Page 5 of 18

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:06 am
by keemik
[KMA]Avenger wrote:the pictures i have posted are meant to remind us that no matter who is right or wrong and who did what to who, its always the civilians that suffer the most.
a civilian is a civilian no mater what side they are on.
my bad i should have made it clear from the outset.


I get your point and yes you should have.

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:30 pm
by Thriller
Brdavs wrote:
Thriller wrote:
urogard wrote:
Thriller wrote:I disagree.. with a few points. 1) Washington is probably not backing Georgia because they have their own problems right now. The COLD WAR IS OVER!!!

Maybe the cold war is over, but the neo-colonialist+neo-imperialist foreign policy of the USA remains.
And by saying that you have most likely no clue about political strategies and common sense. A tiny country will never go provoking a superpower without knowing it has the backing of another strong country.

Thriller wrote:Russia has a declining population, declining standard of living(this is starting to Flatten out) and has a potential aids epidemic on their hands. The war being started by Russian influence makes more sense because they have a growing descent growing amongst their people over the declining living standards and increased mortality rate.

You seriously need to get some fresh air and need to read up on some real information instead of the right wing several decades old propaganda.

nvm, i forgot that russians also smell of vinegar, wash their beards with vodka, even woman have beards and they fluoridate your water to make you more succeptible to brainwashing.


Thriller wrote:Can you think of a better way of instilling national pride then defeating an aggressor army and liberating a region from invaders(WWII....?). If you knew the history of the region though you would know that this conflict has been brewing for quite sometime so its no surprise it went off. Russia will probably win this war and get back some of its pride, which just maybe the kick start they need to get their country out of what i consider the tail end of the Russian Great depression.

I know the history of a lot of regions quite well, most likely even better than you. Why? I have my reasons.

And again you have no understanding of russian mentality because of it I'll explain you a simple concept even I hold on to.
There are 2 types of people, one who constantly needs to proove to others their strength in order to keep up their pride and show how tough they are, i.e. Georgia. And there are the kind of people who know how strong they are, they know they don't have to care and they really don't care about what others think of them. They also don't need to proove anything to themselves but they will hold their ground when some idiot from group 1 goes and annoys them year after year and finally crosses the border by attacking their troops without any good reason.



haha everything i stated about Russia is fact dimwit. Read a book

here are some sources plz provide your own to support your own ridiculous claims.

Declining population and unemployment trends
http://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedin ... chap2.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... i_20339797

Aids epidemic
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1043675.stm
http://www.aidsonline.com/pt/re/aids/ab ... 28!8091!-1


You have got to be kidding me. Seriously.

First off an aging populous is a hallmark of a post war baby boom generation getting old. And it is no indication of economical success. Scratch that, the older the populous and the fewer the children it produces the more "well off" society seems to be. Case in point is Europe, the aging demographics of the past 2 decades did not seem to hurt us *that* much lol. You want a 30year average with 5 kids per woman? I suggest you look to the Saharan desert. Fact of life.

As far as stuff like unemployment goes... you could start by updating your sources by I dunno 10 years :lol: You`re operating with charts that ed at 1997 for Christ sake lol! That's the basic of your "conclusions"? Logic escapes you BIG time. By your standards USD is still the strongest currency around. :P For fracks sake at least try I doono looking it up on Wikipedia if you cant do better. And look at the pictures displaying GDP, Debt, trade surplus, n of graduates investments etc.

And Aids is without a cure still you know heh? You got "epidemic" fears all over the world. Speaking of it I wonder when the non discriminating US will let aids infected ppl enter the country heh...


But since you prolly wont be bothered by checking all the sources in that wikipedia article I`ll just pitch you one you should be worshiping:

Dated May 30, 2008
http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/106151.pdf

and if you`re too lazy for that still:

[spoiler]
Summary
The Russian economy has grown impressively since 1999 and, by some
measures, has been one of the fastest growing economies in the world. The growth
has brought an improvement in the standard of living of the average Russian citizen
and has brought economic stability that Russia had not experienced in at least a
decade. This strong performance is a major factor in the popular support that former
President (now Prime Minister) Putin enjoys– some 70%-80% of the population view
him favorably. The improvement in the Russian economy is also arguably a factor
in the boldness with which the Putin leadership has reasserted Russia’s status as a
world power, challenging the United States, Europe, the other former Soviet states
in economic and national security areas.
The Russian economy is highly dependent on the production and export of oil,
gas, and other natural resources. Its success has largely been the result of recordbreaking
world energy prices, although prudent fiscal policies have also helped to
promote economic stability. However, oil dependence could prove to be a doubleedged
sword. The Putin regime’s failure to complete important economic reforms
and its penchant for re-asserting government control over key economic sectors also
loom among the possible roadblocks down the road. How Putin’s successor,
President Dmitriy Medvedev, will proceed is still a matter of speculation.

