The Xeno wrote:We're pretty screwed after all, if our president is Satan on earth - and Saddam Huissien is a martyr defending the oil against greedy America.
Therefore, I reject that world view on the grounds that, even if it is the truth - I am no worse off by denying it.*
This is exactly why I refuse to take you or your opinions seriously. When it comes to addressing 9/11 or even the word conspiracy this is the conclussion you always seem to jump to. Indeed I agree we do have completely different percieved outlooks on these events and whats behind them. But the difference in approaching, discussing and debating them is even more disturbingly different. While I address people who pass judgement on a person labeling him of her as a conspiracy theorist, you would rather blow it up into an entire conspiracy debate. That outside of your personal beliefs and understanding of something, there is no truth and no room for questioning, almost as if you were living in a box of recycled answers which you and only you could possibly ascribe to in todays world and reality. Again I have to admit, this is why I am so unable to accept your method for arguement. Not just because it's overwhelmingly hard to see where your going with it all and where you'll end up next. But rather because you draw on a myriad of examples which technically have nothing to do with the topic at hand outside of the relevance of the word 'conspiracy' and what your taking from it.
There is no reason to be bias in todays world dispite whatever you've learned to believe, I would rather you stop trying to mask your vendetta against conspirators in such a diminishingly effective fashion. Don't talk about how and why you will never believe in something you can't understand or want to think about. Because thats like starting an arguement and demanding that no one agrees with you because you don't even acknowledge their arguements just because you can't and refuse to try and understand where they are coming from, the evidence to support their claims and their conclusions based on them. All because you observe it as being completely beside the 'real world truth' and not another perspective of it.
I think you refered to it being like mathematics, in the sense that you're asked to believe an answer to a problem which you know is wrong. Well I garantee you, there is no possible way for any person, expert, resercher or conspirator who simply observed what happend that day or the crappy investigative work done after wards. To say that they know beyond a shadow of a doubt what happened, how it happened and why it happened. I would put forth it's more simply a matter of algebra.
9/11
1 + X(Y) = 4
They said X = 1 and Y = 2
If X(being the muslims with connections to bin laden on both hijacked planes) and Y(being the actual reason for the wtc collapse) were the answers the world was asked to believe after 9/11. And in the truth of mathematics where numbers never lie, where I'm telling you that you can still get the end result of 4 (which will be the collapse of the buildings lets say). But you refuse to believe that X actually equals 0 (there were no muslims involved with any connection to bin laden) and Y actually equals 4 (the buildings never could have collapsed completely from fire from two air liners crashing into them even though they were designed to withstand just that...). Doesn't that make you unwilling to think out of 'your' box? I think so..
As I said, just draw your own conclussions, but for god's sake, don't just ignore the information or shun it all together just because someone else is saying "CONSPIRACY!". That is childish and an unrealistic way of actually trying to understand something and find the truth. Even IF that means you don't know everything and have to admit some things you rather not. Thats what I would like to think we're all capable of, wouldn't you?
This isn't all directed at Xeno guys...
?
