There is a chance that when someone is relying on PPT, extraneous circumstances will prevent them capatalising on it just before it ends. Then when it does run out, all their naq-on-hand is just sitting there asking to be taken.
Therefore I propose a safety net. If, when PPT is about to end, your naq-on-hand is greater than your bank max capacity (regardless of actual naq-in-bank) then your realm goes into stasis (and the\us stops generating naquadah and units) and you remain in PPT. As soon as naq-on-hand is reduced below bank max capacity, the PPT expires and the stasis ends.
Of course there would have to be a maximum limit. Perhaps PPT stasis would automatically run out after five days, and leave you to the vultures.
This is intended to protect against a short term interruption - eg ISP going down, computer break down or virus infection, called away for family emergency, stuck in traffic, or merely overslept. It wont protect against a major calamity such as being admitted to hospital, but if that is the case then I think your SGW account is the least of your concerns.
PPT safetynet
- Psi Kiya Trist
- The Timeless One
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:56 pm
- ID: 4266
- Location: Searching for my life in the real world
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: PPT safetynet
tiera wrote:There is a chance that when someone is relying on PPT, extraneous circumstances will prevent them capatalising on it just before it ends. Then when it does run out, all their naq-on-hand is just sitting there asking to be taken.
Therefore I propose a safety net. If, when PPT is about to end, your naq-on-hand is greater than your bank max capacity (regardless of actual naq-in-bank) then your realm goes into stasis and you remain in PPT. As soon as naq-on-hand is reduced below bank max capacity, the PPT expires and the stasis ends.
Of course there would have to be a maximum limit. Perhaps PPT stasis would automatically run out after five days, and leave you to the vultures.
firstly, no...
this would make people have 7 days worth of ppt for the cost of 2.
secondly, NO...
everyone who is already complaining about people being on PPT too much will kill this idea.
thirdly, NO!
you want to reduce risk? play a differant game... this game is about taking risk.
~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~
-just my three cents-


buck wrote:well psi, upkeeping order in the universe does play its tricks on your mind...
-
BombedDeer
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:35 am
- ID: 0
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
No - and, why?
You know you have a certain amount of time whilst in ppt - so it is your responsibility to ensure that you have banked/used the naq before ppt runs out - if you don't - tough luck!
You know you have a certain amount of time whilst in ppt - so it is your responsibility to ensure that you have banked/used the naq before ppt runs out - if you don't - tough luck!
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
hidden
- Lord of Chickens
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:25 am
- ID: 0
- Location: in the chickens command centre
firstly
no
watch stargate sg-1 if your on the protected planets trety you cant be attacked so then logicly if you get taken off it its effects disappear so logicly you could be attacked
secondly
yes
it would mean more ppl would get it so sgw would get more money so we would get more updates
so if the extra money would go to something usful i will say yes if it doesnt i will say no
no
watch stargate sg-1 if your on the protected planets trety you cant be attacked so then logicly if you get taken off it its effects disappear so logicly you could be attacked
secondly
yes
it would mean more ppl would get it so sgw would get more money so we would get more updates
so if the extra money would go to something usful i will say yes if it doesnt i will say no
Wolf359 wrote:I agree with hidden
-
Sleipnir
- Merriest Mod in the West
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:16 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Off-world
-
Honours and Awards
No.
No no no.
Why do people keep asking for more PPT? We actually need less PPT, preferably even no PPT. But that would effectively shut off the money flow. So, the PPT we have now is a necessary evil, but we certainly don't need more of it.
In case someone missed the point....NO!!!

No no no.
Why do people keep asking for more PPT? We actually need less PPT, preferably even no PPT. But that would effectively shut off the money flow. So, the PPT we have now is a necessary evil, but we certainly don't need more of it.
In case someone missed the point....NO!!!

As soon as you build an idiot proof system, somebody else builds a better idiot.
If it moves, kill it. If it doesn't move, kick it until it does move, and then kill it.
-
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
- ID: 0
-
Quina Quen
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4563
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:22 pm
- Alternate name(s): Diamond Dust
-
WhiteyDude
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:44 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: SGC Australia
- Contact:
SGC_Replicators wrote:let me get this striaght
u want paying customers to feel a "little" risk when they buy SS?
customers?...
Ergh..
How bout NO scotty?
Shhh!!!
www.shh.com/org
I got a whole bag of shhh with your name on it!
You want to stop me from watching you cunning PPTers 24/7 waiting for you to come off PPT so I can take you out?...
/Whitey
SHIFT TONE! OMG!
STFUBBQ?
SGW-irc founder

It means Perseverance
STFUBBQ?
SGW-irc founder

It means Perseverance
-
CthulhuSpawn
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:11 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Haunting the Bookclub
Re: PPT safetynet
tiera wrote:There is a chance that when someone is relying on PPT, extraneous circumstances will prevent them capatalising on it just before it ends. Then when it does run out, all their naq-on-hand is just sitting there asking to be taken.
Therefore I propose a safety net. If, when PPT is about to end, your naq-on-hand is greater than your bank max capacity (regardless of actual naq-in-bank) then your realm goes into stasis (and the\us stops generating naquadah and units) and you remain in PPT. As soon as naq-on-hand is reduced below bank max capacity, the PPT expires and the stasis ends.
Of course there would have to be a maximum limit. Perhaps PPT stasis would automatically run out after five days, and leave you to the vultures.
This is intended to protect against a short term interruption - eg ISP going down, computer break down or virus infection, called away for family emergency, stuck in traffic, or merely overslept. It wont protect against a major calamity such as being admitted to hospital, but if that is the case then I think your SGW account is the least of your concerns.
I think, and I dont know if this is just me or not, but we need to drag this man out into the street, beat him with some billy clubs and then divy up whatever units and attack turns he has...
(\_/)
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny. Copy Bunny and this message into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination.
YEA BUNNY!!
(0.0)
(><)This is Bunny. Copy Bunny and this message into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination.
YEA BUNNY!!
