Relm Submistion

Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

perhaps have a checkbox on preferences with "dont want to ascend again", amd then one gains no glory, and one more lower player gains G&R... and that box is always marked for those with 10 ascensions...

GAT-X207 wrote:zeratul, your idea is OK except one thing, becoming unranked. many ppl farm the inactives as do i. the time limits can work to put into effect larger returns from atking them (although not too high a %)


how many players with less than 100k army do you regularly attack?

and although this might remove a few raid farms, it shouldnt be much problem, as the better ones have some other units, and new ones appear every day...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
GAT-X207
Forum Expert
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:55 am
ID: 0
Location: P4C-970, Aschen Homeworld

got me there :( less than 100k, not many that i atk
Image
who needs submarines anyway, those little black boats just keep sinking under the water anyway.
Lore
Fountain of Wisdom
Posts: 10730
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:30 am
Alliance: The Dark Dominium Empire
Race: System Lord / AJNA
ID: 1928117
Location: On the dark side of the moon

Honours and Awards

Zeratul wrote:perhaps have a checkbox on preferences with "dont want to ascend again", amd then one gains no glory, and one more lower player gains G&R... and that box is always marked for those with 10 ascensions...

GAT-X207 wrote:zeratul, your idea is OK except one thing, becoming unranked. many ppl farm the inactives as do i. the time limits can work to put into effect larger returns from atking them (although not too high a %)


how many players with less than 100k army do you regularly attack?

and although this might remove a few raid farms, it shouldnt be much problem, as the better ones have some other units, and new ones appear every day...


The check box may not be a good idea. The limit may change and the person may want to ascend then. I get G&R solely to increase my APP. I got plenty but when I do ascend again I want it to be the best and most powerful as possible.
Image
schuesseled wrote:And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.
undead21
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:03 pm
ID: 0

uhh back to the topic at hand...
ImageImageImage
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

Lore wrote:The check box may not be a good idea. The limit may change and the person may want to ascend then. I get G&R solely to increase my APP. I got plenty but when I do ascend again I want it to be the best and most powerful as possible.


what limit? the 10 ascensions limit? if that were to happen, the players at 10 ascensions would of course be able to uncheck the box... and there is that APP thing... this was only meant for those never wishing to ascend again...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
Thelen
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:21 pm
ID: 0
Location: Aussie LOL
Contact:

To make it really interesting, you could have a bunch of factors determing whether an account is removed. eg:
1. less than 20k army size
2. not logged in for 2 weeks (out of VM)
3. not logged in for 1 month (in VM)
4. has not been in top 20k in past 2 months
5.. other factors..

If more than 2 of these factors are answered YES, then the account is deleted. Yes, so this in theory could mean accounts with 100 mil men, but haven't logged in for 2 weeks and are not in top 20k COULD BE DELETED.

This would also weed out those players who aren't serious about playing. Sure, it might be a bit harsh to just delete, but it will mean people actually have to play, and not just fart around and not do anything..

On this note, you could then have a 2nd server, where all these accounts are 'sent'. That way they could still have it, but the 2nd server would be alot slower, etc.
undead21
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:03 pm
ID: 0

thelen wrote:To make it really interesting, you could have a bunch of factors determing whether an account is removed. eg:
1. less than 20k army size
2. not logged in for 2 weeks (out of VM)
3. not logged in for 1 month (in VM)
4. has not been in top 20k in past 2 months
5.. other factors..

If more than 2 of these factors are answered YES, then the account is deleted. Yes, so this in theory could mean accounts with 100 mil men, but haven't logged in for 2 weeks and are not in top 20k COULD BE DELETED.

This would also weed out those players who aren't serious about playing. Sure, it might be a bit harsh to just delete, but it will mean people actually have to play, and not just fart around and not do anything..

On this note, you could then have a 2nd server, where all these accounts are 'sent'. That way they could still have it, but the 2nd server would be alot slower, etc.


your plan is too much like a Main server re-set... not gouna happen.

but factors in relm submistion would be intersting...

and a reminder this is not about deleeting accounts its about making them submit to the active players.
ImageImageImage
curiousmanners
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:30 pm
ID: 0

I don't feel that submission to active players is a good idea... that would severly discourage players from coming back from the hiatus' we take in the game...
Last remaining warrior of the APMT
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

no, it shouldnt do that, as all forms of "submission" end the turn change after one logs in again...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
undead21
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:03 pm
ID: 0

no its only when they are in-active, its becuse the relm leader has been away for weeks, months, years.... when the player logs back in its reset to 0.... so the longer your away from your account the easyer it becomes to raid and farm. (raid mostly). when they come back the counters are reset to their zero or neutral status.

baiscly it dose not discourage re-entry to the game.
ImageImageImage
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”