Conquer planet -> Liberate planet

So, what's the best approach to the planet problems?

Remove planets alltogether
4
15%
Increase the cost of stealing, but keep the conquer option
2
7%
Force thieves to keep something that can be destroyed
8
30%
Liberation, with an increased cost to massing a planet
1
4%
Liberation alone should do it
6
22%
None of the above
6
22%
 
Total votes: 27
Sleipnir
Merriest Mod in the West
Posts: 2340
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:16 pm
ID: 0
Location: Off-world

Honours and Awards

Conquer planet -> Liberate planet

I've already mentioned this idea in a few other threads on planet thieving problems. But I think this idea is different enough in approach to warrant its own thread and I want to run a poll to hear what people think of it.

My idea is a very simple approach to the entire planet stealing problem. Just make it so that planets can no longer be stolen. Instead, the conquer planet attack is replaced with a liberate planet attack. If successful, this will take the planet away from the owner, and add it to the galactic reserves again, where another mothership may pick it up during a regular exploration mission.

So, what does this accomplish?

    People that claim their planets are "protected" will find this protection means very little when the planet is gone with no way to retrieve it.

    People that set up multies to steal planets and then hide them through a couple of swift transfers will find their cheating tactic has become useless.

    No more selling other people's planets. You can't sell what you can't obtain.

    Planets will regularly be returned to the galaxy for others to pick up. Giving everyone the chance to have one for at least a while. Big players will likely be able to hold on to them longer, but not forever.

    Big players will gain a vulnerable spot. Even if you can't mass their account, you can at least remove a planet. There's nothing they can do but retaliate. They won't be able to get it back. This opens up a new liberator type player as a tactical component of alliance strike teams.

    Hopefully the tension about stolen planets will alleviate. Fewer massings because of stolen planets. It won't bring the planet back anyway so revenge is the only motive.

    Downside, no one will be able to steal planets anymore so the good guys lose an option due to the bad guys' abuse of it.


At the same time there may have to be an update to make liberating a planet slightly more expensive, more towards the cost for upgrading them. There's plenty of suggestions on that already so I'll leave that part to the other threads.
Image

As soon as you build an idiot proof system, somebody else builds a better idiot.

If it moves, kill it. If it doesn't move, kick it until it does move, and then kill it.
wizard

Re: Conquer planet -> Liberate planet

I got a simple answer to this:

SHAITAN EDIT: REPEAT AFTER ME: I won't make a nuisance of myself on these forums, or I'll get my ass kicked!
Sleipnir
Merriest Mod in the West
Posts: 2340
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:16 pm
ID: 0
Location: Off-world

Honours and Awards

When critisizing someone's suggestion, it's usually a good idea to come up with a more compelling argument than your CAPSLOCK button. Also, spamming threads is not encouraged. I've seen this post of yours multiple times.

If a large part of the players is whining, it's usually because there's something wrong with the game. If you remember the first time raid was introduced, you'll know that it was swiftly removed after a lot of "whining", in other words, valid complaints.

I have lost one planet to a planet thief shortly after they were introduced, and haven't felt the need to get another since then. I couldn't care less if planets were removed completely. But there appear to be a lot of people around with valid complaints about the system, who don't want to see them go either. For those people I have put up this alternate suggestion. If you don't want to read it, move on to something that interests you.
Image

As soon as you build an idiot proof system, somebody else builds a better idiot.

If it moves, kill it. If it doesn't move, kick it until it does move, and then kill it.
User avatar
TacticalCommander
Forum Regular
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:51 am
Race: Saige
ID: 8742
Location: somewhere.....elsewhere....anywhere

Maybe this could be an option for those who have 10 planets already. I haven't tried attacking with 10 planets, but I don't think you can attack planets if you have 10. *Correct me if I am wrong.

So this option could come in handy if someone with 10 planets want to make his enemy lose planets without having to take them himself or abandon one of his own.

