The Xeno wrote:Corran Horn wrote:Read the book first, then post about those countries. Xeno, you read it too, cos you're falling into the same trap Apophis is in.
For the record, what trap am I falling into?
I can guess... but...

Trap of irrelevance.
Apophis is concerned bout the poor in the third world. I guess he means all those living in favelas/shantytowns. But:
he thinks this situation is because of capitalism - he's wrong
you think capitalism will help them - you're wrong
Why? Because there's no capitalism in shantytowns and it' never was. Capitalism is impossible there. More than that, socialism is impossible there as well (one may try with in though, but the experiment will end in even bigger disaster).
Why is this, how and what to do about this? - Read The Book!
In any case where the CIA may have planted a leader... yes that leader would be capitalist, but it does not follow that his country would automatically recieve a capitalist economy, fully tooled and running.
Let's not talk about CIA, OK? They've planted Osama, so...
Apophis The Great wrote:Can you tell in the context what gross means?
I dont see without knowing sense of word it's bad as I see Japan & Switzerland under, as Germany. So what is it about?
They didn't tell you in High School

?
Wikipedia wrote:The GDP of a country is defined as the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time. It is also considered the sum of value added at every stage of production of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time.
(...)
"Gross" means depreciation of capital stock is not included. With depreciation, with net investment instead of gross investment, it is the net domestic product.
A few words regarding the ranking posted:
This is GDP
growth which means how fast economy is growing, not how big, or how wealthy it is. For that we should use GDP per capita table. There Switzerland and Germany will be closer to the top. That table shows that these two countries are stagnant.
Also I chose 15 years average, as economy is always changing. This is arithmetic mean average (most commonly used). The problem with it is it's very sensitive to extreme values. IMO, to have a better picture there should be mode taken into consideration, but it's difficult to find this data.
Gatedialer wrote:Its harder for a large economy, such as the US economy, to grow as much as a small economy.
That's what is seems, but it isn't true, just coincidence. Look at China. Most of large economies today have the problem of state meddling with them. That meddling causes unexpected, and mostly unpredictable tensions within the system, thus making it more difficult for the economy to grow.
Patrick: if you were a head of a charity and knew there's more money to take, wouldn't you be hassling ppl for it?
And charities, as private organizations should exist. It's private, so it's OK with me.