Selling naq for $ has been allowed until era 31, admin himself said it was ok. How is it a loophole if he said it was ok? Yes he also said feeding was ok, but he banned feeding, he still deemed selling naq for $ being ok until era 31.
Same effect as someone who had 5 friends registered and had gotten all of the naq they farmed explicitly for that person? First off - anyone could have bought my naq, opposed to people farming naq for a specific person, secondly it was cleared by admin that it was ok, and thirdly, it is not much different than USS, the money is paid to a person for ingame goods, if it's paid to admin - the ingame goods come out of nowhere, if it was paid to someone else, the ingame goods had to be farmed first and time had to be spent for farming. So going by that logic USS is the same as feeding, as it has the same effect after all, don't you think? Yet you don't seem to have a problem with USSs having given such ridiculous bonuses in the past.
USSs were also not limited until the buying of them ran out of control all those years ago. Again, I don't seem to find many people who have a problem with that.
Well I don't know if I was the only one, but I probably was the only one who was massed on other SGW servers due to it
You also still don't seem to distinguish between two different things, selling naq for $ (which can only be mistaken with USSs, if anything) and feeding. If selling (and thus buying) naq for $ was a loophole, then so was USSs giving ingame bonuses (not small, might I add).
It was worth a lot compared to USS because the game was broken. It was the other way round first. In pretty much every other era, USS gave naq that would take weeks and weeks to farm. Yet $ for naq to one person are wrong(er) than $ for naq, ATs and UUs and bank increase straight to admin.
Why would I refuse to sell to the people? Anyone could have bought my naq, remember? As you said, people were turned away from buying my naq, people that would otherwise be interested in it, because they were afraid of being massed.
Also the funniest thing there is is that after I started taking out huge chunks of naq at random times and letting random people take it, the same people who voiced how wrong it was what I was doing, same people were asking me to give that naq to them, to tell them exactly when I'll take it out. Hypocrisy, no? Of course, not all of those who voiced against me wanted that naq, but a pretty large percentage wanted it.
@Isaac - yeah it's a log of naq attacks
~Jack
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
