Planet Thief

Locked
HellFire
Forum Regular
Posts: 600
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:10 pm
ID: 0

Planet Thief

Hate to be a pain in the butt, but I'm slightly miffed. I had a rather large planet taken from me, by an account named Red Angel. Or, http://www.stargatewars.com/stats.php?id=72177 Now. I actually don't mind, when someone steals one of my planets. I just go on my merry way, and steal 'em back. So, within 2 minutes (( I was online when it was stolen )) It was gone. Strange. I didn't think most people watched accounts, with 30k army size, for a planet, that is way out of its league.

~Miffed, HellFire.
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Forum Addict
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
ID: 0

that is why i work on planet defence right awwa...i suggest u work on it to...get around 10-15 billion def and there shouldnt be a problem then work on the benefits
Artiglio
Forum Regular
Posts: 618
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:59 pm
ID: 0
Location: Replicating

wheres the cheating here? :?
Image
gooseman the first
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 796
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:12 am
ID: 55105
Location: Dublin, working on a thing called 'humour'

yea, sounds like your average planet raider, they're really annoying but perfectly legal
HellFire
Forum Regular
Posts: 600
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:10 pm
ID: 0

Wait, creating a multi account, just to steal planets, is not against the rules?

~HellFire
Artiglio
Forum Regular
Posts: 618
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:59 pm
ID: 0
Location: Replicating

HellFire wrote:Wait, creating a multi account, just to steal planets, is not against the rules?

~HellFire


what? u didnt meantion anything about a multi... u only meantioned one account thats called Red Angel ... :?
Image
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Forum Addict
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
ID: 0

maybe he think red angel is a multi account of god knows who


dude when u lose a planet to a pirate...forget ever finding it again...there gone forever and the chnces of u finding it is will Zero to Zero
goomba

To all of you that cant fathom the header post, the inferrence is that the cheat is using a dummy account to take planets. He then uses a real account to take the planets from the dummy account. The benefit here is that the victim player will have no way of locating his former planet.
raistlin majere
Forum Elite
Posts: 1584
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:46 am
Alliance: Withheld
Race: Nanotimaster
ID: 8675309
Location: NorCal

goomba wrote:To all of you that cant fathom the header post, the inferrence is that the cheat is using a dummy account to take planets. He then uses a real account to take the planets from the dummy account. The benefit here is that the victim player will have no way of locating his former planet.


do you have proof of this happening?

and dont say "he took my planet and I looked and It was gone", that happens quite often nowadays, planet raiders get online with friends/customers and pass it off real quick.

and I believe you meant to use implication, not inference.
Psi Kiya Trist wrote:ZOMG IT"S RAI!!!
Image
Dr Phibes
Forum Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:40 am

I believe "inference" and "implication" work equally well in this instance.

Also, I think the amazingly small time frame of a couple of minutes strikes me as reasonably suspicious and worth investigating.

Even presuming it was a handoff between two actual players, I see every reason for the original poster to feel "scammed" under such a circumstance, "legal" i.e. not strictly against the rules and "ethical" i.e. in keeping with the spirit and ideas behind the rules are often 2 very different things; that's why rules get changed every so often.

The same thing happened to me recently; in my case, given the attacker was far far beneath me in ranking and has a remarkably high covert level and surprisingly low in defenses (0)for someone with a mothership , I'm very comfortable with the induction the account/player ("Destroyr of Worlds") is highly suspect at best.

Offhand dismissal is just as inadvisable as jumping to conclusions.
Dr Phibes
Forum Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:40 am

I guess I should say I rrreally don't take it as a given multis are the guaranteed explanation in either case, merely that both cases have enough suspicious circumstances so that the question of sames seems fair, obvious, and plausible.
Locked

Return to “For Admin Archives”