StarGateWars Forums

Mendicant Bias wrote:

Legendary Apophis wrote:

Offensive Bias wrote:
My support is for something basic. Right now, Israel is among those. Back then, it was with Nazi Germany. A few years ago, it was with the USA. A century ago, it was with Britain.. ages ago, it was with Rome.
Let's just say.. my support is threefold, and has on occasion focused in one entity: ἐντελέχεια, ἐνέργεια, and δύναμις.

You cannot be serious..

Was I around back then? I don't remember. Maybe, maybe not.

All I know is this. From 1934 through 1942, Germany was invincible, and thus undeserving of criticism. The rest of the world was too weak to stand up to them, or refused to, and power without action is just as weak and pathetic as action without power. Actions taken by Germany while stripped of their invincibility i.e. 1943 and onwards, were merely attempts to postpone their inevitable fall. This includes their anomalous behaviour in regards to minorities. That is, as usual, deserving of criticism.

However, up until today, no power in the world has matched the potential Nazi Germany had. A country not bound by conventional morality is a country free to expand into areas of science and rational humanism that no one else dare venture into.


As usual however, you are more likely to drop back into your irrational "badbadbadbadbadbadbad" pattern as you are to experience a paradigm shift. One that I had, and you didn't. Expand that mind of yours. Dare venture out into the unknown, or die in the pathetic state of mind that you and most of the human race are stuck in. The future is calling. Don't hang up.

Oh yes admiring the nazis means being better than other humans. Ha ha ha.
Surprisingly enough, the skinhead don't appear to me as very intelligent.

The last paragraph is the most horrible attempt at propaganda I have heard recently.
You think I am definitely stupid to say that. Sadly, I'm not that stupid, sorry.
I can just laugh at people being manipulated into believing all the far left or far right or fundamentalism bs. Such naivety is...disturbing.

Legendary Apophis wrote:

Mendicant Bias wrote:

Legendary Apophis wrote:

Offensive Bias wrote:
My support is for something basic. Right now, Israel is among those. Back then, it was with Nazi Germany. A few years ago, it was with the USA. A century ago, it was with Britain.. ages ago, it was with Rome.
Let's just say.. my support is threefold, and has on occasion focused in one entity: ἐντελέχεια, ἐνέργεια, and δύναμις.

You cannot be serious..

Was I around back then? I don't remember. Maybe, maybe not.

All I know is this. From 1934 through 1942, Germany was invincible, and thus undeserving of criticism. The rest of the world was too weak to stand up to them, or refused to, and power without action is just as weak and pathetic as action without power. Actions taken by Germany while stripped of their invincibility i.e. 1943 and onwards, were merely attempts to postpone their inevitable fall. This includes their anomalous behaviour in regards to minorities. That is, as usual, deserving of criticism.

However, up until today, no power in the world has matched the potential Nazi Germany had. A country not bound by conventional morality is a country free to expand into areas of science and rational humanism that no one else dare venture into.


As usual however, you are more likely to drop back into your irrational "badbadbadbadbadbadbad" pattern as you are to experience a paradigm shift. One that I had, and you didn't. Expand that mind of yours. Dare venture out into the unknown, or die in the pathetic state of mind that you and most of the human race are stuck in. The future is calling. Don't hang up.

Oh yes admiring the nazis means being better than other humans. Ha ha ha.
Surprisingly enough, the skinhead don't appear to me as very intelligent.

The last paragraph is the most horrible attempt at propaganda I have heard recently.
You think I am definitely stupid to say that. Sadly, I'm not that stupid, sorry.
I can just laugh at people being manipulated into believing all the far left or far right or fundamentalism bs. Such naivety is...disturbing.

I accept you anyway. Really, your lack of understanding is not an issue for me. Your monstruous lack of respect to ideas I might or might not hold, however, is. All this talk about 'stupid'.


/ignore.

Legendary Apophis wrote:My lack of understanding. Isn't it more my lack of following your kind of reasoning? The "lack of understanding", I could say that to someone thinking differently than I do, and same person could say so to me. I've been there too. Everyone has.

Sweetheart, I really don't care whether you agree with me or not. I am annoyed by your choice to just flame me.
As you should very well know, it makes no difference to me whether or not people agree with me. I'll say what I want. If I want to say Pol Pot was a marvel of mankind, I'll say Pol Pot was a marvel of mankind. You should stop being so damned self-centered and not read my words as if I am trying to convert you or something. Some people are best left in their patterns of thought. You, and I.

Legendary Apophis wrote:As for monstruous lack of respect, I don't like being manipulated into other pathes like you tried to do. You start ranting about greatness of hitler and nazi germany while it wasn't the subject at all (well, BNP is far right, but that's about it). Think I would sing along while you post your speech about nazi greatness? Just because I vote for Sarkozy doesn't mean I am part of the "nazi germany was great". The paragraph you posted in the end in itself wasn't wrong. But considering ideas beforewards, the neutralistic paragraph wasn't so much neutral anymore.

*sigh* As I said, you are too egocentric to understand that I am not telling you to think as I might think, because most of the time, my posts aren't even representative to what I think. And NEVER, unless I specifically say I am talking to YOU, am I talking to you. Stop reading my posts as if I am.

Legendary Apophis wrote:Afterall, it's not like you respect all ideas, as you don't really respect Avenger's ideas...

Ask him. I disagree, but I do respect his ideas. Don't pretend I don't.


