NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
-
Myseri
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:30 am
- Alliance: The Pond
- Race: Goa'uld
- ID: 15959
- Location: Left Phonepole in the middle of no where
- Contact:
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Minor question, my ascended is not attached to my main, nor do I want it attached. But what would happen if I hit the "permanently de-ascend" action?


-
Mato
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:34 am
- ID: 0
- Location: rome
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Myseri wrote:Minor question, my ascended is not attached to my main, nor do I want it attached. But what would happen if I hit the "permanently de-ascend" action?
err.. you just have admited that you have more than 1 account
-
Tanith
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:08 pm
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 86581
- Location: USA
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Mato wrote:Myseri wrote:Minor question, my ascended is not attached to my main, nor do I want it attached. But what would happen if I hit the "permanently de-ascend" action?
err.. you just have admited that you have more than 1 account
Nice job
Mod Color


-
Shornaal
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:36 am
- Alliance: Delta Allegiance
- Race: System God
- ID: 52597
- Location: Your nightmare
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Mato wrote:Myseri wrote:Minor question, my ascended is not attached to my main, nor do I want it attached. But what would happen if I hit the "permanently de-ascend" action?
err.. you just have admited that you have more than 1 account
Interesting......
-
Rich™
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:58 am
- Alliance: Alpha Allegiance
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 1908612
- Location: Portsmouth, UK
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
lmao, nice one
- chargin
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:45 pm
- ID: 0
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
so what is currently limiting growth at high levels? the first post needs to be updated again lol.
WeaponX you won't be getting that 1 million APP for free in the real server, it'd cost trillions of naq in main.
I thought the max stuff was in relation to your max LF (can't find where it was written now lol).
The so called 1 trick ponies won't have the free 1mill APP and the bigger players in ascension could be increasing their defenses now on the real server.
WeaponX you won't be getting that 1 million APP for free in the real server, it'd cost trillions of naq in main.
I thought the max stuff was in relation to your max LF (can't find where it was written now lol).
The so called 1 trick ponies won't have the free 1mill APP and the bigger players in ascension could be increasing their defenses now on the real server.

