Juliettes Attitude

[Tetrismonkey]

Section 5: Language
e. Criminal Content/Activity
The SGW forums are not the place for discussing or facilitating criminal activity. This includes arranging to carry out a crime or the posting of illegal content (including copyrighted property). In deciding illegality, common sense is used: If it is illegal in the majority of countries, Admins/Mods will see it as illegal on the Forum.

Would it not have fallen into this category?

[Sol]

Section 5: Language
e. Criminal Content/Activity
The SGW forums are not the place for discussing or facilitating criminal activity. This includes arranging to carry out a crime or the posting of illegal content (including copyrighted property). In deciding illegality, common sense is used: If it is illegal in the majority of countries, Admins/Mods will see it as illegal on the Forum.

Would it not have fallen into this category?

It wouldn't technically be facilitating criminal activity though. Can't say I know the laws in Canada but you would be using the personal log 'as it was meant', except 'as it was meant' was a bit flawed. While it meant no harm, it could have (and most likely would have).

[Psyko]

If you delegated the task to someone else you might want to have words considering nothing has happened to the posts/topic

Ill one up you on that Andy, she should have named who she delegated it to and given you a general time frame of when that person would resolve the issue and inform you.

Judgement was delegated to the Section Admins, primarily myself, with Juliette's suggestions on what should be done with the thread. I agreed with the proposed actions and gave Juliette permission to go forward with it, as I am currently working long days and am unable to do that much modding at one time. We've yet to hear from every admin on the issue.

Things fell through the cracks as the discussion then turned on rules and phrasing. That pretty much sums everything up as far as modding that thread goes.

As to Juliette's comments, if she doesn't have to say something, we all pretty much know she'll give 1 or 2-word answers. It comes off as brisk and rude, depending on what you expected from her. It's neither out of character, or an intentional slight against a particular user.

[~wolverine~]

is this really what you guys spend your time doing these days? jeezus

[Bromas]

I didn't say she was disrespectful, I said she was lazy <3

[Psyko]

is this really what you guys spend your time doing these days? jeezus

No. I pretty much spend my days working my ass off.

I didn't say she was disrespectful, I said she was lazy <3

Fair enough. Still inaccurate.

[~Odin~]

Well I'm never getting that time back lol.

[Bromas]

Oh and IMO Jo is one of the better mods on these boards when compared to the likes of Niem. That jackass pulls **Filtered** out of thin air and thinks he can mod how he sees fit. Rules, guidelines, nah, those don't apply to awesome Niem!

I'd gladly explain why I modded in the first place and the authority I have over my section, and even what other SAs said about the warning but it's a bit over your security clearance and I, unlike you, don't leak info from mod/admin forums elsewhere.

And frankly sweepie, you had an issue with me before I was given any staff role and you had an issue with me before me and you had any direct contact whatsoever. You know that, I know that. We both know why. Heck you have an issue with a lot of things, while you are a peach yourself, aren't you? One that always do what's right and one that got deleted by doing everything for the well-being of forum and community, right?
Everyone on these forums knows you have a personal vendettas against pretty much everyone that's not allied to you, as soon as anyone does anything you don't like, they are biased and the worst. QQ.

Anyway, Juliette brought the thread to the attention of all SAs and any discussion of abusing the game's loopholes to change stuff within the game can not be tolerated on these forums. It was the right call to close it down.
If you have a suggestion - make admin J aware of it. Want alternative GUI or calcs ingame? Let admin J know. If you have any material (coding/images/etc.) you think is usable - feel free to share it with admin J and I'm sure he'll be grateful for the help. Abusing the loopholes to force something in the game that he has not authorized is not something that he'd be grateful for.

But then again I am apparently the worst staff member ever (even though I must be good at being the worst - I didn't get deleted for it) so what do I know.

~N

why is the forum a seperate entity to the game when bannings are taken place yet it does not seem to be seperate in this case?

is this really what you guys spend your time doing these days? jeezus

No. I pretty much spend my days working my ass off.

I didn't say she was disrespectful, I said she was lazy <3

Fair enough. Still inaccurate.

Well not really, when I was a mod it was expected of us to explain what our follow-through on something was going to be. If I locked a topic and was asked if I were to follow part of it up I was expected to say who/when/what would be happening

[atok]

i like her attitude she could dominate me anytime

[Rudy Peña]

i like her attitude she could dominate me anytime

For all youknow, she can be a 500 pounder women....lol

[Bromas]

i like her attitude she could dominate me anytime

For all youknow, she can be a 500 pounder women....lol

For all we know she's a horselime

[harchester]

i like her attitude she could dominate me anytime

For all youknow, she can be a 500 pounder women....lol

but I bet she tastes soo good?

on aside note I like Jullz and neim