Star Trek VS Star Wars (and anything inbetween.)

[Apadizamek]

Thats correct, Star wars VS Star Trek.

who do you think would win?

[The Hamburglar]

picard vrs jabba

data and the enterprise computer vrs r2d2 and c3p0

leia vrs seven of nine... mud wrestling style!

yep, i likes i likes...

[Mordack]

I think Star Wars would win.

"We gotta Death Star."

[GrandadmiralThrawn]

see for yourselves,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxhrPaaCA4

[Grand Admiral Martin]

Forget Star Wars the Empire alone wins that.

[Windblade]

see for yourselves,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxhrPaaCA4

damm thats some funny stuff never seen that one before

[Saturnine]

Im going to vote Star Wars.

I was into Star Trek when I was younger, but I've recovered.

The problem I have with Star Trek are its time line fallancies.

I felt like walking up to Vanilla Ice in 1992 and saying: "Dude, forget you. I'd rather have the Eugenics wars and Kahn. Its Roddenberries world, we just live in it."

Its hard to watch a sci fi epic written before the nineties, that has this glorious future planned out for us.. You've seen it before:

THE YEAR IS 1999

or

THE YEAR IS 2000

then cue all of the flying cars and space ships to other planets that we didnt get for christmas in 98.

I cant watch something with such a fallancy, call me particular but I just find it tough.

STAR WARS BABY!!!

think about it. Its political, its spiritual, its horror, its comedy, its sci fi, its a thriller. Its something for everyone. I wish more peeps would give it a chance instead of labeling it nerdish. They must be confusing us with Star Trek fans. But think about it for a minute...

If you were a closet nerd, would you rather have your girl friend find your Star Wars figures, or your Star Trek figures?

[Apadizamek]

you must hate transformers too they said that the wars were during 1996, you must also hate nearly all of the science fiction of the 1950's because of its timeline issues.

Anyhoo i would vote star trek and i'll explain when i have more time.

[*~Starry~*]

I like star wars before anakin turned evil...
<<
>>

like the obi-wan as a padawan series etc...>_<
{okay, so I never watched the show, just read the books...but htat counts}

but I like enterprise from star trek... cause archer is the bestest!


~starry~*

[GrandadmiralThrawn]

I would vote star wars as it's great, but star trek did have some great stuff, like Seven of nine on voyager, or t'pol and hoshi and enterprise.
Archer wasn't bad but i prefered him in Quantom leap

the star wars books set after return were good hence where i got the name Thrawn from.
both good but star wars better.

Hallowed is the starry

[Fear Of The Duck]

Star Wars of course! Rogue squadron in particular (see, Star Trek doesn't consider a small one-man fighter to be any threat. Star Trek ships defenses are designed around a direct large-ship scale assault. A small one-man fighter is able to penetrate the defense. And then one well placed proton torpedo starts a chain reaction which destroys a Star Trek ship).

[Psi Kiya Trist]

Star Wars of course! Rogue squadron in particular (see, Star Trek doesn't consider a small one-man fighter to be any threat. Star Trek ships defenses are designed around a direct large-ship scale assault. A small one-man fighter is able to penetrate the defense. And then one well placed proton torpedo starts a chain reaction which destroys a Star Trek ship).

untrue... Star Trek has "fighters" i can link you to a site that gives technical details of them.


also, you're not considering two factors.
factor 1) differant universe power generation.
in star trek they have singularity systems which according to their math, generate less power than the star wars hypothetical systems of the same design and function.
factor 2) relative technologies.
star trek has transphasic torpedoes, and temporal ships. also, most ships of the line can be equiped with cloaking devices, which increases their tactical advantages.
also, ever wonder what would happen if the federation used their tractor beams on asteroids and catapulted them at warp speed towards an enemy fleet/planet?
star wars has the death star, relatively slow moving, and hard to aim at ships.(especially maneuverable ones like in star trek.)

also, the land war would be interesting. we've seen relatively nothing of star trek land wars. most we've seen is squads of "security" with rifles.
in star wars, we've seen massive land battles with huge fighting machines.
so, i'm in favor of star wars for land wars.

too many factors for it to be sure either way in space, but i'm somewhat in favor of star trek simply due to their overall strategic options.


~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~

[Bad Wolf]

I think Star Wars would win.

"We gotta Death Star."

Obi-Wan: That's no moon. It's a space station.


Star Wars hands down, it would just destory it.

BW

[Fear Of The Duck]

Star Trek doesn't have the Jedi (and the Rogue Squadron of course)

We can mind-trick Picard as we wish.

[Bad Wolf]

We can mind-trick Picard as we wish.

Im pretty sure anyone can.... lol

BW