heres an idea going on what i said for a % of your total u,p dying
10 mil 1% dies
20 mil 2% dies
30 mil 3% dies and so on
all the way upto 50% even though noone that i could c getting to 50% any time in the next year or even the next year, that allows players still to get to 50 mil before even the big players can do that with their u,p plus they r able to raid upto the point of 75 mil
i say this because with my income i can buy if i was still able to almost 1 mil troops a day, not able to raid so thats another thing i cant do so thats left me with just u,p to do, and with the costs of that, it cost me about 2,5k a day i can do on that, so i do think the huge accounts as people c it r being slowly caught up anyway, so i dont c the need of putting a limit on it as some have worked really hard to get were they r and the troop counts, u will c that in all my logs to c how much time i have put into my account, if people want to chatch with the army size then spend more time on it attack as much as the other big account do, but putting a total limit on the army size because we have put more time in than others so they can chatch up is going to far. its true with everything in life and games, u worker harder than the rest u will b better
and for helping out allinace that your in or friends thats upto the player, i myself dont give out bils of naq a week i give out 10's of bils sometimes even 100's when i have it, by saying it will get more players to give each other naq is what i can c is not going to happen, its going to stay the same as players that do give out naq to friends or alliances r still going to b the same, on the other hand u will just have more players selling naq for cash because they cant spend it on u,p because there will b no point, y spend naq on something that u aint going to keep?
New Update - unit cap/plague
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
hidden wrote:Wolf359 wrote:hidden wrote:i cant honestly see why would would consider all the top players not been able to pass a level fun
that strategy to stay in the top rank isnt as fun as trying to get the most units you possibly can to stay in front
well then you are easily pleased
i disagree
what you call fun is probably the most boring things in the game
actually, it's more intellectually challenging than just building which is probably why I appreciate it more.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
hidden
- Lord of Chickens
- Posts: 7170
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:25 am
- ID: 0
- Location: in the chickens command centre
Wolf359 wrote:hidden wrote:Wolf359 wrote:hidden wrote:i cant honestly see why would would consider all the top players not been able to pass a level fun
that strategy to stay in the top rank isnt as fun as trying to get the most units you possibly can to stay in front
well then you are easily pleased
i disagree
what you call fun is probably the most boring things in the game
actually, it's more intellectually challenging than just building which is probably why I appreciate it more.
yes i see the challenge but thats not the point
i just dont see that as fun i see more fun in getting as many uu and stuff as i can
when many people are forced to stay at the same level it just gets boring obviously we disagree about it and neither of us will see it the other way
besides its challenging in the fact that how long do you work on trying to get uu because while doing that your losing ground to those who are working on stats
i find that more fun
Wolf359 wrote:I agree with hidden
- Forum
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:52 pm
-
Honours and Awards
i will say again -everything is changable.
some good ideas here, and i am continuing to read new posts that are thoughtful.
luckily, the limits are not reached yet (except for 'i am holding more than my own units' accounts) so there is time to consider
and i appreciate those that at least acknoledge the need for something to be done,and those who'se suggestions address this while offering alternatives.
admin j.
some good ideas here, and i am continuing to read new posts that are thoughtful.
luckily, the limits are not reached yet (except for 'i am holding more than my own units' accounts) so there is time to consider
and i appreciate those that at least acknoledge the need for something to be done,and those who'se suggestions address this while offering alternatives.
admin j.
-
Lore
- Fountain of Wisdom
- Posts: 10730
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:30 am
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium Empire
- Race: System Lord / AJNA
- ID: 1928117
- Location: On the dark side of the moon
-
Honours and Awards
- TheRook
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:54 am
- Alliance: Warlords of Briton
- Race: Humanoid
- ID: 30679
- Location: Down t' naquadah mines
I quite like the idea
I think it means as forum/wolf said that people will be on the limit but will then have to manage their Units/army better which
is what I personally like doing
I think that if I had a 22million army size (I only have 2.2mill now (a small fry
)) I would be able to have 1 mill dudes in each off/def/covert and that would make me damn hardcore...
