just to show off
Now to solve that would be a really gd fact as I can actually see someone buying 42 soon just to show off






