NEW sugestion, goodie great must read, all of you :)

[REK]

im jus a radical dreamer




I found a diamond in the dust!

[Quina Quen]

That was random REK. As random as actually finding a diamond in the dust. Perhaps you are just wREcKed?

[REK]

Radical
Erecton
King

[Quina Quen]

Rigourous
Endeavours
(in)Karezza
Link removed for appropriateness. Spacey

[REK]

Rigourous
Endeavours
(in)Karezza

you know way tooo much about me

[Quina Quen]

Don't tell me you forgot that it was actually me you were making sweet sweet karezza too?
Link removed for appropriateness. Spacey

[REK]

I have so many H O E S in so many area codes

[urogard]

The [possibly ever during] cap is one of the things destroying the game atm big guys who arent selling for naq are increasing their stats[MS/Fleets/Planets/Lvls] to insane heights wich is poor for the game itself as in a short while even people with same army size wont be evenly powerfull but the one whoes longer been there.......now thats normal but if one needs half year of income to come even close to the other his personal stats its not a good thing......

if it weren't for the cap i could be growing a nice 1 mil+ uu's per day and growing
so everyone should be happy that there are caps around

[Quina Quen]

I have so many H O E S in so many area codes

I thought you lo<3ed me?

Rebarbative
Egotistical
Katzenjammer

[REK]

I love them all

at the moment

[blahh]

dam i lost 2 bets, 1 was that it will get moved and it did, second one was that it will be spamed and it got. great going guys. Rave you can broker me for the 3 tril i ove you

but to keep the idea going, @thathorseavatarguy/girl yeah changes are good and keep the game alive but changes like planets, ms, trading,.. not changes like, uff now raise ATcap, now lower at cap, now we need more merc, no wait now there are too many merc,... if you get my point
If you try to addapt a game to the players you get a group of ppl who like it more, and a groop who like it less, in times the sizes of those groops change and so do things back and forward.. that was my point
J and the team can make new updates, and hope they catch on, but they shouldnt change things cause 10 ppl dont like it.
Players should addapt to the game, not the game to the players, thats my point.

[Lore]

Players should addapt to the game, not the game to the players, thats my point.

I totally agree with this. On the flip side there were and still are issues that need to be adressed. Loopholes that need to be closed and gross oversites that need to be corrected. I still maintain the planet updates was and is still the worst thing to happen to this game since I started playing. Its too far gone now to fix now so all we can do is deal with it.

[Sleipnir]

but to keep the idea going, @thathorseavatarguy/girl yeah changes are good and keep the game alive but changes like planets, ms, trading,.. not changes like, uff now raise ATcap, now lower at cap, now we need more merc, no wait now there are too many merc,... if you get my point
If you try to addapt a game to the players you get a group of ppl who like it more, and a groop who like it less, in times the sizes of those groops change and so do things back and forward.. that was my point
J and the team can make new updates, and hope they catch on, but they shouldnt change things cause 10 ppl dont like it.
Players should addapt to the game, not the game to the players, thats my point.

Sleipnir is the name, but if that's too difficult, you can call me Sleip.
It's impossible to fully predict how things will turn out whenever a change is made. Sometimes when a change is implemented, it is for the better, but as the game progresses, it shifts out of balance. It's hard to keep the game balanced for everyone. So sometimes things need to be tweaked. Or would you rather you still were only able to sab 1 weapon at a time?

And sometimes, 10 people play the game in a way admin never meant for it to be played, exploiting some feature. So, should he just leave it because the rest of the galaxy has to adapt to the exploit? Or should he fix the game so it becomes more about who has the best strategy/tactics and less about who found the best feature to exploit?

It's not that I don't see your point, but I'm afraid that unless Forum has some major all-fixing brainwave, some tweaking will be required every now and then.

[Envy]

I agree , admin make changes , also I heard he has such a big list he can work allot .

just leave the admin for once , I think hes a verry smart perhaps thougt it's allot of work to keep such site's running and damn I'm glad he does lol

[blahh]

sleip i ll try to remember it, but heres the thing,
i m not agains fixing bugs and loopholes and yeah users should report it.
i m not against "tweeking" things.
I m against some1 suggestin we need more merc change the merc system, he gets some support and merc sistem gets changed (personaly i like the new merc sistem) and than comes a group we dont want the new merc sistem its "unbalanced" or whateva and than it gets changed again (lets hope not)
or I want a superweapon in main.
or descension gets introduced and the second ppl start moaning about it in both ways to be easyer or harder more effect less effect, when descended negative bonus less bonus loss yada yada. admin said vac 1/2 bonuses gone descension 0 bonuses. And thats how it is and thats how it should be, if you dont like it adapt so that you will like it.

I m just giving examples..
and yeah i am complaining about ppl complaining, cause they get the game changed for evry1. PPL geraly play the game cause they like it the way it is for good and bad sides. But some feel they are smart enoguht to know whats best for all, and that privilegy should go only to the Bigdadyboss (J) as its his game

Ok got my pizza so i hope you got my point as it smells too good to stay away