Raiding question

[Afentius]

This is something I've never seen...

I'm a rep, and I have about 50k super attackers trained already, but I'm raiding, so I only have 1 wep. When this 1 wep is the weakest wep, about 100supers die to the opponent's 0 defence, but when this 1 wep is the most powerful wep, none die. Why?


Thanks

edit - another question, sorry if its been answered before, I think it has... but do fleets add to your rank? Can someone give me a link to all that fleets do, because I have no clue what they do, ect..

[Grand Admiral Martin]

fleets add power to mothership which would mean your mothership rank would go up

[Reeb]

The # who dies depends on your strike action compared to the person you are attacking. Since the majority of raid targets are 0 defense, even 1 weapon HIGHLY outdoes their defense action. Therefore, you lose nothing.

[Afentius]

but if that one wep is the weakest wep possable, you DO lose supers...

EDIT - after some expermintation, if you go below... 6000 power left on any wep (When you attack, and see how much damage you do, if its below around 6000...) you'll start to lose supers (I have 40k)

if you have the weakest wep, I was losing 100 supers.. I've never noticed it before, I encourage raiders to try this...


for pure rank, which is better, MS weps or fleets? Or both? thanks

[Munchy]

for pure rank, which is better, MS weps or fleets? Or both? thanks

If you want a better rank, weapons and shields are far cheaper to raise power wise than fleets are.

[Afentius]

well, munchy, when does the cost of the "room for the weps" go over the cheapness of the fleet weps (when you... say have 800 room for fleet weps)

if you know what I mean...

[#?#]

for pure rank, which is better, MS weps or fleets? Or both? thanks

If you want a better rank, weapons and shields are far cheaper to raise power wise than fleets are.

I wouldn't rely much on fleets as a stat increaser...

[Rukia]

fleets get damaged after every battle too...