Page 2 of 2
yup
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:23 am
by [ZerO]
yes , i think usul's spin off of my idea is better than my own..... i just hope the game runners will see the validity of such an idea.
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:48 am
by I Replicate
If that 24hr thing for commanders is implemented, it would make me sad...
It would mean i would have to wait 24hrs to sab unwelcomed people who leeched off me...
But then again, if they leeched 24hrs of stuff off me, I would just sab and attack them even more... so i guess, either way, i get my revenge
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:29 pm
by Myseri
There is no way this rule should be changed.
There are those out there that would fine someone w/ a large army size that just went on PPT and leech off of them. This happened to me when I was on PPT. I had to dismiss them so I could get my spy level I was going for.
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:31 pm
by [ZerO]
as usul suggested,, the commander would have the ability, same as an alliance leader...to accept or reject an application for officer
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:14 pm
by Eternal Usul
Come now, certainly someone has an opinion!
Post or feel my goa'uldy wrath!
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:21 pm
by Setesh
If your commander doesnt want you to pass him, forget him and move on to someone better
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 7:08 pm
by Eternal Usul
Okay, what sense that made was lost on me.
Setesh is not my commander, I only follow the supreme hallowed elder one.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:48 am
by [ZerO]
this is the bottom line....though i hate when people have better ideas than me, Usul's idea does make sense. Giving the commanders the same power to pick and choose that is given to an alliance leader is the best (and I'd imagine, the easiest) way to get around this whole thing. Obviously, the last wave is over and I'm not bent about what happen anymore, but I see this as an oppurtunity for the game runners to institute this idea, to facilitate better game play ~ sekhmet
~there is good and there is evil....then there is me