Mr. Ed Raid 13 Undeveloped Planets lost
4,497 Labour lost 15 1533 126 52,835,131,792 58,538,302,344
O.K. Until I was raided by Mr Ed ( changed name on log) I thought it was uneconomical to raid me. I sent a message to raider to ask why he had wasted over 7,000 Planets( on basis of these attack planets being interlinked) to get 4510 planets. As I had though logs were accurate reflection of losses.
I now find to my horror that the attackers losses are already in terms of total planets ie 1533 rather than interlinked losses ( 1533x5). whereas my losses were already calculated in terms of interlinked ie 126x5. It seems ridicolous to me that the defence and attack planet losses are not of the same order if they are both same type
As a result I have had to redouble my defences.
I felt like such a Noob when Mr Ed pointed this out
P.S Assassin logs are the wrong way round as well
Melchet the Greats Shadow planet fleets on mission: 200000
Your assult strength on the enemy Intelligence planets and fleets: 606984570
Enemy estimated Shadow defensive strength: 571328422
After crushing through their Shadow defences, estimated strength left for military planet and fleet eradication: 35,656,148
Enemy Conqueror planets eliminated: 0
Enemy Interlinked Conqueror planets eliminated: 3
Enemy Defender planets eliminated: 0
Enemy Interlinked Defender planets eliminated: 5648
Own Shadow planet decimated to worthless rock and destroyed by the enemy Shadow planet fleets during the mission: 8000
It was not enemies interlinked defenders destroyed it was mine!!!
