Greetings, players!
Someone has submitted StarGateWars to our listing and we are glad to have you on board. The more ratings it will get, the higher in the listing GateWars will crawl, bringing more new players.
If you like the game and wish to help it, rate it 5 stars and leave a positive review:
http://newrpg.com/browser-games/stargatewars/
Kind regards,
NewRPG team
StarGateWars ratings
-
Boa
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:40 am
- ID: 0
Re: StarGateWars ratings
Rated
Spoiler
billzebud™ wrote:yes indeed I did call you an idiot(at least twice in two different languages), because trying to talk to you is like talking to a wall.
Edit: damn sorry, I cant seem to help myself.... must. not. feed. the. troll........
-
Theon35
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:13 pm
Re: StarGateWars ratings
Rated 
...
...-
Quina Quen
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4563
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:22 pm
- Alternate name(s): Diamond Dust
Re: StarGateWars ratings
Hmm, this looks like a suspiciously bot-like post.
The ascended entity formerly known as Diamond Dust
-
Clockwork
- The Ablest Man
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:07 pm
- Alliance: Multiverse
- Race: Clockwork Admin
- ID: 1940718
Re: StarGateWars ratings
No, it's fine. Quite a popular site and might grab the attention of a few new players.General Riviera wrote:Hmm, this looks like a suspiciously bot-like post.
-
Immortal Soul
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:05 am
- ID: 21207
- Location: Australia
-
ƒëmmë
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:44 am
- Alternate name(s): ƒëmmë ƒatalë
temptress
cleo_catra
Re: StarGateWars ratings
Good to know, I did find it a bit suss too.. some random newbie posting a random link to a random site and all.Clockwork wrote:No, it's fine. Quite a popular site and might grab the attention of a few new players.General Riviera wrote:Hmm, this looks like a suspiciously bot-like post.
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
-Sun Tzu, the Art of War
31/07/2012 6:13:16 AM Hope Light ID's mean nothing imo if you can back yourself up.
31/07/2012 6:13:22 AM Hope Light only **Filtered** hide them.
31/07/2012 6:13:22 AM Hope Light only **Filtered** hide them.
Be careful who you trust, even the devil was once an angel
veritas vos liberabit
Forums own rules
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 7#p2510387
Spoiler
Section Admins - who will be 'in charge' of the section in question. They will be responsible for the overall feel of the section, the setup/structure, and most importantly the community/users in the section. This will incorporate the old 'ombudsman' role. And insofar as the Section Admin is responsible for the users, they are also responsible for the high level mod behaviour towards the users.
So -as a user - if you have an issue with how you are treated, rules, bans, whatever --goto the section admin... They are there for you!
There is no 'reporting structure' in this setup -- tech, mod, and section admins are all on equal footing, each with their own (somewhat overlapping) responsibilities.
Mods report directly to the mod admin, and indirectly to the section admin for the section in which they mod.
So -as a user - if you have an issue with how you are treated, rules, bans, whatever --goto the section admin... They are there for you!
There is no 'reporting structure' in this setup -- tech, mod, and section admins are all on equal footing, each with their own (somewhat overlapping) responsibilities.
Mods report directly to the mod admin, and indirectly to the section admin for the section in which they mod.