Hensenshi wrote:If you want to make race mean something again, make ascended race mean something, and make your ascended race choice have an impact on your account in both main and ascension. Something like this:
Each ascension you get 2% to all stats per ascension. This means at 6 ascension you've got a 12% all around bonus. But each race has it's bonuses, but make them obscure.
Tolah get cheaper supers in both attack and defense. In ascended they receive a 5% discount to strike and def modifiers.
Indu make less lifers when training miners up(small like only 1% decrease). In ascended they get a 5% discount to production.
Ajna get cheaper miners(500 or something like that). In ascended they get cheaper systems.
Ori get cheaper spies and AC units. In ascension their covert and assassin modifiers are cheaper.
Then after that, each advanced race(talking main again), receive 10% to the stat that their race origins. (IE: nano's get 10% to covert, SL's get 10% to income, ancients get 10% to def, and Tollan get 10% to strike).
I like it.
Finally we got an improved suggestion
and not nononono i hate it ahhhh my poor account nononono 
.Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Apophis ™ wrote:Because:Turkey wrote:I dont get why Tokra would get such less % bonuses?
-They not even here and would probly never get ingame
-They had no attacks, no MS by themselves, only covert and def capacities...well could probably add 5% MS then
Do you want me to slap you over? If you make a suggestion, make it balanced... If Tok'ra would be here, they deserve the same balanced bonus stats as others do... and don't try to make me mad with your anti-Tok'ra policy, that belongs to RP forums, not when making a suggestion. Seriously, get over yourself, kiddo.
Teal'auc
Tok'ra don't even exist as a race ingame as goaulds or tauri. So as I'm PRETTY sure admin said already he will not add races, I could say 0% bonus on all tokra stats or 35% coverts 30% defense 15% attack it will not matter as I know admin will not add tokra, jaffas, sodans or any idea like that.
I could modify stats and make them balanced, but that will matter little considering admin doesn't want new races, he said it already I think.
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Apophis ™ wrote:Because:Turkey wrote:I dont get why Tokra would get such less % bonuses?
-They not even here and would probly never get ingame
-They had no attacks, no MS by themselves, only covert and def capacities...well could probably add 5% MS then
Do you want me to slap you over? If you make a suggestion, make it balanced... If Tok'ra would be here, they deserve the same balanced bonus stats as others do... and don't try to make me mad with your anti-Tok'ra policy, that belongs to RP forums, not when making a suggestion. Seriously, get over yourself, kiddo.
Teal'auc
Tok'ra don't even exist as a race ingame as goaulds or tauri. So as I'm PRETTY sure admin said already he will not add races, I could say 0% bonus on all tokra stats or 35% coverts 30% defense 15% attack it will not matter as I know admin will not add tokra, jaffas, sodans or any idea like that.
I could modify stats and make them balanced, but that will matter little considering admin doesn't want new races, he said it already I think.
Epic wrote:I don't like this idea, I worked hard to get my LG+1 and its 30% all around bonuses, unlike some people my account isn't yet at the point where if I want to build a 100b strike then the extra naq and uu required without bonuses is nothing to me, thus it would only help the bigger - and what is supposed to come out of it? A meaning to having a race, more RP? That just ain't going to happen.
SGW may not have SGW-esque RP in it, but it certainly contains alot of roleplaying, just look at whats has happened in the game recenly, HUGE war, both sides gaining support, is this not a role-playing element, the very fact that we are even organised into alliances can be considered as 'role-playing' can it not?
As for making the races different by option of bonuses, I really don't think that would make any differences, except push people away from the race that they like being (part of this is due to role playing), I am an ancient as the asgard's and ancient were my favorite race from the stargate series, the bonuses you proposed suck for ancients and having to go back to have an uneven strike/defense would probably make me switch to a more balanced race just for the sake of my account whereas i'd prefer to be seen as an Ancient.
I'm all for listening to new idea's but this would change the game alot and most likely spoil it, I prefer additions to gameplay rather than tinkering with with the core elements that keep this game what it is.
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
If we put race stats bigger that would make huge difference between ascended and unascended.
I can edit my %.
But I believe Hensenshi get it better with his idea.
Ancients unbalanced here? Normal. Tauri/tollan meant to have good strike and Asgards Ancients to have good def. That has been always like that!
I could balance them, but that will end eventually as crappy current system we in...so...not balance them too much!