Although its influence has been greatly diminished since the Soviet period,
Russia remains a formidable force on the global stage, and its influence seems to be
growing. Russia’s economy is large enough to influence global economic conditions.
Many European countries and former Soviet states are highly dependent on Russian
natural gas. Russia is a significant player on a number of issues critical to the United
States, for example, nuclear proliferation by Iran and North Korea. Russia’s
perceived national interests do not always match those of the United States, creating
an environment for disagreement if not conflict.
While U.S. exports to Russia are still relatively small, for some producers, such
as poultry, energy equipment, and technology, Russia is an important market. Russia
is also an important supplier of a number of raw materials that are critical to U.S.
manufacturers. These links have drawn the attention of some Members of Congress.
Hearings have recently been held on Russian economic performance and policies.
Congress may consider in the near future whether to extend permanent normal trade
relations (PNTR) status to Russia as Russia pursues accession to the World Trade
Organization (WTO). This report on Russian economic conditions and policies will
be updated as events warrant.



Part directly responding to your claims about living standard & unemployment:
As Figure 1 and Table 2 show, Russia has experienced strong economic growth
over the last nine years (1999-2007), during which time its GDP has increased 6.9%
on average per year in contrast to an average annual decline in GDP of 6.8% during
the previous seven years (1992-1998). The positive GDP trends are reflected in other
measurements that point to an improved Russian standard of living throughout the
period. Average real wages in Russia increased 10.5% per year from 1999-2007.
(Real wages actually increased 14.7% from 2000-2007, having declined by 23.2%
in 1999 because of spike in inflation that year.) In addition, real disposable income
(the income that the average Russian resident has available from all sources after
taxes) increased 10.7% from 2000 to 2007 (8.5% from 1999 to 2007). The Russian
unemployment rate has also declined during the 1999-2007 period, from 12.6% to
6.2%.


All I can add is lulz, get up to date.[/spoiler]

Now if you`re gonna cry in a corner over this burst bubble of yours, I can give you a hankie.


"However, oil dependence could prove to be a double edged
sword. The Putin regime’s failure to complete important economic reforms
and its penchant for re-asserting government control over key economic sectors also
loom among the possible roadblocks down the road."

"Although its influence has been greatly diminished since the Soviet period"

"...most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports.

As i said earlier, they are coming off a what I considered the Russian great depression. All this article says is that they are emerging back into a substantial economy again. EMERGING being the key word in my sentence. The 1997 stuff shows their economic collapse after the iron curtain fell. I was using to demonstrate the hit Russians took after their political transition devastated their economy. Yes they are getting better, but it can be compared to painting an old house. IT looks nicer but you still know the roof needs work, their is still the crack in the foundation and the yard is a mess. ie. They are still diminished from the global power they were.

Maybe you should assume that I know how to rationaly think as well. Instead of jumping to conclusions about the thought I expressed and deriving false conclusions.

Save your hankie for your intellectual **Filtered**. "oh, great scholar"

PS. give me your links about how a diminishing populous is good for Russia.

"First off an aging populus is a hallamrk of a post war baby boom generation getting old"
Since what is happening their is more than just a baby boom effect this does not apply.

"the older the populous and the fewer the children it produces the more "well off" society seems to be."
source plz

"And Aids is without a cure still you know heh? You got "epidemic" fears all over the world. Speaking of it I wonder when the non discriminating US will let aids infected ppl enter the country heh..."

When has a country ever admitted immigrants suffering from a contagious deadly disease without special circumstances?

Most experts estimate that the number of HIV infected is somewhere between 1.5 million and 2 million citizens, or over 2 percent of the adult population. And when scientists and experts say that by 2010 10% of you male populous(this is how it is spelled) will have HIV, you have an epidemic.

Wikipedia sources don't count. give me their sources. (if no university will accept Wiki as a source, no one should)

OH here is a better "non partial" summary of the russian economy http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Economi ... Symbol=RUB
and i fixed your spelling mistakes :)

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:06 pm
by urogard
off topic guys, this is about the georgian invesion into south ossetia and abkhazia and the resultant russian military response in upholding the treaties georgia decided to break, not about the supposed condition of russian demographic/economy/whatnot.

Btw guys, there's like 4 mil people living in georgia. There's one mil georgians living in russia alone.

And further on about some history lessons. Initially countries like georgia and the like all wanted to enter the russian empire (19th century) in order to avoid getting ravaged by the turks and their invasions, so whilst russian soldiers were fighting and dying in defending ALL lands under russian rule the georgians lived happily ever after.
Then sometime later a famous georgian, last name Djugashvili, who never really bothered to learn proper russian and changed his name later to Stalin became the leader of the Soviet union and put added south Ossetia to the Georgian Socialist Republic.
And here we are today.

