Quick Question

[buck]

Perhaps you failed to notice my previous post, the one detailing that that signature broke none of the rules that you or bazsy claimed it did.

Perhaps you failed to read every post that me and bazsy made showing infact, the complete oposite to what you did just say, in regards to, yes, yes it did break the forum rules, as shown several posts above.

Now are you going to continue wasteing my time acting like an idiot? Or do you have to be banned for a longer period in which time you can re-read the forum rules.

[Pungemo]

Now are you going to continue wasteing my time acting like an idiot?

3. The use of swearing and of abusive language is strictly forbidden.

7. You must post respectfully, whether or not you agree with an idea that has been posted

In addition, you have claimed numerous times that it has broken several rules, which it plainly CAN NOT have. I mean, the simple english of "bring pungemo back" does not contain a word that could be constued as disrespectful. It can't express defiance, as no emotion or opinion is even expressed.

[buck]

Now are you going to continue wasteing my time acting like an idiot?

3. The use of swearing and of abusive language is strictly forbidden.

7. You must post respectfully, whether or not you agree with an idea that has been posted

In addition, you have claimed numerous times that it has broken several rules, which it plainly CAN NOT have. I mean, the simple english of "bring pungemo back" does not contain a word that could be constued as disrespectful. It can't express defiance, as no emotion or opinion is even expressed.

3 : In cases of extreme measure we let that rule fly, after all, we are bad people.

7 : There was no idea posted, and if there was an idea posted it was infact an idea posted, it was proved incorrect by 3 moderators.

Your continued defiance in that aspect alone shows cause for banning. So, a banning it is then?

[Pungemo]

Well let's see, you've completely ignored the fact that what you've claimed about the signature being blatantly impossible.... but I suppose I should stop denying such laws of the english language step aside when you speak.... I mean, that would just be disrespectful

[buck]

Well let's see, you've completely ignored the fact that what you've claimed about the signature being blatantly impossible.... but I suppose I should stop denying such laws of the english language step aside when you speak.... I mean, that would just be disrespectful

Ive put up with enough disrespect and what goes with it for years, and i can see it when i see it, and thats all this thread is, You clearly cannot grasp the fact you are in the wrong, and are therefor lashing out at the moderators, thats not my problem, deal with it yourself.

[Bazsy]

Well let's see, you've completely ignored the fact that what you've claimed about the signature being blatantly impossible.... but I suppose I should stop denying such laws of the english language step aside when you speak.... I mean, that would just be disrespectful

Speaking about, if 3 supermods say you breaking the rules, you cant help yourself with denying it...

[Pungemo]

*sigh* please don't take the psycho-analysis stand... it's a sign of desperation.

@Bazsy: I'm more concerned with the general trends in the forum. I mean, moderators make mistakes. I can say that, and I don't blame moderators. Moderators will say "they're only human", however you yourselves seem unable to admit it when mistakes are made. That's my only concern really.

[buck]

*sigh* please don't take the psycho-analysis stand... it's a sign of desperation.

Its a sign of "your boring me now" .

3 mods have told you your in the wrong, you are infact therefor in the wrong. If you fail to comprehend that fact then i really dont care. End of.

Edit : If your only concern is that we dont admit mistakes are made then you should probally not be very concerned, ive admitted a few times in public when something has been my fault, and il be first to admit that in the past week in the mod forum ive had to apoligise and explain things twice which ive done out of action/charactor. So if thats your worry, you should probally stop worrying...

[Pungemo]

Buck, are you once more claiming moderators cannot make mistakes? I mean, I don't blame you for perhaps being a touch sensative, but it'll be easier if you just admit it.

EDIT: Well admit it buck. You know that banning people with the "bring back pungemo" signature was not within the rules, and was a gross over-reaction due to the wide-spread belief that moderators were abusing their power. I understand you wanting to quash that belief, but actually abusing the power was perhaps not a good way to do so.

[buck]

Buck, are you once more claiming moderators cannot make mistakes? I mean, I don't blame you for perhaps being a touch sensative, but it'll be easier if you just admit it.

READ my post, i havent once claimed that mods dont make mistakes, as ive said many times we are only human, except for sleipnir. We are stateing that on this instance and in this instance we have NOT made a mistake, you are in the wrong and that you should deal with it.

Edit : stop editing, its confuseing...

There was no rumour to quash, and if people want to make things up about us "abuseing" power they are quite welcome to, I personally am not bothered what they think, as anyone who thinks that, is a bit of a numpty head.

[Sleipnir]

The mod-bashing ends here. If you have an issue with a moderator or a decision made by a moderator, you take it up with them in PM. Therefore this thread is spam.

As for the sig discussion, I refer you to rule 21. Requesting a user be brought back from ban can be viewed as posting on behalf of said banned user.

Locked.

[Bazsy]

*sigh* please don't take the psycho-analysis stand... it's a sign of desperation.

@Bazsy: I'm more concerned with the general trends in the forum. I mean, moderators make mistakes. I can say that, and I don't blame moderators. Moderators will say "they're only human", however you yourselves seem unable to admit it when mistakes are made. That's my only concern really.

Well we know we can make mistakes, thats why we want to solve it by having 3 mod saying the same. 3 can make less mistakes.
On the other hand if I were you I would start thinking if 3 ppl say the opposite on the same issue....