Need a 100bil defence to disapear?
-
Ben_S
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 12:25 am
- ID: 0
-
raistlin majere
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:46 am
- Alliance: Withheld
- Race: Nanotimaster
- ID: 8675309
- Location: NorCal
- Hells__Angel
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:38 am
-
BELISKNER
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 7:19 am
- Alliance: Lone Wolf ~ Ex-Dirty Dozen
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 6116
- Location: North Wales, U.K.
-
J.S.
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:41 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Human
- ID: 22325
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Contact:
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
Mister IHaveATypoInMySig, could you mass ID 72594?
k thx bai
k thx bai
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
Not much satisfaction in massing 0 defense, but if I tease you abotut he typo in your sig, you might do it.
I'll buy a defense JUST FOR YOU
EDIT: now at an unbeatable 245mil defense
I'll buy a defense JUST FOR YOU
EDIT: now at an unbeatable 245mil defense
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!









