British elections soon to come who'll win??

[Rabbid Thom]

through a throurgh scentific research i have come across who will win the next election

in the semis we have:

Labour Rose
Lib Dem Bird
Conservative Tree
BNP Flag

it will happen like this:

semi 1
[spoiler]larbours rose Vs Conservatives Tree - Tree blocks out the roses light and it dies. Conservative through to the final[/spoiler]

Semi 2
[spoiler]BNPs Flag Vs Lib Dems brid - Lib Dems bird in mid flight flies into the flag, get wrapped up and plummits to the ground. BNP progress to the finals[/spoiler]

Runners up final
[spoiler]Labours Rose Vs Lib Dems Bird - The bird couldn't pull up the rose and was cut massivly and retreats. Labour wins[/spoiler]

The Final
[spoiler]BNPs Flag Vs Conservative Tree - BNPs flag get blow into the tree and ripped on its branches. Conservatives win[/spoiler]


OR This:

The League
[spoiler]played Won Drawn Lost PTS
Conservative 4 3 1 0 10
BNP 4 2 1 1 7
Labour 4 2 1 1 7
Lib Dem 4 0 2 2 2
UKIP 4 0 2 2 2[/spoiler]

[buck]

Lib Lab Coalition to keep the tories out.

Mark my words...

[Mordack]

The Conservatives will win because Labor will lose.

[Rabbid Thom]

it doesn't mater who wins brussels still says NO



i think we need to do a sgw elections lol winner becomes mod of the politics lol

[Juliette]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

[Rabbid Thom]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

yes it is true they will eventually get in

[Legendary Apophis]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

yes it is true they will eventually get in

Lol far right leading UK? Civil war!

it doesn't mater who wins brussels still says NO



i think we need to do a sgw elections lol winner becomes mod of the politics lol

No to what?

[dark lord tacoma]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

i hope not or we are all doomed to be branded as a rasist hatefull counterie like the germans were due to hitler

[Juliette]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

i hope not or we are all doomed to be branded as a rasist hatefull counterie like the germans were due to hitler

Pfft.. back in the day, it was bound to happen anyway. The fact that Germany had a measure of success with their setup made them the poster child for evil. Same thing with any dictator who has a decent level of success. For some reason, certain people cannot accept them for the good leaders they are.

It's a crying shame.

(In the case of Griffin, however, one can only hypothesise to his effectiveness.)

[Legendary Apophis]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

i hope not or we are all doomed to be branded as a rasist hatefull counterie like the germans were due to hitler

Pfft.. back in the day, it was bound to happen anyway. The fact that Germany had a measure of success with their setup made them the poster child for evil. Same thing with any dictator who has a decent level of success. For some reason, certain people cannot accept them for the good leaders they are.

It's a crying shame.

*facepalm*

A good leader isn't a person who leads his country to downfall and self-destruction and furthermore trying to run away either by escaping or commiting suicide. And that's the outcome of more than 1/2 of dictators of past and present.

Yes it's a crying shame some people would consider Hitler or the likes as a good leader.
While infact they were **Filtered** cowards running away from their fate after screwing up their population.

[Juliette]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

i hope not or we are all doomed to be branded as a rasist hatefull counterie like the germans were due to hitler

Pfft.. back in the day, it was bound to happen anyway. The fact that Germany had a measure of success with their setup made them the poster child for evil. Same thing with any dictator who has a decent level of success. For some reason, certain people cannot accept them for the good leaders they are.

It's a crying shame.

*facepalm*

A good leader isn't a person who leads his country to downfall and self-destruction. And that's the outcome of more than 1/2 of dictators of past and present.

Yes it's a crying shame some people would consider Hitler as a good leader.

Downfall and self-destruction? ROFL
So a failure of the German military to stand against the Full Might of the Free World (a.k.a. USA and the rest of the incidental 'Allies') is Hitler's fault?



Now if Germany self-destructed without being mauled by the bullying nations of this world who were jealous of their success, THAT might have been Hitlers fault. But it didn't. That's why the rest of the world decided to destroy them.
Seriously, where you get these weird anti-German ideas..

[Legendary Apophis]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

i hope not or we are all doomed to be branded as a rasist hatefull counterie like the germans were due to hitler

Pfft.. back in the day, it was bound to happen anyway. The fact that Germany had a measure of success with their setup made them the poster child for evil. Same thing with any dictator who has a decent level of success. For some reason, certain people cannot accept them for the good leaders they are.

It's a crying shame.

*facepalm*

A good leader isn't a person who leads his country to downfall and self-destruction. And that's the outcome of more than 1/2 of dictators of past and present.

Yes it's a crying shame some people would consider Hitler as a good leader.

Downfall and self-destruction? ROFL
So a failure of the German military to stand against the Full Might of the Free World (a.k.a. USA and the rest of the incidental 'Allies') is Hitler's fault?



