tade-able Gnr

[Slim87R]

Normally I'd be against it, but quite honestly at this point.... why not?
You don't earn GnR anymore, you build barely any stats and sit in the ranks surrounded mostly by in-actives for 21 days. Hardly glorious, hardly reputation building. GnR no longer respects itself, so why not?

Especially considering you can buy the damn ascensions with cash anyway.
Might as well make GNR attainable in other ways too... so its fair for those that don't want to blow money and would rather farm to get the ascensions faster.

+1

You guys are talking about GnR having to be earnt when it can be bought? Kind of a circular argument isn't it?

[Shezmu]

Glory and reputation by its own name is meant to be earnt. You earn your own reputation and gain glory from it. Sure, once you have it, you can spend it in different ways, but you cant buy your way to glory/reputation.

Exactly. The entire point of GnR is earning it.

I may be new here but I've been playing since 06' and while there are some valid points I must say I agree that GnR should be earned, so instead of creating yet another market maybe there could be achievements like in Ascended with the rewards being GnR. This seems the most balanced solution based on the comments posted here so far.

[~wilco~]

I agree some acheivements to get g'n'r would be great for example building a defence ms etc

Being part of bloodwar would get alliances to get into bloodwars

[curtthehurt1]

I agree some acheivements to get g'n'r would be great for example building a defence ms etc

Being part of bloodwar would get alliances to get into bloodwars

do like a 50 G&R reward just for participating in a blood war? 100 if you are on the winning side? maybe even factor in an MVP that gets 200? that would be an idea.

[Sol]

I agree some acheivements to get g'n'r would be great for example building a defence ms etc

Ascended achievements © 2011-2012

[BenjaminMS]

In all seriousness - was (besides a complete server reset) trading G&R not one of the 4-5 points or so Jason said which would never happen unless he felt like doing as of his own accord, and not by 'popular demand'?

[Visentinel]

then make it so you can only trade GNR to someone in the rank range of GNR per turn.
a person sending GNR can be any rank, a person receiving GNR must be at or above the GNR rank.

this idea rocks.