Raven wrote:i think 6
yeah we all think about 6
Raven wrote:i think 6
Red XIII wrote:Just blame Omega instead. Much easier than writing an entire paragraph about a problem.




buck wrote:Some are questionable....
Only one springs to mind...and thats reborn....
x2 i just accidently abandoned that planet i just tookteesdale wrote:im going to start calling you Mathod man... because i swear to god your as dense as Mathlord is when it comes to arguing.
Ignore valid points from everyone else and believe your own verbal diarrhea, the pair of you.




Red XIII wrote:Just blame Omega instead. Much easier than writing an entire paragraph about a problem.
RepliJake wrote:[Alpha]Blackburn wrote:RepliJake wrote:Taxonomist3 wrote:hmm... jake, can you name them?
Why?
lol, I love that kind of humor
My apollogies, there are 7, one quit and became head admin on the forums.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.



Or do we all have to excuse ourselves to the ladies room and talk about you behind your backs.Kaboomer wrote: "Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for. "
Jack O'Neill wrote:We have Cameras everywhere
Kaboomer wrote: "Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for. "
Jack O'Neill wrote:Don't question Jake!
WeaponX wrote:i quit the game, good luck trying to extort resources out of me you jackasses


REK wrote:I hate **Filtered**GunZ wrote:Eat me