Now if Germany self-destructed without being mauled by the bullying nations of this world who were jealous of their success, THAT might have been Hitlers fault. But it didn't. That's why the rest of the world decided to destroy them.
Seriously, where you get these weird anti-German ideas..

Jealous of their success? (never heard such silly thing until today on the matter btw, read so far is hillarious though)
Wouldn't you mean more like fighting against those barbarians who wanted to exterminate in gas chambers the exact same people who now partly live in the country you "support" from your userbar?

I'm not anti German, I'm infact anti nazi scum. Those **Filtered** idiots didn't understand anything aside of building weapons and spread massive bs to any idiot who was stupid enough to listen. Aryans being the superior race? Who's retarded enough to believe that it is even a race?

Linking being anti hitler and nazis with being "anti-german". Tsk tsk THAT is anti-german!

I'm sure however that if Nick Griffin becomes PM there's going to be problems.

[Juliette]

It is the future.
Nick Griffin will win, face some kind of personal struggle and get himself a bit more charismatic figurehead for his gang.

i hope not or we are all doomed to be branded as a rasist hatefull counterie like the germans were due to hitler

Pfft.. back in the day, it was bound to happen anyway. The fact that Germany had a measure of success with their setup made them the poster child for evil. Same thing with any dictator who has a decent level of success. For some reason, certain people cannot accept them for the good leaders they are.

It's a crying shame.

*facepalm*

A good leader isn't a person who leads his country to downfall and self-destruction. And that's the outcome of more than 1/2 of dictators of past and present.

Yes it's a crying shame some people would consider Hitler as a good leader.

Downfall and self-destruction? ROFL
So a failure of the German military to stand against the Full Might of the Free World (a.k.a. USA and the rest of the incidental 'Allies') is Hitler's fault?



Now if Germany self-destructed without being mauled by the bullying nations of this world who were jealous of their success, THAT might have been Hitlers fault. But it didn't. That's why the rest of the world decided to destroy them.
Seriously, where you get these weird anti-German ideas..

Jealous of their success?
Wouldn't you mean more like fighting against those barbarians who wanted to exterminate in gas chambers the exact same people who now partly live in the country you "support" from your userbar?

I'm not anti German, I'm infact anti nazi scum. Those **Filtered** idiots didn't understand anything aside of building weapons and spread massive bs to any idiot who was stupid enough to listen. Aryans being the superior race? Who's retarded enough to believe that?

Linking being anti hitler and nazis with being "anti-german". Tsk tsk THAT is anti-german!

Pfft. Barbarians? Hardly. Enlightened despots, definitely. But as with all things, there is only one flaw to be found there.
You who would put "Nazi scum" in gas chambers yourself (as you or one of your multies has said earlier), are you the selfsame person who would now call that 'barbarism'?

My support is for something basic. Right now, Israel is among those. Back then, it was with Nazi Germany. A few years ago, it was with the USA. A century ago, it was with Britain.. ages ago, it was with Rome.
Let's just say.. my support is threefold, and has on occasion focused in one entity: ἐντελέχεια, ἐνέργεια, and δύναμις.

[Legendary Apophis]

My support is for something basic. Right now, Israel is among those. Back then, it was with Nazi Germany. A few years ago, it was with the USA. A century ago, it was with Britain.. ages ago, it was with Rome.
Let's just say.. my support is threefold, and has on occasion focused in one entity: ἐντελέχεια, ἐνέργεια, and δύναμις.

You cannot be serious..

The rest is bs. Enlighted despots? Don't make me laugh please. Antisemitic self-admiring scums definitely.

[Juliette]

My support is for something basic. Right now, Israel is among those. Back then, it was with Nazi Germany. A few years ago, it was with the USA. A century ago, it was with Britain.. ages ago, it was with Rome.
Let's just say.. my support is threefold, and has on occasion focused in one entity: ἐντελέχεια, ἐνέργεια, and δύναμις.

You cannot be serious..

Was I around back then? I don't remember. Maybe, maybe not.

All I know is this. From 1934 through 1942, Germany was invincible, and thus undeserving of criticism. The rest of the world was too weak to stand up to them, or refused to, and power without action is just as weak and pathetic as action without power. Actions taken by Germany while stripped of their invincibility i.e. 1943 and onwards, were merely attempts to postpone their inevitable fall. This includes their anomalous behaviour in regards to minorities. That is, as usual, deserving of criticism.

However, up until today, no power in the world has matched the potential Nazi Germany had. A country not bound by conventional morality is a country free to expand into areas of science and rational humanism that no one else dare venture into.


As usual however, you are more likely to drop back into your irrational "badbadbadbadbadbadbad" pattern as you are to experience a paradigm shift. One that I had, and you didn't. Expand that mind of yours. Dare venture out into the unknown, or die in the pathetic state of mind that you and most of the human race are stuck in. The future is calling. Don't hang up.