These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
You are clearly ignorant of the meaning of the word charged. You just said it yourself, you are getting charged the fee for 500, the fee being 3.50.Rudy Pena wrote:No, You are getting charged the fee for 500. so when you look at your transactions. you will see you got charged 503.50.
Field Marshall wrote:lol, hilarious
You are receiving, yes. But on your account transaction, you are being charged 503.50. 500 is the money you took and the 3.50 is the fee.Clarkey wrote:You are clearly ignorant of the meaning of the word charged. You just said it yourself, you are getting charged the fee for 500, the fee being 3.50.Rudy Pena wrote:No, You are getting charged the fee for 500. so when you look at your transactions. you will see you got charged 503.50.
You are "receiving" 500 and being "charged" 3.50. You are not being "charged" 503.50.
Rudy Pena wrote:Field Marshall wrote:lol, hilarious
Yes it is. I love making clarkey make a fool of himself.
Do you? Wait, I know you do, cause you use money on the game.Kikaz wrote:Rudy Pena wrote:Field Marshall wrote:lol, hilarious
Yes it is. I love making clarkey make a fool of himself.
Your the only one making a fool of yourself...
If you bought something for 500.00 you might have a tax of 3.50.. with say a credit card or paypal
But your not...
Your at an ATM withdrawing $500.00 of your own dollars according to your scenario.
And getting taxed, or charged $3.50.
Seriously do you even have a bank account?
Again showing your ignorance to the meaning of being charged. When you are being charged something in relation to money it means the money is being taken away from you. The 3.50 being taken away from you, the 500 is not. The receipt of the deposit would show how much you withdrew and how much you were charged for withdrawing it, i.e. 3.50.Rudy Pena wrote:You are receiving, yes. But on your account transaction, you are being charged 503.50. 500 is the money you took and the 3.50 is the fee.Clarkey wrote:You are clearly ignorant of the meaning of the word charged. You just said it yourself, you are getting charged the fee for 500, the fee being 3.50.Rudy Pena wrote:No, You are getting charged the fee for 500. so when you look at your transactions. you will see you got charged 503.50.
You are "receiving" 500 and being "charged" 3.50. You are not being "charged" 503.50.
That makes it clearer. I was under the impression the first number was the amount you were trying to deposit before a fee was taken.BMMJ13 wrote:It used to be from tax, it would say how much you tried to deposit, and how much was actually deposited basically.
As it says, (2% of deposit taken as a transaction cost)
Deposit successful. You deposited 98,000,000,000 , which took 100,000,000,000 to do.
Basically you deposited 100 bil, but because of 2% transaction fee, only 98 bil was actually put into your bank.
Clarkey wrote:That makes it clearer. I was under the impression the first number was the amount you were trying to deposit before a fee was taken.BMMJ13 wrote:It used to be from tax, it would say how much you tried to deposit, and how much was actually deposited basically.
As it says, (2% of deposit taken as a transaction cost)
Deposit successful. You deposited 98,000,000,000 , which took 100,000,000,000 to do.
Basically you deposited 100 bil, but because of 2% transaction fee, only 98 bil was actually put into your bank.
Kikaz wrote:Actually..
It was 'You deposited X amount of NAQ at a cost of *Tax*'
So your still wrong.
Rudy Pena wrote:Listen, people who are asceneded. They dont pay the 2%. Only the unascended, so since you have ascended, you keep all the naq you bank. As opposed to when you were unascended.
So, Ascended means no 2%
Unascended means you pay 2%.
There is no bug here.
[/spoiler]Clarkey wrote:If you take a second and read what he actually said instead of trying to be smart then you'd see that it doesn't matter whether he is ascended or not.Rudy Pena wrote:Clarkey wrote:Thank you for reporting the bug, we'll see that Admin is made aware of it.
It would always be good, to see if the person is ascended or not.
As ascended people, do not have to have no fee.Maybe you should listen, in fact read.Rudy Pena wrote:Listen, people who are asceneded. They dont pay the 2%. Only the unascended, so since you have ascended, you keep all the naq you bank. As opposed to when you were unascended.
So, Ascended means no 2%
Unascended means you pay 2%.
There is no bug here.
We know ascended accounts pay 0% fee when depositing and unascended pay 2% fee when depositing.
Now, if the coding was correct behind the scenes this is what you would see in both circumstances:
Unascended - Deposit successful. You deposited 42,038,902,686, which took 840,778,053 to do.
Ascended - Deposit successful. You deposited 42,038,902,686, which took 0 to do.
But instead he gets this: Deposit successful. You deposited 42,038,902,686, which took 42,038,902,686 to do. Which is basically telling him it took 100% fee to deposit the funds instead of 0%. This doesn't affect the mechanics of the game because the correct funds are actually deposited and/or removed as a fee. But the text being displayed is inaccurate. Not a big bug but still a bug.
Anymore failed smart comments?