Page 19 of 63
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:05 am
by Clockwork
Most of the action died down with the blood war update.
Nobody wants to be the first to get to 100% war stance, so massings are cut short when it gets to around 70% to give some room for farming.
That and everybody is busy with RL things, still , no rush, this is the war to end all wars after all
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:19 am
by Lithium
i herd it was the best massers in cooperation wit admin who implemented it....lol so stupid has gone this game...
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:36 pm
by NRVNQSR
Huh... that sucks. Still, hope you can enjoy yourselves a bit
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:28 pm
by xDaku
Lithium wrote:i herd it was the best massers in cooperation wit admin who implemented it....lol so stupid has gone this game...
They're too scared to mass it out. Has nothing to do with admin lol. Hating on something without trying it is a fail.
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:29 am
by Fallen Gabriel
xDaku wrote:Lithium wrote:i herd it was the best massers in cooperation wit admin who implemented it....lol so stupid has gone this game...
They're too scared to mass it out. Has nothing to do with admin lol. Hating on something without trying it is a fail.
You know xDaku,for once I agree with you. Fancy that...
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 4:52 am
by mcdeadly
Lithium wrote:i see , looks ppl are missing each-other withing one alliance figure out playing wars but at least some replied , its a good sign
not the case at all.
just jokes. some people have not posted for a while thats all!
Fallen Gabriel wrote:xDaku wrote:Lithium wrote:i herd it was the best massers in cooperation wit admin who implemented it....lol so stupid has gone this game...
They're too scared to mass it out. Has nothing to do with admin lol. Hating on something without trying it is a fail.
You know xDaku,for once I agree with you. Fancy that...
all the "big massers" are in amall 4-5 man alliances so blood war dont happen. welcome back delta and a bunch of new dde alliances.
makes for the fun to be kept on having without all the extra rules
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:55 am
by Lithium
each time players have interacted wit admin has resulted sinking he game deeper. i wonder why....maybe cuz some players want to take an adv from teh game system and same for amdin but resulting with both sides not having what they were looking for. so far loss of time and effort and another miserable update that ruins yr fun.
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:21 am
by R0B3RT
I.m Bored The big cat on vacantion gandy inactive mcdeadly hit and run on ppt sadams The same
Is not The update is DDE The Problem Here
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:25 pm
by The Outlaw
Actually DDE formed a group of 5 member alliances to participate in the Blood Wars using a strike unit concept. It can potentially pit accounts going to war that are at or near equal based on the teams formed. OE on the other hand has formed a group of sub 5 member alliances to avoid the Blood War. So when "they" decide to get it together we will have some Blood War action. I am not going to say etl's group are hiding from being potentially outscored, but I will say they are avoiding Blood War on purpose. And the Blood War mode did not kill this war.
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:29 pm
by Kjarkur
And OE have admitted in this thread that it's what they are doing.
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 pm
by R0B3RT
DDE want a blood war who want join from omega ?
come on we can have some fun
not just bla bla on forum
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:21 pm
by EbilCC
LewTenAnt is suspended i CC
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:10 pm
by Clockwork
I would be up for giving the blood war a go, but my account is smaller compared to most of the active DDE guys (in terms of covert + MS).
I'll see who else fancies it.
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:21 pm
by ~phalax~
The Outlaw wrote:Actually DDE formed a group of 5 member alliances to participate in the Blood Wars using a strike unit concept. It can potentially pit accounts going to war that are at or near equal based on the teams formed. OE on the other hand has formed a group of sub 5 member alliances to avoid the Blood War. So when "they" decide to get it together we will have some Blood War action. I am not going to say etl's group are hiding from being potentially outscored, but I will say they are avoiding Blood War on purpose. And the Blood War mode did not kill this war.
So how many OE alliances does your strike unit have a 100% war meter on?
Re: The War To End All Wars DDE VS OE Part II
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:13 pm
by The Outlaw
Wukong wrote:The Outlaw wrote:Actually DDE formed a group of 5 member alliances to participate in the Blood Wars using a strike unit concept. It can potentially pit accounts going to war that are at or near equal based on the teams formed. OE on the other hand has formed a group of sub 5 member alliances to avoid the Blood War. So when "they" decide to get it together we will have some Blood War action. I am not going to say etl's group are hiding from being potentially outscored, but I will say they are avoiding Blood War on purpose. And the Blood War mode did not kill this war.
So how many OE alliances does your strike unit have a 100% war meter on?
I think that question is irrelavent due to the fact the branches from omega and titans have less than 5, not to mention the meter wont get to near 20% massing those.
need some flavoring now?