I say smart things so people don't realize how dumb i am.
-
S T I
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:33 pm
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
This is my exchange rate atm
times 180,000,000 Dark Matter Units into 1,000
you can work out that i am nearing the 2 bill planet cap that was said a bout (unless that has changed)
so if this carrys on you can all see that I am others are getting our ####s handed to us on a plate.
so maybe you can see why some people are getting upset
at least change the exchage rate back to what it was & readdress the planet cap to make it fair to all, it will benifit the ones coming, so every one gains, but it means that there will be no one losing out.
time is running out for some of us.
jeff (S T I)
times 180,000,000 Dark Matter Units into 1,000
you can work out that i am nearing the 2 bill planet cap that was said a bout (unless that has changed)
so if this carrys on you can all see that I am others are getting our ####s handed to us on a plate.
so maybe you can see why some people are getting upset
at least change the exchage rate back to what it was & readdress the planet cap to make it fair to all, it will benifit the ones coming, so every one gains, but it means that there will be no one losing out.
time is running out for some of us.
jeff (S T I)
Red XIII wrote:Just blame Omega instead. Much easier than writing an entire paragraph about a problem.
-
S T I
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:33 pm
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
S T I wrote:This is my exchange rate atm
times 180,000,000 Dark Matter Units into 1,000
you can work out that i am nearing the 2 bill planet cap that was said a bout (unless that has changed)
so if this carrys on you can all see that I am others are getting our ####s handed to us on a plate.
so maybe you can see why some people are getting upset![]()
at least change the exchage rate back to what it was & readdress the planet cap to make it fair to all, it will benifit the ones coming, so every one gains, but it means that there will be no one losing out.
time is running out for some of us.
jeff (S T I)
i took things in to my own hands
Red XIII wrote:Just blame Omega instead. Much easier than writing an entire paragraph about a problem.
-
Mojo Rising
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:10 pm
- ID: 1975707
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Jason,
Here's a suggestion: why don't you just merge the two servers? Since you are trying to make ascension into main, why not just go all the way and say, hey, no more ascension. MS's merge with Command Stars, planets would go into planets/UU/etc., levels would be converted into LF and then into APP and then into Naquadah. Fleets would be converted into UP, raiding would be eliminated from the game, and it would be a skill server once again. For those that never ascended, well, give them ascended weaponry for free (ie. upgrade their current weapons to ascended weaponry) or reduce everyone else's weaponry to the normal non-ascended stuff. No more ascended blessing but you keep your bonuses (for having played) and you get an extra bonus if you played well (say an extra 5% for the top 100).
Here's a suggestion: why don't you just merge the two servers? Since you are trying to make ascension into main, why not just go all the way and say, hey, no more ascension. MS's merge with Command Stars, planets would go into planets/UU/etc., levels would be converted into LF and then into APP and then into Naquadah. Fleets would be converted into UP, raiding would be eliminated from the game, and it would be a skill server once again. For those that never ascended, well, give them ascended weaponry for free (ie. upgrade their current weapons to ascended weaponry) or reduce everyone else's weaponry to the normal non-ascended stuff. No more ascended blessing but you keep your bonuses (for having played) and you get an extra bonus if you played well (say an extra 5% for the top 100).
-
Rich™
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:58 am
- Alliance: Alpha Allegiance
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 1908612
- Location: Portsmouth, UK
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Mojo Rising wrote:Jason,
Here's a suggestion: why don't you just merge the two servers? Since you are trying to make ascension into main, why not just go all the way and say, hey, no more ascension. MS's merge with Command Stars, planets would go into planets/UU/etc., levels would be converted into LF and then into APP and then into Naquadah. Fleets would be converted into UP, raiding would be eliminated from the game, and it would be a skill server once again. For those that never ascended, well, give them ascended weaponry for free (ie. upgrade their current weapons to ascended weaponry) or reduce everyone else's weaponry to the normal non-ascended stuff. No more ascended blessing but you keep your bonuses (for having played) and you get an extra bonus if you played well (say an extra 5% for the top 100).
is that top 100 of main or asc?
-
Tanith
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:08 pm
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 86581
- Location: USA
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Mojo Rising wrote:Jason,
Here's a suggestion: why don't you just merge the two servers? Since you are trying to make ascension into main, why not just go all the way and say, hey, no more ascension. MS's merge with Command Stars, planets would go into planets/UU/etc., levels would be converted into LF and then into APP and then into Naquadah. Fleets would be converted into UP, raiding would be eliminated from the game, and it would be a skill server once again. For those that never ascended, well, give them ascended weaponry for free (ie. upgrade their current weapons to ascended weaponry) or reduce everyone else's weaponry to the normal non-ascended stuff. No more ascended blessing but you keep your bonuses (for having played) and you get an extra bonus if you played well (say an extra 5% for the top 100).
Realisticly I don't think that will ever happen Mojo.
Mod Color


-
Mojo Rising
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:10 pm
- ID: 1975707
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
top 100 in ascension
-
Mato
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:34 am
- ID: 0
- Location: rome
-
Myseri
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:30 am
- Alliance: The Pond
- Race: Goa'uld
- ID: 15959
- Location: Left Phonepole in the middle of no where
- Contact:
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Mato wrote:Myseri wrote:Minor question, my ascended is not attached to my main, nor do I want it attached. But what would happen if I hit the "permanently de-ascend" action?
err.. you just have admited that you have more than 1 account
explain how I have more then one account?
I have one ascended account, and I have one main account. That is, in no way, breaking the game's rules. If it is then we are all screwed.


-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: NEW changes to Ascension (already in beta)
Mojo, it's forum's game...he can do whatever the heck he wants, if you/we don't like it, is anyone forcing us to keep playing it? I think not...
~N
~N






