Auto VOCATION Mode

you woude like to see AUTO Vocantion mode?

YES, after 1 week witout Log in
10
13%
YES, after 2 week witout Log in
18
23%
NO, i like the inactive acounts.
50
64%
 
Total votes: 78
Lord Sokar
almost spammer
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:46 pm
ID: 0
Location: Goo™'s Los Angeles Cellar

NDCDN wrote:Vacation after one week of inactivity and deletion after three months of vacation.

This game has been destroyed by players insisting on keeping all the inactive accounts as farms. How many great players have quit out of the boredom this game has become. It was so much fun in the old days, but the inactive accounts removed any real skill from the game.

Now the game needs something, and although I would prefer a total reset, this might be a more realistic idea (although it will never happen).

Still it is nice to see someone coming up with an idea that isn't in his own interest but in the interest of the game.




i like this idea, it'd get rid of a lot of the dead weight in the server
wmd9999
Forum Irregular
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:17 am
Race: System Lord
ID: 103304
Location: Virginia, USA

PSICOLIX wrote:
Lore wrote:
wmd9999 wrote:i voted no and i will tell you why. the reason this updated should not be implemented is because all of you stronger players were able to raid these accounts as much as you wanted. now that you have your 50-75 million army size why would need them now? so to stay ahead of everyone else you want to boot the accounts that are not active and are not helping you so why keep them? before i sold my 1st account raiding these account was done by all and was the quickest way to grow. do not penalize the players who are starting over or are new to the game and need a chance to catch up and the only way to do it quickly is to raid small inactive accounts like most of you did while growing. how can a small player raid if there are too few fish in the sea?


He has a valid point here


that will take some SKILLS, estrategy, planing.
Have a good alliance, a good CO(who don't remenber the time this counted).
wars coude make raid farms, farm for Naq will finaly requeire a strike.

thats whats wrong with this game, every1 want a easy way to grow, and you point is just for MAIN, chaos and QUANTUM, have resets

CURENT IN MAIN, you easily reach 50 Mill, than 75 Mill, than you is punished for you hard work, because to many lazy players. MASS farm is boring, you can get much more naq buying a proper strike and hit active players, just other dau i got 120 Bill from some1, that means 200k UNITS with 15 ats, take skills, strategy, planing...


however the lower players will become the farms and with less UU being raided can you imagine how much UU would cost? at least 1 bil/k. how can a small player pay these rates? having a large strike and attacking is great i have done it had top strike in the game for a while but i was able to have loads of supers because i did not intend to ascend again and did not have to think about the consequences of rebuilding. and would you take on officers costing you billions of naq each day? as for alliance we are both in the best alliance 8)
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

how many small players can afford to buy at 600mill/k?

with over 4 mill army, we cannot afford to buy much at that rate, so how many with 1 mill or less can afford it?

growth would actually be quite high for the smaller players if uu value was 1 bill/k, as then they can get lots of naq by selling just a few k uu's...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
Lord Silent Bob
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 897
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:13 pm
Alliance: The Magnificents
Race: Bundy Drinker
ID: 1905342
Location: Australia

Personally I voted No...there are merits to both sides of the arguments.

I agree some dead weight should be cut...but it needs to be selective...like accounts that have been dead for 6 months

on the other hand restricting the newer players would ultimately be to the detriment of the game. if a new player had to almost solely exist on his UP grow their army size..... I think a lot would soon give up due to both being farmed and being unable to farm.



Zeratul wrote:how many small players can afford to buy at 600mill/k?

with over 4 mill army, we cannot afford to buy much at that rate, so how many with 1 mill or less can afford it?

growth would actually be quite high for the smaller players if uu value was 1 bill/k, as then they can get lots of naq by selling just a few k uu's...


This last point only works if the player spends $$ on SS many players are unable to do so both from a financial point of view and due to their age...many players are not even old enough to have a drivers license let alone a credit card or paypal account

Ultimately and I have said this before...this game needs a constant influx of people to exist....take those away...we loose everything
Image
Image
Lord_Zeus
Forum Regular
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:28 am
ID: 0
Location: Where the world is better...

we could raise the starting value of new players so that they do not have to completely rely on raiding, perhaps to 1 mil (all lifers), and of course given to every player playing the game... ?
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Stickin it to the man!
User avatar
PSICOLIX
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 871
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:56 am
ID: 0

Lord_Zeus wrote:we could raise the starting value of new players so that they do not have to completely rely on raiding, perhaps to 1 mil (all lifers), and of course given to every player playing the game... ?


i don't like that. will make to easy.

But i agree, take all Inactive woude be bad for the Small,
BUT i still think we shoude get ride of at least 90% of the inactives, lest have 10% for be used as raid farm...
new Sing soon.
timex
Forum Grunt
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:45 am
ID: 0

I don't agree with this point, most people who have an army size of 50 + achieved that much by raiding and UP planets and both.... therefore in order for this to be done, that would mean that the entire main server has to be reset, so everyone has no UU to start off with , so then its fair because this way the people who already raided 20MIL plus, don't get the advantage.

To be honest I dont see this ever happening, every game has in active accounts. Its something you have to live with.

P.S PSILOX, Since you have the whole 80 mil army or so, I would like you to picture something starting your account all the way from the beginning now, and only relying on raiding/farming active accounts as most active accounts 1 have a defense, and 2 usually don't have UU worthy of raiding unless you're lucky to find one.
User avatar
noxOn`
Forum Irregular
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:33 pm
Alliance: I
Race: quit SGW
ID: 4913
Location: Slovenia-Nou mest
Contact:

wmd is right
SGC...... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO



Image
Castiel
Forum Expert
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:27 pm
Alliance: DDE
Race: Angel
ID: 10351
Contact:

Who do you suppose we should raid then ?


DKT~
What's it feel like? Took the wrong route
Watch it fall apart now you're knockin' at the wrong gate
For you to pay the toll, a price for you alone
The only deal you'll find, I'll gladly take your soul

Image

Eleven's hour is over now, the clock is striking Twelve.
Image
Se7en
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:13 pm
ID: 0

An idea to make the strong even stronger. Nah.
wmd9999
Forum Irregular
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:17 am
Race: System Lord
ID: 103304
Location: Virginia, USA

i may have come across a little strong and hot headed on this point but i do feel in the long run it would deter people from starting this game and staying with it long enough to enjoy it. maybe drop all people who have a UP of 2-4K and not active for say 4-6 months? a compromise to help all? just a thought.
Dean_S
Forum Elite
Posts: 1543
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:48 am
ID: 0
Location: staffordshire (england)
Contact:

i think this should be added, but alot of inactives would go in vac, so maybe i box should be ticked ingame, to activate this option


and BUMP
Image
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Forum Addict
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
ID: 0

cant agree i need those accounts to raid and new players need some pratice to start somewhere
Dean_S
Forum Elite
Posts: 1543
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:48 am
ID: 0
Location: staffordshire (england)
Contact:

[SGC_ReplicÅtors] wrote:cant agree i need those accounts to raid and new players need some pratice to start somewhere



read what i put, u have to do something to activate it

if they are inactive they cant activate it can they
Image
MLX
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:45 am

Re: Auto VOCATION Mode

PSICOLIX wrote:Vocantion

... Wow... worst spelling of vacation ever.

And that aside, I disagree. Simply because of how hard ascension would be.
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”