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:57 pm
by Juliette
*spanks everyone except Urogard*
;) Well said, Uro. Go on.

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:19 pm
by Demeisen
urogard was off topic along with everyone else methinks.

Russian forces enter Georgia from the breakaway region of Abkhazia as the conflict between the neighbours appears to broaden


WTH! why!!!!!! this is retarded

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:32 pm
by Juliette
LiQuiD wrote:urogard was off topic along with everyone else methinks.

Russian forces enter Georgia from the breakaway region of Abkhazia as the conflict between the neighbours appears to broaden


WTH! why!!!!!! this is retarded


Okay.. so theoretically, I shoot your sister and say "We are not fighting!".
You shoot my arm, and say "Oh damn yes, we ARE fighting, you filty sister-killer."
I cry out for help to the international community because you are shooting at me. :(


I am Georgia.
I cannot defend me.
You are Russia.
You are right.


Now argue to me why I am not right, and you are. :)

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:59 pm
by Demeisen
i think you may have gone a bit too far into the world of random for me. am i russia? :-D

Lois Lane wrote:WTH! why!!!!!! this is retarded


you dont think fighting there is retarded? people are dying pointlessly. you dont want peace there? i do

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:19 pm
by S0lid Snake
I haven't had time to read this entire thread, so I'll say my piece.

Georgia started this off with American and Israeli backing.

With China & Russia busy, the USA, UK, France are sending a massive Fleet of 50+ vessels to blockage Iran (This would be an act of war), once Russia deals with Georgia & China finishes up with the Olympics they will back Iran.

I've hear that Russia might now be trying to open up a land route into Iran.

These are some scary developments people.

If you doubt this do some searching on the Fleet heading to the Persian gulf, unfortunately for us in the UK, USA & Europe the media has turned a blind eye to these facts.

Peace. V :?

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:24 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
NATO instructor taken hostage with Georgians amid reports of U.S. military commanding thousands of mercs in proxy war

An American mercenary has been captured by Russian forces along with a number of Georgian soldiers according to a report from the Russian news website Izvestia, providing more evidence that the U.S. and NATO are covertly supporting the Georgian army in a proxy war with Russia.

According to the report, the mercenary is an African-American who is a NATO instructor and an ordinance specialist. He has now been transferred to the Russian base of Vladikavkaz.

The story also backs up previous reports of dead black Americans having been found in Tskhinvali, the capital city of South Ossetia.

U.S. soldiers recently conducted training programs where they instructed Georgian soldiers how to deal with unexploded ordinance as part of the Georgia Train and Equip Program.

Another report from the Russia daily Kommersant states that thousands of mercenaries from numerous different countries are fighting on the Georgian side and are being “commanded by the U.S. military instructors.”

“The U.S. military instructors directly command and coordinate actions of mercenaries without being involved in actual fighting, the source specified. According to intelligence data, there are roughly 1,000 military instructors of the United States in Georgia,” states the report.

“Task force of Russia has annihilated a few groups of mercenaries. Some of mercenaries have been captured, and investigators are working with them, the source said.”

In a related development, Russia FSB has detained 10 Georgian intelligence service officers who were allegedly preparing terrorist attacks inside Russia.

“We have detained 10 agents of the Georgian special services who were spying on military facilities and preparing terrorist attacks, including on Russian territory,” Alexander Bortnikov said at a meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

Russia has today launched new forays into Georgia itself even after Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili signed a cease-fire pledge. Russia claims that Georgia has not honored the cease-fire and continues to attack Russian positions.

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:32 pm
by urogard
LiQuiD wrote:urogard was off topic along with everyone else methinks.

Russian forces enter Georgia from the breakaway region of Abkhazia as the conflict between the neighbours appears to broaden


WTH! why!!!!!! this is retarded

ehm because gerogians attacked the region of abkhazia just like they did with south ossetia.

Now initially the russians basically offered the georgians to GTHO immediately and return to status quo without any incidents.

The georgians ignored the offer, and now after they kept on attacking they finally get it that no one will help them and they are getting wasted so they like to try and say they accept russia's previous offer which is of course by this time completely void.

And because of all this the russians are entering georgia.
Personally I'd say they should invade all of georgia, unseat Saakashvili, put him to trial by the international court and put georgia under mandate of the un for the next 5 years with the clause that no nation may build under any circumstances a military base in there.

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:40 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
russia says "If U.S. Attacks Russia, Russia will be Forced to Use Nuclear Weapons Against United States."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JWslrz77zY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=380DYsymHkA


also US troops are already on iranian soil :shock: :?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7JKJTPM ... re=related

anyone know who this retired colonel Sam Gardiner- US Airforce is, is he trust worthy on what he says??