Thats my 2 cents
TC
GLORY TO THE GOD ALMIGHTY!
I am not being aggressive, I am being dominant.
Image
Image
Kaska
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:25 am
Alliance: [ HervardI Training ]
Race: Ancient
ID: 73626
Location: Slovenija
Contact:

like this one :D

but do the planet losses all its def, like when you conquer, or not

and a new button would be good
Image
My IQ is 137 - Free-IQTest.net - Free IQ Tests
_BlackAsc_
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:40 pm

i dont mind the idea of liberation as then the only time planets are lost is when someone is being a ba#$@* rather than everyone looking at your planet for profit gives a lesser chance of newbies lossing them until they piss somone off too although the higher rankings will be going through planets like hotcakes when war is amongst them
User avatar
Spacey
Forum Zombie
Posts: 7426
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:00 pm
ID: 0
Location: five steps behind where I need to be

Sleipnir wrote:...it's usually a good idea to come up with a more compelling argument than your CAPSLOCK button....
I agree. I will be approaching a mod, not Sleip so he's not accused of bias, with a request to delete the post, as I don't think it contributes anything to the thread(offers not positive or negative points), and is calling people names.

I have a question. Why would someone want to liberate a planet? They would lose out with turns, and they gain nothing.
Image
"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers.
For those who shed their blood with me today
will always be my brother."
Image
Image
Kaska
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:25 am
Alliance: [ HervardI Training ]
Race: Ancient
ID: 73626
Location: Slovenija
Contact:

its good for massing someones stats :D
if you have 10 planes allready, you cant stole any more, but if this come in, you can libarate it form someone
Image
My IQ is 137 - Free-IQTest.net - Free IQ Tests
Chris M
Forum Expert
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:06 pm
Race: System Lord
ID: 13122
Location: England

but ppl dont always keep planets they steal from enemies so i actually see this as a good idea!
RETIRED
wizard

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, who edited my post?, this is what i was meant to say before it got edited" STOP WHINING".
wizard

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, who edited my post?, this is what i was meant to say before it got edited" STOP WHINING".



quoted , hehe
User avatar
Dagr
Forum Expert
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:24 pm
Race: Asgard
ID: 50627
Alternate name(s): Day
Location: U.S.A.

mayb there should b a chance(%) that when u try 2 steal a planet it will b liberated
Danakor
Forum Newbie
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:27 pm

I do like the idea of liberating to a point. Just to force us to liberate a planet rather then steal it is unfair. basicly it makes us who want a planet and who are able tot ake it after 1 try not be able to get it.

I do like the % chance of liberating. I.E. the planet's citizens get tired of being under attack yadda yadda and rise up against the gods. then after X amount of time the planet goes into the mothership bucket again.

Also it should be made so that if you have 10 planets you do have the ability to automatically liberate a planet(in case someone threatens to steal one of your planets or just annoys you.).

I do also like the idea of raising prices to mass a planet IE fleets take more damage from a successful defend. Instead of only damaging fleets from a successful defend why not destroy 10% of the attackers fleets.

just my $0.02 worth.
Sleipnir
Merriest Mod in the West
Posts: 2340
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:16 pm
ID: 0
Location: Off-world

Honours and Awards

Spacey wrote:
Sleipnir wrote:...it's usually a good idea to come up with a more compelling argument than your CAPSLOCK button....
I agree. I will be approaching a mod, not Sleip so he's not accused of bias, with a request to delete the post, as I don't think it contributes anything to the thread(offers not positive or negative points), and is calling people names.

I have a question. Why would someone want to liberate a planet? They would lose out with turns, and they gain nothing.



Same reason someone would waste turns on massing a defense.
Image

As soon as you build an idiot proof system, somebody else builds a better idiot.

If it moves, kill it. If it doesn't move, kick it until it does move, and then kill it.
Inferno™
Suspended
Posts: 492
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:27 am
ID: 0

I dont like this at all. Planet thiefs can be annoying but the current system works, least when they take it i got a chance to get my planet bk, this is just stupid though.
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”