rejected brokers - stop uu being returned as Untrained

Locked
CJayC
Forum Newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:44 am
ID: 0
Location: The Greatest Country On Earth, The UK, Disagree?? Your Wrong!
Contact:

rejected brokers - stop uu being returned as Untrained

i read a thread awhile back about some guy rejected a broker for uu so the uu went back to the guy who initiated the trade, sat in the open while the fella who rejected the broker "apparently" got a friend to raid him

i propose that if uu brokers are rejected they shouldnt go back as untrained where their vulnerable to raiders, you could argue that the player should be online to train the uu, but if the trade is rejected it really is beyond the players control.

maybe the uu should stay with the "broker" if rejected then the player has the option to confirm the rejection

or the uu go back to the players realm as miners

any thoughts?

sorry for any grammitical or spelling errors, im tired
id=34945
Image
Image
Timmy
Forum Irregular
Posts: 275
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:23 pm

no it should stay as it is cause it puts a risk to trading
Rukia
Forum Elite
Posts: 1646
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:33 am
ID: 0
Location: in my Hokage office doing paperwork

there is a point where it stops becoming a risk and becomes scamming. rejecting a trade just to raid them should be illegal...
Rukia previously known as Shizune

Sode no Shirayuki! Hakuren!

"Those who abandon their friends are worse than trash" - Uchiha Obito

*does Kuroigakure no justu and vanishes*

Image
Dannis
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:40 am
ID: 0
Location: Australia

I'm going to have to say no, but rejecting the trade then stealing it is pretty much scamming. You gain sombodys trust, trade with them, then they take what they can.

Maybe some names of offenders could slide under the table ;)
Image



Forum Replicating pieman
Tok`ra

Lanklock wrote:I'm going to have to say no, but rejecting the trade then stealing it is pretty much scamming. You gain sombodys trust, trade with them, then they take what they can.

Maybe some names of offenders could slide under the table ;)



Agreed, said persons need massing.


That said..... anything from the broker should be held in some type of protection for 2 days or something if sent back.
User avatar
GeneralChaos
Forum Addict
Posts: 3421
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:56 pm
Alliance: Omega
ID: 59627

I like Tok'ra's idea there, if someone rejects a trade, is should send you a message saying its been rejected, and then you go to the trade broker and accept the rejected trade back, so you can train the UU, just a 24 hour limit after that they auto go back into UU.
CJayC
Forum Newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:44 am
ID: 0
Location: The Greatest Country On Earth, The UK, Disagree?? Your Wrong!
Contact:

yea, i think tok'ra said it better than me but that was pretty much my idea
id=34945
Image
Image
raistlin majere
Forum Elite
Posts: 1584
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:46 am
Alliance: Withheld
Race: Nanotimaster
ID: 8675309
Location: NorCal

I actually agree on that point, one of the very few things(if not only) I have seen from Tok'ra that wasnt trash or spam and it is not only relevent, but somewhat decent.
Psi Kiya Trist wrote:ZOMG IT"S RAI!!!
Image
Tok`ra

Raistlin Majere wrote:I actually agree on that point, one of the very few things(if not only) I have seen from Tok'ra that wasnt trash or spam and it is not only relevent, but somewhat decent.


People tend to see what they want, not what is actualy there.
GAT-X207
Forum Expert
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:55 am
ID: 0
Location: P4C-970, Aschen Homeworld

good idea about confirming rejection, uu staying in broker max 1 dy before droping bak to uu without confirmation good.

uu automatically retrained as miners/spies etc upon rejection confirmation-bad (just farm some naq to retrain)
Image
who needs submarines anyway, those little black boats just keep sinking under the water anyway.
User avatar
Anarchy_
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 789
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:41 pm
Alliance: Δ Allegiance
Race: NanoTiMaster
ID: 52622
Location: Australia

[quote=CJayC] i propose that if uu brokers are rejected they shouldnt go back as untrained where their vulnerable to raiders, you could argue that the player should be online to train the uu, but if the trade is rejected it really is beyond the players control. [/quote]

if they got autoamtically retrained into miners or spies then people could abuse it with huge numbers of uu just to save the money it would cost them to train them normally.
i like the idea of them being held in a kind of "storage" for 24 hrs max or b4 if the player comes on and accepts them back, itd help stop scamm trades that end up in the uu being raided
Image
Image
Trade Feedback Thread
ID: 52622
Image
Replicator/NanoTiMaster Mod colour
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”