PS. agrees with uro^

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:48 am
by Juliette
Gardiner is a real monkey. Faker.

http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/2005/ ... r-but.html
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sam_Gardiner
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/1 ... right-now/

(No.. I did not google for "Gardiner liar", but "sam gardiner".)



So no.. I really wouldn't attribute an ounce of truth to this so-called 'expert'. :)
Of course, you're free to be of a different mind.

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:05 am
by Brdavs
Lol Thriller you`re beyond help.

Your central thesis was that Russia is doing this on a back of a depression to deter the attention from internal problems with standard and government popularity. When it has been shown that Russia and its average citizen have been on a gradual to steep rise for close to a decade and that Putind and Medvedev enjoy 80% support (bot things US & Bush can only dream about at this point) you change tune by pointing out its no loner as influentual as the Soviet union (lol, as if the US is still as influential today as it was then), that they`re dependant on oil exports (well duh, we`re dependant on oil imports, its called "world economy". We`re just as screwed by not buying russian oil as they would be by not selling it lol) etc.

But hey think what you will lol. Fact of the matter is evident (for those that are willing to take the starspangled blinders off): China and Russia are in the big leagues to stay again and that it`s not a matter of "if" but of "when" till they both need to be treated as fullfedged equals on the floors of geostrategical politics, which has been a domain of the West for the past few decades. The sooner we come to grips whith that the better off we will be. They largly have us by the marbles allready and they know it. This georgia affair is but a case in point.







On topic:
Looks like the Russians blew up every piece of georgian military hardware bigger than a jeep and have called a hault to their military operations after establishing a buffer zone...

Looks like a sound victory for the Russians here... Relativly poor georgia that dumped insane amounts of GDP into mainly western weapons lost the majority of the investment, they secured the brakeaway regions for the forseeable future and forced the international community to finally resolve the issue. Not to mention sticking it to NATO, shaterring any hopes Georgia had of entering NATO in the forseeable future and showing any pro american regiemes croping up in their neighborhood that they`ll get stood up by the west (as per usual) when push comes to shove, since there is no way in hell washington/brusels will want to tango with moscow for places like tblisi when they need the Russians happy and on "their side" more for things like Iran heh... Even if it has the only russian independant oil pipeline to Europe. And the Russians have signaled a change in their external policy that wont include bending over any more, so the west is more likely to handle them whith gloves from now on.


One more for urogard heh:

Image

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:18 am
by [KMA]Avenger
lmao that cartoon pretty much sums it all up :lol:

anyways, i'm pretty sure that this mess is not done with and can see russia moving quickly to support iran to make sure america thinks twice about attacking them (on the other hand this maybe exactly what the neocons want because it would make damn sure a conflict takes place) but i've just found this film about Cheneys plans to setup a false flag op against iran and give then the reason they need to start yet another conflict:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r29BtzfSz0o

JUST WHO THE HELL IS IN CHARGE IN THE WHITEHOUSE?

i know who is in charge and its not Bush or anyone else in the whitehouse so what the hell is Cheney playing at!?!?

these neoconfascist pigs are playing with the world like a cat plays with a ball of string and couldnt give a crap if they trigger an all out nuclear war :?



i've said it before and i'll say it again, both the UK and the US governments need to be brought to task for mass murder, genocide, treason and high crimes against all of us.

these people are very ill and we need to be humanitarian enough to put them out of their misery!

Re: 2008 South Ossetia War

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:21 am
by keemik
urogard wrote:
LiQuiD wrote:urogard was off topic along with everyone else methinks.

Russian forces enter Georgia from the breakaway region of Abkhazia as the conflict between the neighbours appears to broaden


WTH! why!!!!!! this is retarded

ehm because gerogians attacked the region of abkhazia just like they did with south ossetia.

Now initially the russians basically offered the georgians to GTHO immediately and return to status quo without any incidents.

The georgians ignored the offer, and now after they kept on attacking they finally get it that no one will help them and they are getting wasted so they like to try and say they accept russia's previous offer which is of course by this time completely void.

And because of all this the russians are entering georgia.
Personally I'd say they should invade all of georgia, unseat Saakashvili, put him to trial by the international court and put georgia under mandate of the un for the next 5 years with the clause that no nation may build under any circumstances a military base in there.


I quote myself to respond
keemik wrote:And whats that crap about Georgia attacking another separated region... When you have trouble to hold one front why you open another? On the other hand if you could not brake one front fast enough then you open another. So who is attacking who in another separate region? ;) You guys really need some downtime with the news(and i do not think Russian ones). Russia sent hes army in that region yesterday and bombed villages there.


And a also urge people... Don't believe Russian news reports blindly. All know that many believe like western mass media is manipulative And you are right! Every media is more or less manipulative. But Russian mainstream are connected directly to the Russian government. And smaller and independent newspapers are on the verge of extinction and constantly loosing their journalists.