The Killing of Anti-covert
- Mr GoodKat
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:14 am
- ID: 0
- Location: England
- Contact:
The Killing of Anti-covert
The title says it all. You can destroy anything else, why not AC? Do like a new attack option or something. Dunno how it would be implemented, but i think it'd be a good idea?

- Mr GoodKat
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:14 am
- ID: 0
- Location: England
- Contact:
- Raven
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1580
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:35 am
- ID: 0
- Location: The Netherlands
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Zipacna wrote:It only dies when the target has no defense.
You sure? - I believe it dies when the target HAS defence.
How would you propose they should die? By normal attacks? If so, why? - because normal spies don't.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
unumosh
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 3:50 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Hello. Thank you for reading this. Bye.
-
BenjaminMS
- Tollan
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:20 am
- Alliance: ~Leaf Village~
- Race: Balancer
- ID: 1907529
- Alternate name(s): TUHD (Bioware forums)
- Location: Stuck between real life and the other end of a Stargate
That some ac are getting hurt by beams going around on the planet from the war?

Currently ingame known as BenMS
Goblin: "I like your boots."
Sorcerer: "That's because you don't have any. The emotion is called envy."
Spoiler
/smile at the green grass,
smile at the sun,
smile at the roses,
before they're gone/
BenjaminMS - 'A thief of roses'
smile at the sun,
smile at the roses,
before they're gone/
BenjaminMS - 'A thief of roses'
[TL] Renegadze zegt:
yeah definately makes more sense you hitting
and I have no DMU as you keep robbing it
MERC 1 zegt:
shuld not leave it out
any way you cant prove nothing
[TL] Michael/BenjaminMS zegt:
meh Rene, just find a few 0-def farms with 300+ tril DMU out...
MERC 1 zegt:
cool you two take it then i will hit you
-
Mujo
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:28 am
maybe covert agents could destroy anti-covert? when def is gone only tho, and as a new kind of attack perhaps?
or maybe normal attackers - but since anti-spies are sneaky, maybe spies would do better, or even anti-spies - ie anti-spies being able to kill enemy anti-spies in specialised attack type
only thing what im sure shouldnt happen, is another type of units "anti-antispies" since it would create kind of infinite loop
P.S. Wolfy, i couldve sworn there was another suggestion on this topic
or maybe normal attackers - but since anti-spies are sneaky, maybe spies would do better, or even anti-spies - ie anti-spies being able to kill enemy anti-spies in specialised attack type
only thing what im sure shouldnt happen, is another type of units "anti-antispies" since it would create kind of infinite loop
P.S. Wolfy, i couldve sworn there was another suggestion on this topic

- buck
- The Main Event
- Posts: 9809
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:56 am
- Race: Degenerate
- ID: 16843
- Location: Between and Devil and the Ace of spades
-
Honours and Awards
So what your saying is Ips custos Custodus or whatever it is..basically we should have an anti - anti - covert unit...
This could get very confuseing, they should just put anti covert into a seperate attack and anti-anti-covert come on as anouther attack..but then..would that go off your spy...or anouther spy level..3 lots of spy levels would get expensive....
This could get very confuseing, they should just put anti covert into a seperate attack and anti-anti-covert come on as anouther attack..but then..would that go off your spy...or anouther spy level..3 lots of spy levels would get expensive....


Spoiler


Poster of the Year
2007 -
Runner up signature of the Year
Runner up most improved player of the Year
Runner up hero of the Year
Alliance war of the year (CIA vs COP)
2008-
Hall of Fame
2009-
Runner up Hero of the Year
2010-
Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Tekki)
Runner up Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Darthudd)
Noteworthy alliances-
Omega
Mayhem
Radical Minority
Nemesis Sect
Warlords of Briton
Previous affiliations-
TL
Ricos
DDE
The Tok'ra
The OOC
The SLA
Missed and dear friends -
Too Many to count, but never forgotten.
Code:
-
Rukia
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:33 am
- ID: 0
- Location: in my Hokage office doing paperwork
- Jack_White
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:28 pm
- Alliance: N/A
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 6153
- Location: The land of the cheeseslicer!
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
hidden wrote:how about anti covert gets hurt when you get normal attacked
Like I said before you posted - why? Covert Agents don'r get killed in normal atatcks, so why should Anti-Covert?
I think that maybe Anti-Covert should kill Anti-Covert - not suire how to weave it in with what already occurs though.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
hidden
- Lord of Chickens
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:25 am
- ID: 0
- Location: in the chickens command centre
Wolf359 wrote:hidden wrote:how about anti covert gets hurt when you get normal attacked
Like I said before you posted - why? Covert Agents don'r get killed in normal atatcks, so why should Anti-Covert?
I think that maybe Anti-Covert should kill Anti-Covert - not suire how to weave it in with what already occurs though.
because anti covert units are not covert units
instead of losing anti when you attack im saying make it so anti dies when we get attacked
what is wrong with that?
Wolf359 wrote:I agree with hidden
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
hidden wrote:Wolf359 wrote:hidden wrote:how about anti covert gets hurt when you get normal attacked
Like I said before you posted - why? Covert Agents don'r get killed in normal atatcks, so why should Anti-Covert?
I think that maybe Anti-Covert should kill Anti-Covert - not suire how to weave it in with what already occurs though.
because anti covert units are not covert units
instead of losing anti when you attack im saying make it so anti dies when we get attacked
what is wrong with that?
I didn't say there was anything wrong with it, simply asked why it should be like that?
Covert units are not killed when you are attacked because they are not involved in defending an attack (unless AC are being used against them - in which case they are killed), so why should AC units be killed when you are attacked, because similarly they are not used to defend an attack.
Perhaps if they are to be killed when attacked, as I suggsted previously, they are killed by attacking AC. It sems that it is the ACs job to be assassins, therefore they sem the logical choice.
But one main point being missed is that people only tend to train up AC when they are intentionally going after someones spies - as soon as the job is done they are untrained again.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.






