Sleipnir wrote:Ah, but who will hug the huggers?
The same people who mod the mods...
Sleipnir wrote:Ah, but who will hug the huggers?
Pimping D wrote:if this game has made you cry please delete your account and get a life
The Phoenix Awards!Prophet of Truth wrote:You are an impediment that the universe can no longer abide. Nature itself cries out for your destruction...
Tollan Phoenix wrote:Sleipnir wrote:Ah, but who will hug the huggers?
The same people who mod the mods...
Rienna wrote:I will hug the huggers! *hugs all of the huggers, and Jason himself*
woot! new rules! *hugs the new rules too*
Though, honestly Jason, rule 4 should be in more than one thread, not more than one forum.......
*hugs the rules, Jason, and the huggers regardless*
Pimping D wrote:if this game has made you cry please delete your account and get a life
The Phoenix Awards!Prophet of Truth wrote:You are an impediment that the universe can no longer abide. Nature itself cries out for your destruction...

Mathlord wrote:The Reclaimer has been descended as a result of the battle!!!
Good times
Pimping D wrote:if this game has made you cry please delete your account and get a life
The Phoenix Awards!Prophet of Truth wrote:You are an impediment that the universe can no longer abide. Nature itself cries out for your destruction...
Tollan Phoenix wrote:Tollan Phoenix wrote:Sleipnir wrote:Ah, but who will hug the huggers?
The same people who mod the mods...Rienna wrote:I will hug the huggers! *hugs all of the huggers, and Jason himself*
woot! new rules! *hugs the new rules too*
Though, honestly Jason, rule 4 should be in more than one thread, not more than one forum.......
*hugs the rules, Jason, and the huggers regardless*
Well, then I guess the huggers get hugged by the mods, who also mod the mods...
Does this mean the watchers watch themselves also?
*Realizes he's breaking a rule* New rules are good. Not meaning to deflate the mood, but how are you planning on enforcing them in the face of Tok`ra's admitted actions during his 5 month ban show you can't just ban one account?
Shinobii wrote:Rule 17 is written incorrectly I think.
"17. No one in this game may put the name of another player or alliance in one of their own signatures/avatars/ anywhere on this forum, in any form of insulting manner or without the person's permission. "
They way it is written can easily be intepreted as saying that you cannot use another persons name or alliance in a post.
In order to make it clear, the trailing slash after avatars should be removed and a comma added, and the comma removed after forum.
I'm not an english major though so I could be incorrect.
And please don't get on my case about picking on someones english, I'm just trying to clear up an ambigous rule.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.