Finarfin wrote:SVaRuN wrote:A suggestion for DAEMONDS for you Admin
Daemons are ppl who used to be ascended and therfor have obtained some of the knowledge that they used to posses while being ascended and with them deascending themselves they actually can use some of that knowledge in main.
So once it happens DAEMON could get an option to chose from (which of the knowledge will he obtain options being )
( mind only numbers I have considered reasonable are put here if Admin sees some better ones he can easily changes them)
~ 15% Attack boost
~ 15% Defence Boost
~ 10% MS Bonus (fleets inculded)
~ 20% Covert/AC Bonus
~ 5% Income Bonus
~ 5% UP Bonus
Now this is what Daemon could obtain but he could choose only one of the above options and the option would disply under Technology as an additional TECH. (Call it ascension TECH or whatever)
Now as we wanted to have a two-edged sword and since it would be unfair to just reward ppl who stop playing ascension with Bonuses the following would be possible.
Since Daemon has deascended himself and is a way like banished from Ascesion plane he could suffer an effect called (lets just call it this way so we have a term to use in this example LoL) Ascended PLAGUE.
Every time DAEMOND would attack he would RISK ASCENEDED plagues and it the chance of it happening would be EXACTLY the same as the chance of getting ascended blessing (it would in a way replace it). When this PLAGUE would "strike" the DAEMOND would lose 2% of worth of his original attack in units. To explain if Daimond would have:
1,2 mils of Super soldiers
2,2 mils of attack mercs
= 3,4 mils of total in units
being a total of about 440 bils attack (just incase you wonder)
When PLAGUE would strike he would lose 2% of his units in attack = 68k of units but he wouldnt lose them in attack. Nope that could easily be abused (he just gets the 15% attack bonus and would gain more then with losing some random attack units)... he would lose his miners...
So in some massing this guy would lose like 500k UUs + just because of this blessing (and the % can even be set higher)
In this way the guy couldnt warfare with some alliances and doing guerilla like tactics well he could but he would be loosing whats dear to him and thats miners...
If this daimond would be a peacefull player he wouldnt lose units with raiding and stuff like that...since his attack when he raids is surely small
But thats not all there is one more thing!
Every time the market would reset (so once weekly) this guy would lose (now here are two possibilities you Admin pick)
His daily UP (whatever the figure) or a fixed amount of units (suggestion 500k)
This way daimonds would have a rough time warfaring with ppl knowing they cant be touched in ascension. Especially as we all know ppls defences will jsut be getting bigger and to mass tehm ppl like daemond will just need 1 trill+ attack and losses he will have then will just be huge!
Also Any peaceloving Daemond who thinks he ll just have his up bonus or income one and use it to get pass the limit of 75 and others will have in future think again you ll lose quite some units weekly (if you ll farm for naq even some more) so Daemond will have even a harder time to egt pass the limits.
Never the less it will all be possible also bonuses will be interesting and new thing so quite some ppl may decide to be daemond but they certanly wont have it EASY...
Thats my suggestion at least ADMIN (Jason) it can be altered so it fits even more but the main idea is to keep the two edged sword, to keep daemond as an interesting part of gameplay and to add a bit of SG in it and make it fitting with the things we know.
Best Regards: Blue
Sorry, I think that idea is terrible. Your suggestion doesn't mean that they wouldn't have it easy - It would cripple them for no good reason, and ANYBODY could stomp them into the ground. Losing UP or 500k UU a week is beyond unfair. They would need 71k UP just to break even on the UU scale, and losing your UP each week would just stop them getting any at all.
Losing 2% of your attack size is just as ridiculous, especially if it is just on top of what is already lost. No reasonable person would choose to be a Daimon under your system. They simply would lose too much for no gain.
I also agree that this would be an extremely bad move for the Daimon race. It would not only permanently cripple anyone that should decide to play that race but it would also make that race/aspect of the game completely unplayable. The idea that PSICOLIX posted I think has some merit since it would still cost those who decided to decend themselves but it wouldn't cripple them indefinately.





