I was wondering about the following:
Many people have quotes in their signatures quoting what other people have posted on these boards here. Is that ok with the forum rules?
I mean in regards of using someone elses name in your signature etc.
Could a moderator please enlighten me?
Thank you.
Forum rule clarification
- geisha
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2810
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:28 pm
- Race: Pastafarian
- ID: 65545
- Location: The beer volcano in FSM heaven
-
DaDigi
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2358
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:29 am
- Alliance: I hate all equally
- Race: Tri-athalon
- ID: 46811
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Re: Forum rule clarification
17. You may not put the name of another player or alliance in one of your own signatures/avatars/names anywhere on this forum, in any form of insulting manner or without the aforementioned player's permission
This rule is a little iffy, and should be reworded. I'll forward this to pookie.
DaDigi
Former Moderator for Market & Suggestions/Reports
Former Moderator for Market & Suggestions/Reports
- geisha
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2810
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:28 pm
- Race: Pastafarian
- ID: 65545
- Location: The beer volcano in FSM heaven
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Forum rule clarification
I'd say that if the following criteria are met, it's cool to post a quote with the name of a person in it:
Basically, it gives someone the option to not have their name in someone else's signature, should they feel they want to keep a low profile, or for any personal reasons. That viewpoint is expressed in the rules, but I can
clarify too.
J
- 1. The quoted text was posted publicly on these forums and is still visible to the public
2. The quote must be 100% accurate in its textual content
3. The quoted person doesn't request it to be removed respectfully
Basically, it gives someone the option to not have their name in someone else's signature, should they feel they want to keep a low profile, or for any personal reasons. That viewpoint is expressed in the rules, but I can
clarify too.
J
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!


