Why isn't this an annoucnement? Come on. Nobody reads announcements and stickies - EVERYONE knows that!.
Agapooka
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Agapooka wrote:Why isn't this an annoucnement? Come on. Nobody reads announcements and stickies - EVERYONE knows that!.![]()
![]()
Agapooka





Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Agapooka wrote:Now that I have your attention with the hug, cap locks and typo,

Mathlord wrote:The Reclaimer has been descended as a result of the battle!!!
Good times
update well it's more or restating it in better english, atleast better canadian english!

Agapooka wrote:Now that I have your attention with the hug, cap locks and typo, I'd like to mention that everyone ought to re-read the rules, as they've been revised. They are, for the most part, the same, but have notable changes.
Why isn't this an annoucnement? Come on. Nobody reads announcements and stickies - EVERYONE knows that!.![]()
![]()
Agapooka




Mathlord wrote:The Reclaimer has been descended as a result of the battle!!!
Good times