probably would only be rank 20 or so but still its an awesome feat
but I'm just a delusional "noobie" only been playing since late january
anyway I like some of teh suggestions I've read like he % of lifers/miners dying once it reaches a certain amount and also the idea of each ascension gives you a % on top of your max army size (plague /raiding cap)
anyhow
Good Stuff
TheRook
Warlord of Briton
is what I personally like doing
I think that if I had a 22million army size (I only have 2.2mill now (a small fry
probably would only be rank 20 or so but still its an awesome feat
but I'm just a delusional "noobie" only been playing since late january
anyway I like some of teh suggestions I've read like he % of lifers/miners dying once it reaches a certain amount and also the idea of each ascension gives you a % on top of your max army size (plague /raiding cap)
anyhow
Good Stuff
TheRook
Warlord of Briton
My Account for Sale (cold hard cash) at the link below (Have a look its a great deal!)
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 1&t=174111
Main ID = 30679 | Ascended ID = 1467
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 1&t=174111
Main ID = 30679 | Ascended ID = 1467
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
hidden wrote:when many people are forced to stay at the same level it just gets boring obviously we disagree about it and neither of us will see it the other way
it hasn't happened yet.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
- Grand Admiral Martin
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:46 pm
- Alliance: I serve only myself.
- Race: Ascended Irish
- ID: 33984
- Location: Unknown
alliance wars will just be about numbers, if we are all the same then those with more members will have more power simply as that, strategy wont really ever play a part in this game, not without really changing it. if everyone has 10mil uu in defnce the an alliance with 10 members will simply beat one with 5

- TheRook
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:54 am
- Alliance: Warlords of Briton
- Race: Humanoid
- ID: 30679
- Location: Down t' naquadah mines
Emperor Martin wrote:alliance wars will just be about numbers, if we are all the same then those with more members will have more power simply as that, strategy wont really ever play a part in this game, not without really changing it. if everyone has 10mil uu in defnce the an alliance with 10 members will simply beat one with 5
an alliance with 10 members can be beaten by an alliance of 5... its all about who gets the first drop... alliance of 5 takes out the others over night... alliance war has been won... simple as that...
My Account for Sale (cold hard cash) at the link below (Have a look its a great deal!)
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 1&t=174111
Main ID = 30679 | Ascended ID = 1467
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 1&t=174111
Main ID = 30679 | Ascended ID = 1467
- Grand Admiral Martin
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:46 pm
- Alliance: I serve only myself.
- Race: Ascended Irish
- ID: 33984
- Location: Unknown
TheRook wrote:Emperor Martin wrote:alliance wars will just be about numbers, if we are all the same then those with more members will have more power simply as that, strategy wont really ever play a part in this game, not without really changing it. if everyone has 10mil uu in defnce the an alliance with 10 members will simply beat one with 5
an alliance with 10 members can be beaten by an alliance of 5... its all about who gets the first drop... alliance of 5 takes out the others over night... alliance war has been won... simple as that...
i know but if both are on , anyway why is this being argued about now even at 1mil uu a week youd be over a year away from reaching mx limit, we could all be dead by then! or worse the server crashed permanently lol

-
Midnight
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 10:35 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Hell and high water...
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Emperor Martin wrote:alliance wars will just be about numbers, if we are all the same then those with more members will have more power simply as that, strategy wont really ever play a part in this game, not without really changing it. if everyone has 10mil uu in defnce the an alliance with 10 members will simply beat one with 5
that is a somewhat naive take on it - in the past alliances have beaten more powerful alliances through being better organised - so to say strategy will never really be a part of the game is grossly inaccurate - because it already has.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
- Profitteroles
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:34 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: England
Emperor Martin wrote:alliance wars will just be about numbers, if we are all the same then those with more members will have more power simply as that, strategy wont really ever play a part in this game, not without really changing it. if everyone has 10mil uu in defnce the an alliance with 10 members will simply beat one with 5
I watched a player with an army size of 4 mill take on and beat a player with a 30 mill army size in a one on one war through nothing but his intelligence, game strategy and will to win.
-
EVIL_THOR_6_6_6
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:27 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: UK
what no1 has mentioned is the option of lifers or the men that die to be converted into APP's this would countermeasure the balence of army size in main but also it could add to the points or income or AT's in ascension (call it a roulett).
this way you would still have no control over what you receive in ascended realm.
just an idea but it would balance out some issues here
this way you would still have no control over what you receive in ascended realm.
just an idea but it would balance out some issues here
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards




