I'm planning to spend a long time (i.e many months) building both U.P and army size. However, should I pour all my naq into U.P and raid for more uu? Or use naq for AT, and raid for MUCH more uu (but have a lower U.P)?
I'm planning to amass enough resources to do all 6 ascentions in 1 month towards the end of the year, but I'm kinda stuck as to how exactly to concentrate my resources. Big U.P = lower army size vs low U.P (U.P gives diminishing returns as it rises, AT, while also rising in cost, is much more static in value) .
Assuming my C.O also increases his income, and I also increase mine(assuming the majority of my army size is miners), what's the best scenario?
1. Low level U.P. More focus on raiding.
2. Mid level U.P. Some focus on raiding.
3. High level U.P. Least focus on raiding.
I'm leaning towards option 3, raiding 2k AT a day(which I find very easy to do). I'm an effective raider, so, raiding isn't a problem. Obviously option 3 also uses the least amount of time.
I'm interested to hear your opinions, preferably from all ends of the spectrum (high/low U.P and army sizes). I'd also appreciate input on the use of PPT to aid this goal. Worth it or not? I obviously have full SS and I use the black market frequently.
Note: I don't have any planets, nor do I plan to rely on any. They are a waste of naq IMO, unless you have LOTS to spare, which I don't
Note2: I'm only maintaining a def and covert. I'm an Asgard, so it's not massively expensive to maintain a def. I also have no mothership atm.
Note3: I'm starting afresh with a new account. I'm currently sitting with nearly a 10k U.P and 200k army size after 4 days (thanks to a healthy naq boost from a friend
).
