Yo
- HippyFool
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:13 am
Re: Yo
As far as i know.... Priests currently do not die from anything.
![Image](http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr222/radar9077/hippy.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL2.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL1.png)
MSN = paddy_pan@hotmail.com
Naq sold to date: 6168tril
Trade Feedback- http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 8&t=105680
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Yo
Umm.. yes, they do.HippyFool wrote:As far as i know.... Priests currently do not die from anything.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/4T1bURx.png)
- HippyFool
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:13 am
Re: Yo
Bromas wrote:HippyFool wrote:As far as i know.... Priests currently do not die from anything.
Juliette literally just said they do...
Juliette wrote:Umm.. yes, they do.HippyFool wrote:As far as i know.... Priests currently do not die from anything.They die when your defence is overpowered by a combined MS and ground attack force.
Well, I suggest you both go and try to kill some priests... I bet you can't.
I am aware that they are SUPPOSED to die. I am simply saying that they do not.
![Image](http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr222/radar9077/hippy.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL2.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL1.png)
MSN = paddy_pan@hotmail.com
Naq sold to date: 6168tril
Trade Feedback- http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 8&t=105680
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Yo
HippyFool wrote:Well, I suggest you both go and try to kill some priests... I bet you can't.
I am aware that they are SUPPOSED to die. I am simply saying that they do not.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Unless you are saying that in the past month, a bug has appeared which disallows Priests to die? In which case I wonder why this is the first I am hearing of this.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/4T1bURx.png)
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:44 am
- ID: 97472
- Alternate name(s): ~HydroFlux™~, Reinhardt
Re: Yo
Juliette wrote:HippyFool wrote:Well, I suggest you both go and try to kill some priests... I bet you can't.
I am aware that they are SUPPOSED to die. I am simply saying that they do not.Then how come I have lost literally thousands of Priests to attackers since the game started?
Riddle me that, Batman.
Unless you are saying that in the past month, a bug has appeared which disallows Priests to die? In which case I wonder why this is the first I am hearing of this.
It would be because we don't want our priests to die
![Image](http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a174/Kiane_Azura/sigstop1ow9.gif)
- HippyFool
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:13 am
Re: Yo
Juliette wrote:HippyFool wrote:Well, I suggest you both go and try to kill some priests... I bet you can't.
I am aware that they are SUPPOSED to die. I am simply saying that they do not.Then how come I have lost literally thousands of Priests to attackers since the game started?
Riddle me that, Batman.
Unless you are saying that in the past month, a bug has appeared which disallows Priests to die? In which case I wonder why this is the first I am hearing of this.
It worked at the start. Broke awhile ago. LoT mentioned it on hrre ages ago i think but noone did anything about it. When i am not on my phone i will try to find the thread.
![Image](http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr222/radar9077/hippy.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL2.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL1.png)
MSN = paddy_pan@hotmail.com
Naq sold to date: 6168tril
Trade Feedback- http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 8&t=105680
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Yo
That is blitzkrieg.Slim87R wrote:I believe this is the post hippy was thinking of:
viewtopic.php?f=290&t=194857
Feel like a sir.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Think :-k](./images/smilies/eusa_think.gif)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/4T1bURx.png)
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:42 pm
Re: Yo
Then maybe that wasn't the right post. However, this brings up questions.
Why would Attack kill priests where Blitzkrieg does not? I mean the point of blitzkrieg is to destroy right? To make someone pay and to slow their growth as much as possible? Attacking is just there as a means to steal someones naq and destroy MS. It makes more sense that blitzkrieg should be the destructive one killing priests while Attacking should be there as a means to get something, not purely destruction.
Just my .02
Why would Attack kill priests where Blitzkrieg does not? I mean the point of blitzkrieg is to destroy right? To make someone pay and to slow their growth as much as possible? Attacking is just there as a means to steal someones naq and destroy MS. It makes more sense that blitzkrieg should be the destructive one killing priests while Attacking should be there as a means to get something, not purely destruction.
Just my .02
![Image](http://shrani.si/f/M/iN/P1SWkSZ/1-slim87r.png)
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Yo
Dearie, I did say Blitz also should kill them if it works properly. Which it does not currently, but it will in January when a bunch of things get fixed. Hence the need to make sure what is up with this "Priests don't die" thing.Slim87R wrote:Then maybe that wasn't the right post. However, this brings up questions.
Why would Attack kill priests where Blitzkrieg does not? I mean the point of blitzkrieg is to destroy right? To make someone pay and to slow their growth as much as possible? Attacking is just there as a means to steal someones naq and destroy MS. It makes more sense that blitzkrieg should be the destructive one killing priests while Attacking should be there as a means to get something, not purely destruction.
Just my .02
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/4T1bURx.png)
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:42 pm
Re: Yo
Juliette wrote:Dearie, I did say Blitz also should kill them if it works properly. Which it does not currently, but it will in January when a bunch of things get fixed. Hence the need to make sure what is up with this "Priests don't die" thing.Slim87R wrote:Then maybe that wasn't the right post. However, this brings up questions.
Why would Attack kill priests where Blitzkrieg does not? I mean the point of blitzkrieg is to destroy right? To make someone pay and to slow their growth as much as possible? Attacking is just there as a means to steal someones naq and destroy MS. It makes more sense that blitzkrieg should be the destructive one killing priests while Attacking should be there as a means to get something, not purely destruction.
Just my .02
Well, when you do eventually get around to it, I think blitzkrieg should definitely be more destructive to that end. I don't think many priests should die unless overwhelmed in attack, and even then blitz should always kill more. It also makes sense balance wise. In attack you get naq +a little destruction, in blitz you get no naq + a little more destruction. You have to take turn expenditure into account of course.
![Image](http://shrani.si/f/M/iN/P1SWkSZ/1-slim87r.png)
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Yo
It will be worth it as long as your enemy has enough troops to kill, same as massing someone with regular attacks.Slim87R wrote:Well, when you do eventually get around to it, I think blitzkrieg should definitely be more destructive to that end. I don't think many priests should die unless overwhelmed in attack, and even then blitz should always kill more. It also makes sense balance wise. In attack you get naq +a little destruction, in blitz you get no naq + a little more destruction. You have to take turn expenditure into account of course.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/4T1bURx.png)
- HippyFool
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 6:13 am
Re: Yo
Blitz does not work, but normal attacks also do not kill priests.
Waiting for someone to prove me wrong.![Whistle :-"](./images/smilies/eusa_whistle.gif)
Waiting for someone to prove me wrong.
![Whistle :-"](./images/smilies/eusa_whistle.gif)
![Image](http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr222/radar9077/hippy.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL2.png)
![Image](http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e270/kapri42/Awards/2008-HIPPYFOOL1.png)
MSN = paddy_pan@hotmail.com
Naq sold to date: 6168tril
Trade Feedback- http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 8&t=105680
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)