Sol wrote:
Why don't you allow more leniency in your warnings?

We all want to slap someone over the internet, but surely once or twice doesn't hurt xD
Hmm. This is difficult to pin down, so I'm going to use an analogy.
The forum rules regarding masking are explicit. According to the forum rules, (outside GC), every single example of masking must be given a warning point. There is no verbal warning to be given, it is the stated consequence, decided on by the Admins for this forum.
You could, feasibly, use that as a 'guideline', and use your personal judgement as to when you believe masking was 'meant' to be offensive, or wasn't accidental. In some cases, you could issue verbal warnings, and in others, full warnings.
One of the first complaints from users upon receiving a warning is i) Why was I warned for X, when another user wasn't? Given the different personalities, backgrounds and styles among the moderators, you would likely find some would given warnings, and some wouldn't, for the same example.
This is, I think, why the consequences are there. Whether they are right or wrong, to provide a consistency among the forum staff. And so, I keep to the forum rules, and their stated consequences, as closely as possible. Sometimes, this is seen as harsh, and sometimes its seen as biased. But, there are two sides, or more to every argument. Leniant to one, is unfair to another. Harsh to one, is 'just' to another.