HIGHER TURNS CAPACITY WITH ASCENTIONS

~SPARTAN~
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:36 pm
ID: 0
Contact:

HIGHER TURNS CAPACITY WITH ASCENTIONS

Every time you ascend, maybe add more turns to the maximum capacity. Maybe a 20% max turns increase with each ascention? or something similar.
gooseman the first
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 796
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:12 am
ID: 55105
Location: Dublin, working on a thing called 'humour'

naaa, sure what about the people who dont want to ascend?
if you need more turn storage, just ask a friend
~SPARTAN~
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:36 pm
ID: 0
Contact:

It would be just another bonus of ascending like the 5 % bonuses to all your stats. If you dont' wanna ascend, you would miss out on this turn storage bonus along with the rest of them.
GAT-X207
Forum Expert
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:55 am
ID: 0
Location: P4C-970, Aschen Homeworld

might work but not 20%, 5,5,5,5,5,5,1..... sounds better
or just a total 20% rise regardles of how many thimes u ascend
Image
who needs submarines anyway, those little black boats just keep sinking under the water anyway.
~SPARTAN~
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:36 pm
ID: 0
Contact:

maybe 10% of the original each time? so, you gain an extra 1 k capacity every time you ascend
GAT-X207
Forum Expert
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:55 am
ID: 0
Location: P4C-970, Aschen Homeworld

to store a extra 6k is too much 20-25 is a bit more fair. dont want ascended accounts to get too many advantages
Image
who needs submarines anyway, those little black boats just keep sinking under the water anyway.
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

Why exactly?

Seriously people - try some game management rather than just wanting to have unlimited space to horde everything.
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
User avatar
Juliette
Verified
The Queen
Posts: 31802
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
Race: Royalty
ID: 4323
Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
Location: Ultima Thule

I'm with the Wolfman here. :-D
Image
Asclepius
Forum Newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:24 am
ID: 0
Location: UK

It sounds a nice idea, but wouldn't it just mean yet more power to the powerful again?
The Lord hath created medicines out of the earth; and he that is wise will not abhor them. ~Ecclesiasticus 38:4
Image
User avatar
Lord Morlock
Forum Regular
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:52 pm
Alliance: The Dark Dominium
Race: System Lord
ID: 29392
Location: Dunnville, Ontario, Canada

Asclepius wrote:It sounds a nice idea, but wouldn't it just mean yet more power to the powerful again?


Every update means that..That doesn't make it bad...

Still, I'd say this isn't something worth bothering with, whether it's a good idea or not...
Image
Image
Get Free Naq Here
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

bad idea, there is no need to hold more than 10k turns... just buy more when you get close to zero again...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
~SPARTAN~
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:36 pm
ID: 0
Contact:

Asclepius wrote:It sounds a nice idea, but wouldn't it just mean yet more power to the powerful again?


Yes possibly, But alot of the not so powerful (such as myself) make there naq by raiding and selling, and only being able to hold 10 k at a time restrains the amount of raiding i can do. Because when you use ur mt's n fill up your supply. Once you run out, there isn't alway someone to buy from right away, and you miight lose a day or so of raiding.
JOS
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:25 pm
Alliance: Valhalla
Race: NanoTiMaster
ID: 86242
Location: Australia
Contact:

Having this would unbalance things even more. It'd mean that the already powerful could increase the gap between them and the rest of the game hugely. It'd put lower players at a major disadvantage. I say no to this one.
Image

Image
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.

16:14 Thomas Lasky Attack defended 15 34,665,589 0 xxx xxx
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Forum Addict
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
ID: 0

now how about u make ideas that helsp everyone not just ascneded ppl
Pelops

I think it is a great idea! 5% max increase each ascension. And should acended players get a bonus and unfair advantage? Um YES, and for those that choose not to ascend, it would just be one more reason to ascend, you dont think the other 5% increases are worth the work, then dont ascend for this 5%.
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”