Oh, and read your PM. Next time you post your hateful rage, I will not reply. Before you claim a 'victory', consider that I will just not have read your secretions.

slow down there!

the nazi party got into power because they had without a doubt the most charismatic person (that can historically be proven to be non-fiction) to ever grace the world and i personally would say labour was more like the nazis 10 years ago than the BNP are today

the BNP put white british people first, so they are called racist.
the BNP don't allow non whites to join their party, so i can't be disrupted from within - so they are called racists

i don't support the BNP because they have some really bad ideas, but they do have the concept the british want

No matter what you think, say or do eventually we will have the far right in power soon enough

well the USA have the far right in right now don't they?

Satan the Moo wrote:slow down there!

the nazi party got into power because they had without a doubt the most charismatic person (that can historically be proven to be non-fiction) to ever grace the world and i personally would say labour was more like the nazis 10 years ago than the BNP are today

the BNP put white british people first, so they are called racist.
the BNP don't allow non whites to join their party, so i can't be disrupted from within - so they are called racists

i don't support the BNP because they have some really bad ideas, but they do have the concept the british want

No matter what you think, say or do eventually we will have the far right in power soon enough

Indeed. It is only natural. Then after a period of right-wing rule, people will realise that they don't deliver either, and then -having forgotten the previous failures- go back to left wing. It's a swinging pendulum.

Satan the Moo wrote:well the USA have the far right in right now don't they?

Hum. No? Obama? While in the political landscape of the world he may be right-ish, when you look at the rest of American politicians, most are more right wing.
Basically the whole politics seem to be shifted there, so that 'center' to them is 'center right' in the Old World.

Why because he calls himself black?, he can't be a racist? only whites can be racsit?

[spoiler] 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'[/spoiler]
[SOURCE: From "From Dreams of My Father" by Barack Hussein Obama, page-15]




[spoiler]'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white[/spoiler]
[SOURCE: From "From Dreams of My Father" by Barack Hussein Obama]



[spoiler]'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.' While in college, Obama wrote (he) disapproved of what he called other "half-breeds” who gravitated toward whites instead of blacks.[/spoiler]
[SOURCE: From "From Dreams of My Father" by Barack Hussein Obama, pages-99-100]


in my opion race is somthing people use to seperate themselves from one another

wake up spell the beans theres one race and thats human!

Satan the Moo wrote:Why because he calls himself black?, he can't be a racist? only whites can be racsit?

You'll have to explain the automatic leap from "right wing" to "racist" for me.
And how comments about someone's race put someone in the "right" wing.. honestly.. do you think Stalin -let's use an ArchLeftie- would've wanted to dine with a black man? Racism is something of all political denominations, not just a "right wing" phenomenon.
Wake up.

Satan the Moo wrote:[spoiler] 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'[/spoiler][SOURCE: From "From Dreams of My Father" by Barack Hussein Obama, page-15][spoiler]'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white[/spoiler][SOURCE: From "From Dreams of My Father" by Barack Hussein Obama][spoiler]'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.' While in college, Obama wrote (he) disapproved of what he called other "half-breeds” who gravitated toward whites instead of blacks.[/spoiler][SOURCE: From "From Dreams of My Father" by Barack Hussein Obama, pages-99-100]
in my opion race is somthing people use to seperate themselves from one another

wake up spell the beans theres one race and thats human!

Arrogant specieist. What about the dolphins!

So I separate myself from an African. What gives? Whether I do that based on geographical or on physiological attributes.. it's all the same.
I am not my neighbour. Does that make me racist?


Right.

im happy sleeping thank-you

dolphins live in the sea

and well as for the neighbour issues i wouldn't mind being them

Satan the Moo wrote:through a throurgh scentific research i have come across who will win the next election

in the semis we have:

Labour Rose
Lib Dem Bird
Conservative Tree
BNP Flag

it will happen like this:

semi 1
[spoiler]larbours rose Vs Conservatives Tree - Tree blocks out the roses light and it dies. Conservative through to the final[/spoiler]

Semi 2
[spoiler]BNPs Flag Vs Lib Dems brid - Lib Dems bird in mid flight flies into the flag, get wrapped up and plummits to the ground. BNP progress to the finals[/spoiler]

Runners up final
[spoiler]Labours Rose Vs Lib Dems Bird - The bird couldn't pull up the rose and was cut massivly and retreats. Labour wins[/spoiler]

The Final
[spoiler]BNPs Flag Vs Conservative Tree - BNPs flag get blow into the tree and ripped on its branches. Conservatives win[/spoiler]


OR This:

The League
[spoiler]played Won Drawn Lost PTS
Conservative 4 3 1 0 10
BNP 4 2 1 1 7
Labour 4 2 1 1 7
Lib Dem 4 0 2 2 2
UKIP 4 0 2 2 2[/spoiler]

I say, Bring back 'The Monster Raving Loony Party' they cant do any worse than the rest of these muppets

The long version

Lets face it, democracy is a popularity contest and will never work, it goes something like this,

1) Promise whatever it takes to get power
2) When you get power and cant deliver on your promises, just say its because the last guys in power made a far worse mess than you knew when you made the promises
3) When you've been in power to long to blame the ones before you, start making silly laws to pander to the press that make no real difference in RL
4) When you spent all the money pandering to the press and trying to look good, start inventing new hidden taxes and sell off public owned stuff to raise more money
5) When you sold everything, spent everything, borrow more, and invade countries with Oil, Gas or Gold
6) Now you are truly screwed, lose an election and let the new guys start again at step 1

Just go to work you all you 9-5 wage slaves, elect idiots who claim they will make your lives easier, pay your taxes, borrow money you'll have to keep working til you die to pay off so you can the buy the crap adverts say will make you happy, and try not to think about the fact that the oil & gas is running out, and the overfished over polluted oceans will flood our lands because we'll probably be dead by the time that happens so it wont be our problem

The short version

'Eat and drink and screw because theres nothing else to do' - Jarvis Cocker

^ love it lol