StarGateWars Forums

Looks good to me.

Well done to all the organizers

merely as a name, it can be misleading, but a definition will most likely be included in the first post to clear up misunderstandings...

Zeratul wrote:merely as a name, it can be misleading, but a definition will most likely be included in the first post to clear up misunderstandings...

most definitely so.

Zeratul wrote:merely as a name, it can be misleading, but a definition will most likely be included in the first post to clear up misunderstandings...

But someone will have it as a signature for a year.

Why not just change the name to "Tournament 1st place" etc.

knight37 wrote:

Zeratul wrote:merely as a name, it can be misleading, but a definition will most likely be included in the first post to clear up misunderstandings...

But someone will have it as a signature for a year.

Why not just change the name to "Tournament 1st place" etc.

because, as I said.. that's not what it represents. It represents an award for the best ingame fighter. It's not a mix of definition. I have already explained this.

The winner is being determined by fighting on 'equal' terms to weigh up skill of player, not account or currency investment. The first round is on.. if you want in it.. enter.

Simple thing, as I said before. You want a shot at it.. enter it. Simple as that. There is no excuse, if you're here to complain you're here to fight and participate and do it the fair way.

HippyFool wrote:Looks good to me.

Well done to all the organizers

muhaha, hippy, your award sigs look like they won't be useful anymore

I'm guessing we just give Duderanch "Noob moment if the Year" now? lol

Awards are now live...

Zeratul wrote:Awards are now live...

Awards were moved forward as everything was ready!

Why are we having a tournament in 2010 to give an award for 2009? LOL

if you keep this format next year, you need to run it in december so its actually in the year your saying its for.

Guess I need to go read some rules on this, don't really see why someone should have to pay 1 trill naq to have a shot at the title, but I'm sure you have explained it in that thread.

Lore wrote:Guess I need to go read some rules on this, don't really see why someone should have to pay 1 trill naq to have a shot at the title, but I'm sure you have explained it in that thread.

Because it keeps the smaller players from entering the tourney.

knight37 wrote:

Lore wrote:Guess I need to go read some rules on this, don't really see why someone should have to pay 1 trill naq to have a shot at the title, but I'm sure you have explained it in that thread.

Because it keeps the smaller players from entering the tourney.

so you admit it doesnt allow everyone to participate nor allow true "even grounds".

intresting.

Everyone knows the awards is a hard thing to run and create rules for. Everyone knows that people get others to come here just to vote. That's why it's difficult to let accounts that have like never posted actually vote.

Like tonight there were 76 people on the forums, when was the last time that happened? Ah right, last years TGW Awards.

I don't envy those running the awards system.

Clarkey wrote:I don't envy those running the awards system.

Nor do I.

Lore wrote:

knight37 wrote:

Lore wrote:Guess I need to go read some rules on this, don't really see why someone should have to pay 1 trill naq to have a shot at the title, but I'm sure you have explained it in that thread.

Because it keeps the smaller players from entering the tourney.

so you admit it doesnt allow everyone to participate nor allow true "even grounds".

intresting.

I didn't say anything lmao..

there is an entry fee to give the winner a substantial prize. Anything wrong with that? Any account could farm 1 trill naq or find the resources required within 3-4 weeks.